Bubble Watch NCAAB 2026 – II

What a week across college hoops, and welcome back to what will hopefully become your bubble respite over the next few weeks as we count down to Selection Sunday. The story of the season continued as the top teams in the country, for the most part, continued to dominate their way through conference play. There were a few notable bubble upsets though, with Indiana taking the cake as the story of the week as they racked up 2 big time Q1 wins over Purdue and UCLA to surge to the Last 4 in / First 4 Out discussion. Ultimately though, those stories of picking up big time wins seem few and far between this year, as teams like Virginia Tech, TCU, Wake Forest and many others continue to miss out on chances to knock off the big boys. What that is leading us to is widening our net to try and find more bubble teams in these smaller conferences, with a 3-bid WCC on the table and a 4th and 5th MWC team getting added to the Watch this week. While we are getting some fantastic showdowns with titans in the Big 12 and Big 10, the bubble increasingly looks like it’s going to be filled with mid-major teams piling up wins and holding on to a couple of top-50 wins. That may be enough this year given how teams like Ohio St, Miami, Oklahoma St and more continue to whiff on their chances in conference play. Maybe it will shift, but so far, the top is strong, and that ripple effect is making itself obvious as we break down these bubble resumés. No matter how it looks, we’ll still be here breaking it all down, so with that let’s get to it.

For those new here stick with me, as I explain more about what I’m doing, vets can skip ahead with the buttons below.

So, I’m going to assign teams to 4 groups – Locks, On the Right Track, Teetering and Outside Looking In. Any team left out is not even on the radar. To avoid any confusion, let’s quickly define what I’m looking at for each.

“Locks” – Basically, these are teams I don’t see a world they don’t get in. I must admit I’m a below average gambler, see last year, so I am going to be quite stingy when it comes to assigning locks, ya better have the resumé to lose almost every game left and still get in.

“On the Right Track” – This group will range from teams who are on the precipice of getting locked down to teams who lie in the 6-7 seed range, as they’re comfortably in the field but a string of losses could send them spiraling toward the true bubble danger zone.

“Teetering” – This is the group of teams that are truly on the bubble, where every win and loss can shift where they stand and how comfortable they feel. They could range from the 8-9 seeds who look solid but are by no means safe, to the teams you find on the first 4 or next 4 out lists. 

“Outside Looking In” – These are the desperate teams, who are not close to in according to Bracket Matrix, but have enough opportunities to have a path to work themselves in.

I have provided below the Quadrant system to help contextualize what I’m referring to when discussing wins. Each conference has a table with the team’s resumé to reference at the beginning, for your own comparison, including the locks. Also worth mentioning, any of these teams can get their way in by winning the Conference tourney, I’m assuming with all of these blurbs they will need an at-large bid. For a breakdown of the available bubble spots see below, as we have 62 teams on the Watch, but many of those will be missing out. So without further ado, let’s get it. All info as of 2/2. Check out my current bracket projection here

Quadrant 1 (Q1)Quadrant 2 (Q2)Quadrant 3 (Q3)Quadrant 4 (Q4)
Home (1-30)Home (31-75)Home (76-160)Home (161-364)
Neutral (1-50)Neutral (51-100)Neutral (101-200)Neutral (201-364)
Away (1-75)Away (76-135)Away (136-240)Away (241-364)

Bubble Breakdown:

Total Bids: 68

1-bid conferences: 23

Locks: 10

Bids Left: 35

Bubble: 52


–ACC–

Locks: 

duke
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

UNC (23 NET)

unc

The Tar Heels played just once since we last met and they went on the road and stayed hot, taking care of GA Tech with ease. The story this entire season has been guard play, as we know they have one of the best front courts in the country with Veesar and Wilson. Trimble is steady now that he’s back from injury, but it’s been the play of Bogavac of late who has been a huge spark with 7 threes during this 3 game winning streak. Having a shooter to stretch the floor will be critical going forward, as the other 3 guards who have played have struggled to do so at times. This week is going to be a major test for the Heels though as they host rival Duke on Saturday after hosting Syracuse tonight. Gotta take care of business vs the Orange and then all eyes will be on Chapel Hill. I’m certainly not going to say this is a must win, but if they want to feel like a true contender nationally getting this one at home is the perfect way to make that statement. A 2-0 week will lead us to locking UNC I would think, but anything short of that will leave a trace of doubt going forward.

Virginia (18)

It was a tricky week for the Hoos as they looked to bounce back from a home loss to UNC. They traveled to Notre Dame and were fortunate to come away with a 2OT win over the Irish, then went to BC and came away with a close W over the bottom dwelling Eagles. Certainly not a week that will inspire much confidence, but from a resumé standpoint that’s 2 wins and more importantly they avoided adding a bad loss to the tally. I’m not sure if this is a bit of a regression to the mean after some hot play, but you it’s also hard to pick apart a team that is 18-3 and within that is an 8-3 record in Q1-2. They haven’t beaten anyone inside the top-20 aside from Louisville who was without Mikel Brown. However, they have 3 Q1(A) wins with Louisville, SMU and NC State on the road. Not sure many would realize that, but it’s one of the stronger resumé’s in the country, even though many probably have question marks about them after the last 3 games. We’re not going to see them tested for some time either, as they just get Pitt and Syracuse at home this week. 2 should be wins, so we’ll probably be close to locking next week if they handle their business. Will be one of the most interesting teams in the field if they maintain their winning ways.

Louisville (17)

louisville

I would call the last 7 days a bit of a roller-coaster for Louisville as they were feeling good with Mikel Brown back in the lineup and then absolutely got their doors blown in at Cameroon Indoor, losing by 31. That is a result that can alter seasons in a negative way, but credit to Pat Kelsey and co. as they bounced back and handled SMU at home on Saturday to steady the ship. Brown was really bad in the game @ Duke, resulting in his removal from the starting lineup vs SMU. Message received, as he came off the bench and scored 20 points in 29 minutes. One of those classic coaching moves where you send a message to a kid, and it appeared from his play that Brown understood what was expected and responded well. That’s great news for the Cards, as they have clearly been a very good team when he’s in the lineup and playing well. They have a couple of great opportunities to build on Saturday as they host Notre Dame and then go to a free-falling Wake Forest. Gotta have a 2-0 week to get the mojo back as they have a tough stretch coming up after that. In terms of resumé they still sit around the 6-7 seed line, pretty safely in but certainly don’t want to take on water at this stage.

Clemson (31)

clemson

Clemson might be the quietest power conference team that currently sits 8-1 in conference play. We’re talking teams like Michigan, Illinois, and Houston who all have just 1 loss in their respective conferences. Would you think of Clemson if that question were asked? I certainly wouldn’t expect many to, and yet here are the Tigers at 18-4 with an 8-4 Q1/2 record right now that is pretty strong. The knock as we said last week are the elite wins, but until those opportunities come all they can do is keep winning, just as they did this week winning their only game vs Pitt. That brings us to this upcoming week, as they head to California for some big time ACC matchups (still an absurd sentence to type). They get both Stanford and Cal on the road, who are both scratching and clawing down on the true bubble cut line so they are desperate for a big win against a team like Clemson. That is as perilous a trip as there is right now, going cross-country to play desperately wounded animals. If they can come away 2-0 from that we are going to be right on the doorstep of locking. Inversely, if they drop both and fall to just 1-5 in Q1 we have start having serious conversations about how far that 7-1 Q2 record is going to carry them. They will have more Q1 chances down the road, but the pressure will ramp up if they fail to capitalize this week.

SMU (34)

This is a tough one to have to report back on as SMU only had one game since we last met and it was a difficult trip to a desperate and very talented Louisville team. Based on that setup I’m sure you could guess how that went if you didn’t already know, pretty rough. They did jump out to an early lead though, showing what their talented backcourt was capable of in the first half. They managed just 27 points in the 2nd half though, losing the half 44-27 in route to a 14 point loss. Ended up ugly, but they showed early on who they can be at their best, but ultimately it’s another Q1 loss that drops them to 3-5 and just 6-6 overall in Q1/2. They’re not near the cut line yet, but they can’t afford to keep dropping Q1 games. Wins over UNC and Texas A&M are carrying them right now, but they could use more to truly feel safe. Fortunately, a top-25 NC State team comes to Dallas next, followed by a trip to Pitt. A 2-0 week would significantly quell any bubble concerns and buy some breathing room between them and the true depths of the bubble.

Teetering: 

NC State (27)

The Wolfpack have started to get things rolling here lately and it continued this week as they beat Syracuse and Wake by a combined 38 points this week, the latter of which was on the road. That gives them 4 straight wins since that embarrassing loss to GA Tech at home, a moment in the season that appears to be a rock bottom point that served as a wake up call. Derrion Williams has been back to what we expected him to be, scoring 43 points in their 2 wins, and with him rolling it’s hard not to take this NC State team seriously. That urge to do so will be tested over the coming weeks though, as their finishing stretch in the ACC is no joke, with 5 more Q1 chances at minimum. That gives them plenty of opportunity to improve that 2-6 Q1 record, which will be absolutely necessary if they want to have a chance on Selection Sunday. The trip to Dallas to face SMU is on deck, and represents a massively important game to both teams as both are looking for another feather in their cap. They then host VA Tech after that, so a split feels like the bare minimum if they want to stay on the right side of things firmly.

Virginia Tech (55)

I’m starting to have some real concerns about the Hokies actually making the dance after the missed opportunity vs Duke this weekend. That dropped them to just 1-5 in Q1, and while they’re 6-1 in Q2 it is almost never goes well on Selection Sunday for teams with just 1 Q1 win. That takes me to what is on the schedule the rest of the way. 5 of their final 8 games are road Q1 games, facing 5 of the top teams in the ACC with NC St/Clemson/Miami/UNC/Virginia on the docket. Sandwiched between those are home games that will be just Q3 must-wins. I don’t see a world they get in if they go 0-5 in those games, as a team that is just 1-10 has almost no chance. So, in order to find a way in, they need to win at minimum one of those 5 road games, with 2 really being the number I’m targeting to feel confident. That would leave them 3-8 in Q1 to go with their 6-1 in Q2, that’s a tourney team. 2-9 and 6-1, that’s fringe, and will be dependent on what the rest of the bubble does. It’s rare you can see the path so clearly for a team, but with 8 to play and such a contrast in difficulty with their games, it’s fairly simple. Go 2-3 on the road down the stretch and handle business at home and they’re in. It begins this week with their lone game a trip to NC State. Whether they know it or not, it’s nut cutting time for the Hokies.

Cal (51)

Just when I was ready to write Cal off after they went and lost to Florida St, they bounced back by beating Miami on the road to keep my hope in them alive. That gave them their 3rd Q1 win, making this a very tricky resumé to figure out as they have some big time wins but also just a 1-2 record in Q2 after that loss to the Seminoles. The other part of this is how favorable the schedule is down the stretch, so getting through this week at 1-1 minimum was my requirement. Now they look ahead with just 4 of 9 on the road, all against bottom half of the league teams. In all, of the 9 games remaining only 2 are Q1 so they are going to be able to go on a run and win a lot of games, and they’ll have to if they want to stay relevant. Their biggest issue is going to be that 1-2 Q2 record and their abysmal SOS number. They need to flip that above .500 to feel comfortable. They will get their chances, with a home game vs Clemson this week possibly 1 of them as the Tigers are right on the cut line of 30th in NET. They host GA Tech prior, a can’t lose game followed by a massive opportunity. This could be a major swing week, or one that puts major pressure on the rest of the season.

Miami (FL) (38)

The Canes have really put themselves in a tough spot after letting one slip away at home to Cal on Saturday. They picked up a good win earlier in the week vs Stanford and lead late vs Cal. It fell apart but in the end they had 2 chances down 1 after Cal missed some FT’s and still weren’t able to grab the lead back in the closing seconds. That loss dropped them to just 4-4 in Q1/2. 8 total games in those two quadrants is fairly unfathomable for a Power Conference team right now and for that reason they are not in my field right now (bracket matrix disagrees, but barely). Regardless of where you think they should fall, it certainly isn’t in a secure place right now, and how could it be when their best win is akin to a mid-major team being @ Wake Forest (68). So while their 17-5 record looks shiny on the surface, when you dig a little deeper there is not much substance here when it comes to the resumé. They are a prime case of needing to be big game hunting the rest of the way as they desperately need wins against good teams to actually have an at-large case. They are going to have their chances with 5 more Q1 chances yet to come, but it’s going to be a bit as this week they only have a trip to lowly BC on deck. That is a can’t-lose if they don’t want to fall even more off the pace, so hopefully we’re coming to you next week with optimism as they host UNC and go to NC State.

Outside Looking In:

Stanford (78)

I am going to officially declare Stanford in a free fall right now as they’ve lost 4 in a row and 5 of 6 overall after starting the season 13-3. We mentioned the loss of Chisom Okpara last week, and unfortunately it appears the lone win without him over UNC is going to be the exception not the rule going forward, as they are now 1-4 without him. Ebuka Okorie continues to carry the load, but without having the Robin to his Batman they just haven’t been able to hang. This week it was losses to Miami and Florida St, which dropped them to 6-5 in Q1/2, and while that sounds pretty good, we have to remember they are working against 3 losses in Q3. While I still think the committee will be willing to look past early season bad losses if good wins come in bunches afterwards, they have to be able to stop the bleeding to keep that scenario alive. They get to return home this week with a prime opportunity up next with Clemson coming to town. I’m willing to say that’s a must-win, and while the scenarios are likely still out there even with a loss, you can’t discount the mental toll 5 losses in a row would take. I think if we want to have a realistic path forward that doesn’t include major upsets on the road, we need a 2-0 week from the Cardinal this week. Beat Clemson, then slap around GA Tech and the train will be back on the tracks. Anything less than that and we’re looking at a disaster scenario.


–Big Ten–

Locks:

michigan
Proj. 1
nebraska
Proj. 2
illinois
Pr. 2
sparty
Proj. 3

On the Right Track:

Purdue (8)

purdue-4

We may have seen a Purdue team bottom out this past week as they lost their 3rd in a row, this time to rival Indiana on the road. It felt like the sky was falling if you were plugged into the Boilermaker fanbase, but the Boilers bounced back by dropping the hammer on Maryland in a 30 point rout to settle everyone down. The biggest takeaway from the big win was seeing Fletcher Loyer return to form, as the sharpshooter had been receiving most of the heat during the rough stretch as he went 4-17 from 3. On Sunday he knocked down 7 threes on 10 attempts, and if that is him breaking out of his slump then we may really have this team back to it’s top form. From a resumé perspective it’s important to point out that every game matters equally, so while the 3 in a row seemed bleak, overall they are still entering the week 6-4 in Q1 which has them still solidly on the 3 line right now. They have a long break as they don’t play again until Saturday, with another easy one on deck with a wounded Oregon coming to West Lafayette. Ideally, we’re coming to you next week with Purdue still sitting at 8-4 in Q1/2 and staring down the barrel of road trips to Iowa and Nebraska. That’s where we’re going to find out how they’ve truly bounced back from the low point.

Iowa (20)

The Hawkeyes continued to roll this week as they pulled off a wild victory over USC in the dying moments at home and then went to Eugene and smacked around Oregon. They have perfectly embodied new HC Ben McCollum’s style as they play at a snails pace and just try to out execute you in the halfcourt. That style is working, and with Bennett Stirtz leading the way they are in pretty good shape to make the tourney in year 1. The only thing they’re missing right now to feel extra secure are the Q1 wins, as they just have the 1 @ Indiana to their name. Overall they are 6-5 in Q1/2 but to truly feel safe come Selection Sunday they are going to want to beef that Q1 win total up no doubt. This week presents a giant opportunity as they head to a feisty Washington team, looking for a big time win in their own right, so finding a way to win that would go a long way. A loss would push them closer to the cut line, despite being 20th in the NET, as they could find themselves in bigger trouble sporting just 1 high quality win. They host Northwestern after that, so 1-1 minimum to keep the Hawkeyes from the true danger zone, but they’re going to have bigger chances down the road, so no need to panic if they do fall in Seattle.

Teetering: 

Wisconsin (41)

wisconsin

The Badgers certainly played with their food this week as they had what looked on paper like 2 fairly simple home games but right out the gates they fell down 20 to Minnesota. They battled back and pulled out a victory, riding the backs of John Blackwell and Nick Boyd who both scored over 20. They handled Ohio St a little easier, and it was that same duo carrying the load, but that Minnesota game had to have been a red flag for that locker room as you simply can’t come out that flat in Conference play, they got lucky to squeak that one out. Right now they are still being buoyed by that road win over Michigan, which continues to be the best win on the Watch, but sitting at just 1 Q1 win is going to grow increasingly concerning as other teams start to pass them in that win total. The rest of the resumé is strong, with a 6-1 Q2 record really jumping out, but I’m looking for this group to add a key win or 2 down the stretch before I feel overly confident. This week they have a big test in that regard, as they play just once @ Indiana. The Hoosiers are getting hot, but are still desperate to win games and climb into the field, so that’s a tough one that could drop them to 1-6 in Q1. If that happens, pressure will be mounting as we get deeper into February.

USC (48)

What a wild week for the Trojans as they started off the week with an absolutely bonkers game @ Iowa in which they led at halftime, got down by as much as 17 in the 2nd half, only to roar all the way back to take a late lead with 8 seconds left. They proceeded to lose that one, in spite of the fact Kam Woods had 33 points, more than his 23 total points on the season! Insanely bizarre game that ultimately just stacked up another Q1 loss for the Muss Bus. They returned home and battled a feisty Rutgers team and picked up a win they had to have as they continue to try and steady the ship in Big 10 play. 3 of their 4 Big 10 wins right now are over Minnesota/Maryland/Rutgers, so it hasn’t exactly been a success so far in January, but they’re holding on to some good wins in the non-con to stay afloat. This week is an important week, not because it presents golden opportunities but it gives them 2 games they really should win if they are who they think they are. First they host a white hot Indiana team, and then they go to Penn St. The Hoosiers have won multiple in a row but are playing their 2nd game in LA so I think that favors the Trojans on Tuesday night. Then is the cross-country trip to Penn St, who is a sleeping giant, with emphasis on the sleeping. They have only won 1 Big 10 game, so calling them that seems ridiculous, but they have played Michigan St, Michigan, Purdue, Illinois and Ohio St all to single digit games. They are not a team you want to take lightly, even at 1-10 in league play. An 0-2 week would be catastrophic, and even 1-1 would be disappointing and likely drop them square into the cut line of the bubble.

UCLA (44)

ucla

I honestly don’t know what to make of this UCLA team as they seemingly had it rolling as they knocked off Oregon in Eugene to make it 5 wins out of their last 6 games. Then they went back to Westwood and lost a 2 OT thriller to IU. Should we be disappointed? I’m not sure, because that one could have easily gone the other way multiple times and we’d be sitting here talking about the Bruins winning 6 of 7. Clear eyes tell us it’s just a blip, and with Donovan Dent continuing his strong play of late I do think they’ve still rounded that corner and should be a solid tourney team come Selection Sunday. However, they still have work to do, and that loss to IU was a resumé setback as they fell to just 5-7 overall in Q1/2 with just 2 Q2 wins. Work yet to be done to say the least and they head into this week with 2 very winnable home games on deck. Only one of them will carry much weight as they host Rutgers first but the matchup with Washington is a chance to improve the Q2 record. Ultimately, every win counts right now, as even a Q3/4 win is at least avoiding adding a black stain to the resumé.

Indiana (30)

indiana

As much as I hate to type this, noo team on the Watch had a better week than the Indiana Hoosiers. They first knocked off Purdue at home to notch an all-important Q1 win and then flew out to LA and followed that up with a Q1 win @ UCLA in 2 OT. The story of the improved play has to begin and end with the emergence of Nick Dorn, who has been on fire from beyond the arc making 16 three balls during this 3 game winning streak. That has catapulted them into as high as the First Four in Dayton as they now sit 3-7 in Q1/2 after barely being in the discussion at just 1-7 last week. The home win over Purdue gives them the signature Q1(A) win we’re always looking for as well, so that is going to set them apart from some of the other close bubble teams they’re jockeying for position with. They stay out in LA to begin the week as they play USC, another Q1 chance and then come home to face Wisconsin. The game against the Badgers is very important because that Q2 record sitting at just 1-1 is a real weak point. Picking up that win, even if they lose to the Trojans, will be huge as they try and salvage their at-large hopes. Obviously, staying hot and going 2-0 would do wonders, but realistically splitting that trip to LA is a huge win and then holding serve at home keeps this thing heading in the right direction.

Ohio St (40) 

buckeyes

Ohio St didn’t really do anything to alter their position on the bubble this past week as they took care of business against Penn St at home and then lost to Wisconsin in Madison. That loss was the epitome of their season as they continue to not be able to get stops against high level competition, as they now sit 77th in Def efficiency and 199th in 2-point FG% allowed. So, if anything, their case got a little weaker as they fell to 1-6 in Q1 and just 4-7 in Q1/2 overall. They are probably being better received than they should be at this point because right now the resumé is a lot closer to that of a mid-major than a power conference team when you’re looking at the top wins. They have a road win over Northwestern who is barely clinging to top-75 and then just one top-50 win at home vs UCLA. That is very weak, so there is mounting pressure on the Buckeyes to find a big time win to bring to the table on Selection Sunday. This week they go to Maryland, one you have to win and won’t do much but stain your resumé if you lose, and then they host rival Michigan. That’s one you have to have circled as they played the Wolverines close in Ann Arbor so adding an elite win like that is exactly what they need. A loss leaves us in the exact same situation.

Outside Looking In:

Washington (47)

The Huskies are the first new addition to the Watch this week as I dug a bit more into their current resumé and their remaining schedule and a glimmer of hope was spotted. Right now they are decently far out of the conversation at just 12-10, but the win @ Northwestern this weekend gave them a fighting chance as they moved to 5-10 in Q1/2. They have very strong SOS numbers and frankly when you look outside of Q1(A) they’re 12-4, which should be a woah moment. We’re comparing them to teams who haven’t even played a Q1(A) game much less won one, so going 0-6 there shouldn’t be a disqualifier. What they have in front of them is the chance to rip off a lot of wins in a row, as the final 7 games are all very winnable, with only 3 road trips to Rutgers, Maryland and Oregon to come. They would get Penn St/Minnesota at home, there’s 5 wins getting them to 17 total, and then host Wisconsin and USC to push them to 19 potentially, adding 2 more Q2 wins. For those savvy fans out there, I’m intentionally leaving out 2 games, as there are 9 to play. Those are both this week. My path to a Washington Huskies at-large ticket getting punched has have a 1-1 split this week I believe, as they host Iowa and then go to UCLA. I think they need to get a 3rd Q1 win to have a chance, and these are there final 2 before a potential opportunity in the Big 10 tourney. So, to recap, they need to go 8-1 over their final 9 games, and while that sounds like a tall mountain to clime, 5 of those are against the bottom-6 teams in the conference. Season comes down to winning 3 out of 4 vs Iowa/USC/UCLA/Wisconsin, 3 of which are in your home building. It’s a daunting task sure, but Danny Sprinkle if you’re reading this I see the path my friend. It all hinges on this week though, gotta find a way to win a ballgame.


–Big 12–

Locks: 

arizona
Proj. 1
iowast
Proj. 2
houston
Proj. 2

On the Right Track:

Kansas (14)

kansas

While the answer to our all important Darryn Peterson question was not really answered on Saturday, his return for the 1st half against BYU exemplified why it’s so important. He was absurdly good, and helped the Jayhawks build a 20 point halftime lead. They unfortunately blew that lead after he was forced to exit once again with “cramps” in his legs early in the 2nd half. In the end, they were able to hold on and get a huge W over the Cougars at home, but it is clear how high their ceiling can be if this kid can find a way through whatever it is that’s preventing him from playing a full game. They have a quick turnaround with another monster matchup as they head to Lubbock to face a Tech team coming off a loss tonight. That’s followed by an easy one at home vs Utah, so 1-1 on the week should be the bare minimum, with a chance to make a major statement if they can take down the Red Raiders. As of now, they sit pretty firmly on the 4 line as they have 4 Q1 wins and are 11-5 overall in Q1/2. If they can continue to build on their current 5 game winning streak they will keep on flying up the seed list as they continue to emerge as a real threat nationally.

Texas Tech (19)

tx tech

Texas Tech has a fantastic resumé right now, with 3 elite wins over Duke/Houston/BYU, but they did take a hit when they went to Orlando on Saturday and lost to UCF. The issue in their losses has been defense and that cropped up once again as they let UCF score 88 points on just 69 possessions. That on top of losing the possession battle by 16 and you have a pretty clear picture as to why they lost. Ultimately all that means is they dropped from a potential 3 seed down to the 4 line, but they have an immediate chance to bounce back as they welcome Kansas to their home building. Picking up yet another Q1 win to get them up to 5 total would get us very close to locking this up, especially if they go to Morgantown later in the week and handle West Virginia. A loss in either one of those would keep them below .500 in Q1, and while I can’t really imagine a team with 5 Q1 wins missing out, we’re always one injury or catastrophic collapse from it at least being interesting come Selection Sunday. No matter the stakes, it is going to be must-watch college hoops tonight in Lubbock when the Jayhawks come to town.

BYU (15)

byu

You certainly have to have a few more questions about this BYU team after the last couple of weeks have seen them lost to Texas Tech, Arizona and most recently Kansas. They battle back well against both Arizona and Kansas this week, but ultimately it goes down as an 0-2 week in Q1, as close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. The concern you start to have is they haven’t beaten an elite team, going 0-4 against top-30 opponents. They still have the 4 Q1 wins, but right now you could very fairly call them a bit of a paper tiger, even though they have AJ Dybantsa and plenty of talent around him. On paper, they should be able to compete with the top teams in the sport, but we just haven’t seen them put it together for a full 40 minutes and get it done. Lucky for them, they’ll get 2 more chances this week as the gauntlet that is this year’s Big 12 keeps on swinging, as they head to Oklahoma St and then host Houston. A 2-0 week would shut up all the people who may be doubting this group right now, as beating this year’s Houston team is no easy feat, and exactly the type of win they need to cement themselves at the top of the sport.

UCF (37)

ucf

The win on Saturday for the Knights has put this UCF team in prime position to get back to the dance for the first time since 2019 as they now have 3 very solid wins, at home vs Kansas/Texas Tech and @ Texas A&M. Two of those are good for Q1(A) status and they have 0 losses outside of Q1 so it’s squeaky clean right now and very solid at the top end. The story here continues to be Themus Fulks who is now on his 4th school in 5 years but having a career year after bouncing around the mid-major ranks. He had 21 points and 7 assists in the win over Tech as he continues to make a surprise case for an All-Conference bid. All of this positivity could come crashing down though as this week presents 2 tough road challenges, as they head to Houston and then Cincy. Now, one of those is not quite like the other, but still Cincy is very good defensively and has won their last 3 home games, including an upset of Iowa St. Lose both of those games and we’re sliding the Knights back to somewhat rocky ground at just 3-6 in Q1, but I still look at the top flight wins and can’t see them dropping too far down the seed list as they are in the 6-7 range right now. A truly unbelievable season thus far, and honestly just finding a way to go 1-1 this week would be enough to keep this thing right on track.

Teetering: N/A

Outside Looking In:

TCU (54)

What a disappointing week for the Horned Frogs as they fought tooth and nail at home to try and steal one from Houston, ultimately coming up short, and then went out to Colorado and got absolutely boat raced. Jamie Dixon has to be upset with the effort on Sunday, as the team that went nose to nose with Houston should not be getting beat by 26 vs Colorado, I don’t care where it’s played. The effort simply wasn’t there, and frankly they were beat from pillar to post and should be embarrassed by that effort. Hopefully that is a moment they can learn from and not let it be the unraveling, and they’re lucky enough to not play again until Saturday when they host K-State. That’s a must-win at this stage, especially after this recent performance you have to do something to get the belief back. They still have those wins over Florida/Wisconsin/Baylor away from home, but they’re also working against a Q3 and 4 loss so it’s going to take more than just 5-7 in Q1/2 to get themselves in position for an at-large. They slid way back this week, but there’s still 9 Big 12 games on the schedule, with plenty of chances to turn this thing around. Just have to get back rolling.

Oklahoma St (67)

Oklahoma St did what they had to do in beating Utah to continue lingering around in the conversation, but without that signature Q1 win (0-4) they are still a decent ways out of this thing. They do have a couple of solid wins over UCF and Texas A&M, but neither of those teams are top-30 and their best win away from home is Grand Canyon, with their best road win being the one they just picked up @ Utah. Not a strong case that they’re making, especially considering the non-con SOS is an abysmal 271st. That all would take a dramatic turn if they could pick off BYU at home this week, or beat Arizona in their building but I don’t think we even need to consider that happening at this point. BYU has to be the target, but unfortunately the Cougars are going to be hungry to get back in the win column after dropping 2 straight to Arizona and Kansas last week. Not a great time to face them, you’d much rather face a Cougar who’s fat and happy than hungry and desperate. Either way, the Pokes should be even more desperate, as falling to 0-5 with a trip to Zona likely sending them to 0-6 in Q1 is just going to see them fade further into the darkness.

Baylor (56)

The Baylor Bears have a pulse! Just as I was about to prepare the casket and inform the families, Baylor went into Morgantown and knocked off West Virginia to add another Q1 victory and end their 4 game losing streak. It’s still only 2 wins in their last 9 games, but if only temporarily, they have slowed the bleeding. Cam Carr and Obi Agbim lead the way offensively, but it was the defensive effort that shocked me the most as they had been dreadful on that end but held WVU to just 53 points. That of course was on the heels of the loss @ Cincy earlier in the week, so in total it was just a 1-1 split on the road, but that’s enough to keep them on the Watch a bit longer as they still do sport a 5-9 record in Q1/2. The SOS numbers are very strong, and the 3 Q1 wins stand out in this bubble environment. Granted, none of them are over top-40 opponents, but we’re not talking about a team that’s in the field, merely just hanging around and needing to go on a run. They have another must-win with Colorado coming to Waco and then they have a near impossible task as they go to Iowa St. We’re just looking for a 1-1 week to stay alive.

West Virginia (66)

The Mountaineers hopes for an at-large are now on life support, and honestly if they weren’t in the Big 12 with all of these opportunities ahead of them, I would have already pulled the plug. What I wanted to see from them this week was to handle their business at home, and they did that early in the week beating K-State. Then they let a reeling Baylor team walk into Morgantown and take their lunch money. Not good enough, and frankly at 2-8 in Q1/2 it’s kind of an abomination they are on the Watch at all, but that is the nature of the bubble this year. It could just be that the win over Kansas was just fool’s gold, but when you flash that kind of ability you get a longer leash around here. This week they go to Cincy and then host Texas Tech. You just have to win both right now if you’re the Mountaineers. There are too many teams in the mid-major ranks carrying strong Q2-4 records to stick around the conversation if you’re not cashing in on these opportunities.


–Big East–

Locks:

uconn
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

St. John’s (24)

st john's

The Johnnies could very well be hitting their stride, as the recent pounding of Butler at home gave them their 7th win in a row. As we discussed last week, it was a rocky road out of the gates but it seems Pitino has his tight 8 man rotation pretty much nailed down as we steamroll into February. Dillon Mitchell has been the story of late, exemplified by his 14 pts, 13 rebs and 4 asts the other night vs Butler. If he is putting up that stat line in the front court next to Zuby Ejiofor all of a sudden this becomes a scary dominant group up front. This week presents the ultimate test in the Big East though as they host UConn. That is the true measuring stick as the Huskies have just 1 loss on the season, to undefeated Arizona, so if St. John’s can knock off Hurley and co. that will be the indicator that they must be taken serious nationally. What they can’t allow to happen is to be looking too far ahead the way I am, as they still have to go to DePaul Tuesday night before the UConn game. St. John’s is on a great track, and a 2-0 week would put them on firm ground for the dance. There’s that chance though they get caught with their pants down and lose to DePaul and then can’t get it done against UConn. Then we’re looking at a trip down to the muddy bubble waters.

Villanova (33)

Unfortunately for Nova weeks like these are actually not great as teams all around them are picking up impactful wins while they simply beat Providence at home to stand pat at just 5-5 in Q1/2. They also have the issue of not having a single win over teams in the top-40 of the NET, so while they have a great record at 16-5 overall, it is somewhat reminiscent of those weak ACC or the MWC resumé’s we’re seeing. It doesn’t get much better this week unfortunately, as they host Seton Hall and then go to Georgetown. Those aren’t easy games by any means, but they are merely Q2 games that at this point they have to have but don’t address the key hole in their resumé. February 21st is going to be the date we have circled for Nova, as if they can avoid the land mines prior to that point then a win in the rematch with UConn would be exactly what the doctor ordered and make me feel very good about their case. There is a lot of work to be done prior to that point, so we’ll look for a 2-0 week that would boost them to 7-5 in Q1/2, keeping the wolves at bay as try and keep that gap between them and the true cut line.

Teetering:

Seton Hall (49)

You have to consider this week for Seton Hall as big as any that they’ve had all season, as they came into the week absolutely reeling after losing 4 in a row. They were able to bounce back with 2 massive wins at home, and while they were merely Q3 wins over bottom dwellers in the conference, it had to be a relief to get back in the W column. 5’10” guard Budd Clark was the story in the 2 wins as he had a combined 43 points, 10 rebounds 10 assists and 6 steals in the 2 games. If they get that level of Adam Clark the rest of the way things will be looking up in Jersey as they are desperate for a consistent scorer to go with their lockdown defense. Now, all of this positivity is about to be put to the test as they hit the road this week, playing Nova and Creighton. Those are not going to be easy, but they really need to find a way to steal one of those to not fall further out of this thing. The trip to Creighton is obviously going to be more attainable, and while it may end up being just a Q2 victory they can’t afford to drop a 4th Q2 game if that’s where Creighton is going to fall. Right now, they’re out, so while it seems like asking a lot the Big East isn’t offering a lot of opportunities, so the Pirates need to start capitalizing before it’s too little too late. After this, it’s really only St John’s/UConn. Now is the time to strike.

Outside Looking In:

Butler (64)

Well, if last week Butler’s at-large hopes were hanging on to the edge of a cliff, they just lost their grip with one hand and are down to one singular hand holding on for dear life. That is thanks to a home loss to Georgetown which saw them miss their final 14 shots from the field. That took their ugly 4-8 Q1/2 record and added a Q3 loss to the mix. I know that this thing is bleak and they are probably the farthest team out of it on the watch, but my hometown small college still has a viable path and damnit I’m going to hold on to it. They have 2 must-win road games this week as they head to Providence and Marquette. Those are not easy trips, but if you want to make the tournament those are simply games you have to win. They won’t even add much to the resumé, but quietly they could improve their Q2 record to 4-4 which would bring them one step closer to clawing their way back into the conversation. After that they host UConn and Seton Hall. This is a 4 game stretch where they have to be playing like their lives depend on it, and nothing short of 3-1 will do. If they can manage that, they could jump to 7-9 in Q1/2 with 5 games to play. That’s the short terms path to staying alive right now. Do I have confidence? How could you after the loss to G’Town, but I have hope and that’s what we’re here to provide in bunches.


–SEC–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track:

Vanderbilt (13)

For those that had major questions about this Vandy team I think you can go ahead and take a seat and consider them answered after they completely undressed Kentucky in Nashville. That 25 point drubbing was about all I needed to see to say, okay, I think they’re going to be just fine. They did it without Duke Miles as well, with Tyler Tanner continuing to shine as he took on more of the load in the back court as he had 19 against UK and then 24 later in the week in their win over Ole Miss. That’s now 3 W’s in a row after that little slip in January that saw them lose 3 straight, so a very nice bounce back and what looks to be a rock solid resumé forming. They still have just 5 Q1 wins, only one of which is Q1(A) and only 2 of those being top-30 opponents though, so a collapse would still make this interesting. I don’t think it’s going to happen, but again I’m trying to keep all scenarios alive, not just the one’s I believe to be likely. This week may be enough to move them to locking as they just host Oklahoma. The Sooners play everyone tough and then lose late, so as long as the Dores at least continue that trend we’ll see them move to an impressive 12-3 in Q1/2. Certainly enough to lock with 20 wins, even with a tough homestretch still to come. A loss brings back the doubters, but that would be the most insane results of the season, so I’m not betting on it.

Florida (12)

florida

Last week I was pretty cloudy when it came to my opinion on the Gators, as they were on such a roll prior to losing at home to Auburn. That one stopped me in my tracks, a proverbial wrench in the bike tire. However, this week was a clarifying showing as they went to S. Carolina and won by a staggering 47 points and then returned home to blowout Bama by 23. Quite the response, and it has sent them surging up to 7th in Kenpom. They are now 7-1 in their last 8 games, with the computers looking at them as the best team in the SEC right now. All of that said they are still only around the 4-5 seed range when it comes to a resumé so they either are going to be a nightmare for a 1 seed to see in their region or maybe they’ll climb up if they continue to dominate SEC teams. They will get a chance to improve on their 4-6 Q1 record this week as they head to Texas A&M, who is shockingly pacing the SEC right now at 7-1. A monster showdown in College Station as 1st and 2nd place in the league go toe-to-toe with 1st place on the line.

Arkansas (23)

I was really starting to buy in on this young Arkansas team, especially after they went to Oklahoma in a trap spot leading up to the Kentucky game and pulled off a big win. That showed a maturity not often seen in college, but they then turned around and lost their composure in the UK game and showed that youth as they fell to Kentucky in a contentious and sloppy game in Fayetteville. That loss dropped them down to 4-6 in Q1 right as they started surging up the seed list, and they now sit somewhere around the 5 seed line. They still have a ton of promise, but their lack of ability on defense was exposed again in that UK game and it’s just too much for their young FR guard duo to overcome at times. They have a nice break before they head to the punching bag of the conference in Mississippi St, so that break mixed with an easier game represents a good opportunity to settle back down and bounce back. In due time it certainly feels like we’ll be able to lock these Razorbacks in, but for now we will want to see that 7-6 overall record in Q1/2 climb up as it really is being carried by the 2 Q1(A) wins over Vandy/Texas Tech.

Alabama (22)

Alabama is taking on water right now as Nate Oats seems to be losing control of this thing. Maybe I’m being a bit hyperbolic, as they did beat the brakes off of Mizzou earlier in the week, but I can’t seem to shake that blowout loss at the hands of Florida Sunday. That was an ugly loss that you just aren’t used to seeing an Alabama team take under Oats. They almost always can go blow for blow with teams, even if that means losing 95-90 they are always still in the game. Losing 100-77 is not the norm, so while they’re still in a fine position in terms of getting into the dance at 9-7 in Q1/2, it’s only sitting at 3-6 in Q1. In other years that could be cause for concern, but in a year like this where those last 8-10 teams getting in aren’t anywhere close to the wins of the Tide I’m not worried about them getting in. My doubt is about what they do once they’re there, but that’s for another series on this site, here we’re talking resumé and they do have wins over Illinois/St. John’s away from home and UK at home. Those will continue to buoy them even if they keep dropping Q1 games, but eventually if they fall to like 3-11 what does that look like? I don’t think it’ll get that bad, but they have lost 3 straight Q1 games with another Q2 loss sprinkled in there. Needless to say, they need to turn it around, and they’ll have chances to do so this week as they host A&M and then go to rival Auburn. 2 more losses and we may have to hit the panic button on the Tide.

Tennessee (21)

vols

Uh ohhhhh has Rick Barnes finally gotten this team clicking as we steamroll into February? My eyes tell me they’ve turned a corner recently as they have picked up 3 straight wins, all of which are Q1 right now. This week it was a trip to Georgia that they pulled out an OT W after trailing by 6 at halftime and then they came home to beat Auburn. Freshmen sensation Nate Ament seems to be hitting his stride as he has averaged 23 ppg during this little streak. While they still aren’t the same scary team defensively we’ve seen under Barnes, they’re capable and tough on the glass as always, ranking #1 in offensive rebound rate. That’s been the formula, get enough stops and be absolute terrors on the glass, so even when shots aren’t falling they’re getting 2nd and 3rd chances. In terms of resumé they have jumped up to 5-6 in Q1 after being just 2-6 a couple of weeks ago, quite the rise and quite the jump from fringe bubble team to solidly in the field right now. This week they should stay hot in the short term as they host Ole Miss but then they head to rival Kentucky. They let the Wildcats come to Knoxville and steal one, so you know revenge is on their mind, making that one must-watch on Saturday.

Kentucky (28)

kentucky

This has to be one of the more trying seasons on the collective heart of BBN in a long time, as this team will have lows that drop you to the depths of the Earth, only to bounce back and deliver the highest of highs a regular season game can offer. What I’m talking about is UK going into Fayetteville and knocking off former HC John Calipari in his new home. Whether or not UK fans are happy with him, they certainly all would admit that win fired them up. Not only that, the timing of it being on the heels of another embarrassing effort @ Vandy had to bring back some hope for the season. It was looking gloomy once again after that 25 point drubbing in Nashville, at the hands of Vandy no less, so I’m here to acknowledge the roller coaster BBN is on right now and offer absolutely zero sympathy, you have had your fun, welcome to normalcy. Back to the macro point though here as the resumé got far better with that win bringing them to 5-6 in Q1. They still have that pedestrian 1-1 record sitting in Q2, but if they can pile up a few more wins over there those 3 Q1(A) wins inside Q1 are going to be perfectly enough to make this conversation more about how high they can go vs if they get in. This week they host Oklahoma and then Tennessee, the latter of which will have the nation’s attention as the Vols look for revenge. The Cats have to at bare minimum beat the Sooners at home, but you know they want that season sweep of the Vols. Pick that up, and we’ll be racing to lock territory after having major question marks about UK just a few weeks ago.

Auburn (29)

auburn

Auburn has played the toughest schedule in the country so far according to the NET, so we have to keep that in mind as we’re looking at a team sitting on 8 losses right now. Yes, that is much higher than some of the teams I have teetering, but they’ve played 8 Q1(A) games for crying out loud, we have to credit them for winning 2 of those at least. You take out that 2-6 record in Q1(A) and you’re looking at a 12-2 team outside of that. There are teams who have played 0 or 1 or 2 of those games total and hardly have 2 wins there. That is why Auburn is safe, and why we won’t be getting negative around here after they dropped on in Knoxville this week. Tough place to play and a really good team, and it came on the heels of a nice home win over a desperate Texas team so they’re still rolling as far as I’m concerned. They have a nice break and then they host in-state rival Bama who is licking their wounds after a beat down @ Florida. Bama gets a chance to get right prior, but still this is a massive chance to knock off your rival and swing positioning with them potentially as they would rise to 5-7 in Q1 alone. They’re in the midst of a brutal stretch, with 3 more Q1 games coming make it 6 out of 7 in that category. Make it out alive and it eases up with some of the bottom dwellers in this conference.

Teetering:

Texas A&M (35)

a&m

The Aggies continued their winning ways this week as they went to Georgia and won comfortably to move to 7-1 now in conference play. They are now in a similar category as Clemson as they quietly are sitting in a power conference with just 1 loss, and crazily are still in the teetering category. Allow me to explain. While they do have 7 SEC wins, they had little to no meat on the non-conference bone, as their best win was a Q2 road win over Pitt (114th). So, they were starting way behind the 8 ball, and in total have only added 3 Q1 wins during this run in the SEC. Play time is over though as this week begins the ramp up in competition as they first head to Alabama and then host a hot Florida team. Those are both Q1(A) games right now so finding a way to even split those games is going to be both challenging and honestly paramount to avoid slipping down into more perilous territory. Teams have gotten hammered over the past few years for playing weak non-con schedules, especially those in the bottom half of the seed list, so the Aggies don’t want to be anywhere close to the cut line as that could be a hit that sinks them. I don’t see them there currently, but they have some tough tests the rest of the way. Have to capitalize on 1 or 2 more chances to really feel safe.

Georgia (36)

The Dawgs are starting to lose their grip on this thing as they have now lost 3 in a row to fall down the seed list into real dangerous territory. The OT loss to Tennessee is going to haunt them as they had chances to win it and just couldn’t get it done. That disappointment and fatigue may have carried over into their next one as they lost another home tilt vs A&M to fall to 3-4 in Q1. They do have the benefit of being 7-4 overall in Q1/2 which is a pretty strong record, it’s just at the top end they’re lacking that elite Q1(A) win and they also have that Q3 loss at home to Ole Miss hanging out there. In all 5 losses they’ve given up over 85 points, so that’s clearly a weak point, and while they play one of the fastest tempos in the Country 60th in Def efficiency is clearly a weak point. That will have to be the focus, but overall they’re still in a decent position to get into the field again, it’s just going to have to include more tough wins as the SEC is brutal once again this year. They only play once this week but it’s another Q1 chance as they head to LSU. The Tigers are down pretty bad at just 2-7 in SEC play, so that is one you absolutely have to have or else that would be 4 losses in a row and a potential free fall diagnosis will be in order. Stop the bleeding and keep it moving.

Texas (39)

texas

The Longhorns stay alive as they were able to go to Norman in part 1 of the Red River Shootout and got a big Q2 win after falling @ Auburn earlier in the week. Dailyn Swain continues to be a revelation as he put up 18/10/6 in the win over the Sooners, helping the Longhorns keep pace with the other bubble teams, and even pass a few who didn’t capitalize. We’re going to quickly turn our eyes forward for this group as the upcoming stretch feels as important as it is unremarkable. They host S. Carolina and Ole Miss this week, 2 games I’m calling can’t lose as they both won’t even qualify as Q2. They can’t afford to take on water at this point with Q3 losses. They then go to Mizzou who is very beatable and then host LSU. This next 4 game stretch at minimum has to be a 3-1 stretch Texas to keep try and fight there way onto the right side of things. As of writing this, they’re the first team out per Bracket Matrix. I have them in, some don’t. It’s that close right now. Every game is important right now, even if it’s just to avoid a disastrous loss. They end with a brutal 4 of 5 Q1 stretch, so stacking up some wins over the next 2 weeks is as important to this team as any team fighting on the bubble, because if you can’t do it now, are you really going to do it against Arkansas, A&M, Georgia and Florida?

Outside Looking In:

Missouri (70)

Mizzou pretty much did exactly what we thought they would do this week, as they went to Tuscaloosa and got blown out and then came back to Columbia and beat Mississippi St. Didn’t really do much for them as they just dropped another Q1 game and frankly fell a bit further out of it if anything at all. This is a gross resumé to try and place because they have 3 fantastic wins over Florida/UK/Auburn, but that 0-3 record is alarming and has to be a nail in their coffin if the season ended today. We have teams who have fewer big time wins but I would think the committee would look at the overall 3-7 record in Q1/2 and see a very inconsistent team that got hot a couple of times, not really a season worth rewarding right now. The good news is there is time to improve that record, and getting it to at least 2-3 or 3-3 feels necessary to getting fully back into the conversation. A great first step in doing that would be going to S. Carolina and winning. Actually, I’m saying it’s a can’t-lose game for the Tigers as they absolutely can’t afford to drop to 0-4 in Q2. Light the resumé on fire if that happens. You jump to 1-3 there and you have life.


–Mountain West–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Utah St (26)

utahst

Utah St keeps on trending in the right direction as they won a very important matchup against San Diego St on Saturday to tie the Aztecs atop the Mountain West standings. The game was an absolute grind, just the way you’d think it would be against a Brian Dutcher squad. MJ Collins and Mason Falslev couldn’t buy a bucket, but the hero on the day was Karson Templin off the bench who was a major spark with 18 points and 7 boards. That was a game they absolutely had to have as it marks their highest ranked opponent that they’ve beaten. Still not an overly impressive resumé but they won’t apologize for being 17-3 and 6-2 overall in Q1/2. They still have the problem of having no wins in Q1(A) and in fact are one of those teams I’ve referred to previously as they haven’t even played a Q1(A) game much less won one. In my opinion they are walking a fine line right now, as the rest of the power conference teams around them have chances to pick up high quality wins. They can do so much for themselves this week if they can go to New Mexico and pick up a win though. Otherwise they would fall to a measly 1-4 in Q1 with only a couple of chances remaining.

San Diego St (45)

sdsu

The Aztecs fought valiantly, short handed at that, but couldn’t quite get it done when they visited Utah St on Saturday. At the end of the day they couldn’t quite score enough, and missing Elzie Harrington certainly played a role in that. Whatever the case, it still goes down as a Q1 loss, dropping them to just 1-4 in those games. All of these Mountain West resumés look very similar, with not much meat on the Q1 bone but really strong outside of there, especially in the upper Q2 sections. That’s where this ties in to the opener of this week’s watch as we’re likely staring down the question of the mid-major resumés vs the power conference teams who have a ton of losses but they have those signature wins. It’s a tough question to answer, and one that generally has gone the way of the power conference teams in the past, but this year those teams are especially weak. That gives teams like San Diego St a fighting chance, and they still have 6 more Q1/2 chances to beef this thing up. They have the non-con SOS to help boost them, but there’s no question they need to add more W’s down the stretch. This week is just survive and advance as they host Wyoming and then go to Air Force. No disrespect to the troops, but this should be an easy 2-0 week to set up a string of 6 high leverage games in a row.

New Mexico (42)

unm

New Mexico just got through a ho-hum week with 2 road wins that didn’t do much for the resumé other than to avoid disaster as they beat UNLV and San Jose St. On to the next one as the Lobos look to try and beef up their resumé that looks almost identical to San Diego St with a 6-3 record in Q1/2. They welcome in both Utah St and Boise St this week, with the former being a massive Q1 chance at home based on where the Aggies are in the NET. This is one of those weeks where if you can go 2-0 you really position yourself in such a better spot than if you fail to come away with W’s. They have a chance to jump to 8-3 in Q1/2 which would be really strong, adding a 2nd Q1 win and their first over a top-30 opponent. They have a decent non-con win over Santa Clara as well and they have at least played 1 Q1(A) game with the loss to Nebraska so they didn’t just skirt the non-con entirely. All of that to say this is the biggest week left of the season given the nature of the opportunity that it presents, and the swing it could have with different results. I still have them in the dance right now, but barely, and they’ll continue to lose ground on power conference teams like Indiana, Ohio St and Texas if they start stacking wins. Can’t afford to drop Q1 chances at home, especially in a mid-major conference.

Outside Looking In:

Nevada (59)

Let’s all welcome the Wolfpack to the Watch as they weren’t included last week but find themselves the beneficiary of several power conference teams failing to do anything at all. This group is lead by a big 3 with backcourt mates Tayshawn Comer and Corey Camper leading them in scoring and Elijah Price holding things down in the front court. All 3 are transfers in their first year here so credit to Steve Alford for rebuilding this roster and getting to the point they could be in the bubble conversation after losing most of last year’s roster. I’ll be frank to this point the resumé is not worthy of an at-large berth, but they’re 5-1 in Q2 and have just the one bad loss outside of that, so while 0-4 in Q1 is ugly in this bubble environment one big win can put them right in the mix. They have that opportunity this week as they head to Boise St to try and get that elusive Q1 win. They’ve already gone 0-3 against the top-3 in the conference, so they desperately need to cash in on this opportunity if they want to stick around the conversation much longer. I had to include them though because a win in that game really does bring them close to these other MWC resumés, so they certainly have a path. Especially with Utah St and New Mexico still visiting Reno later in February. It all starts this week though, gotta get a big W.

Grand Canyon (68)

Grand Canyon presents us with a little bit more of a unique situation resumé wise as they have multiple Q1 wins they just are battling a couple of bad losses out there as well. Bryce Drew has gotten his team to play better and better as the season has wore on, overcoming that early season loss to Youngstown St to now have picked up wins over Utah St, San Diego St and Boise the last couple of weeks to surge into this conversation. They are led by Jaden Henley on offense, but their top-20 ranking defensively is the real story as they average nearly 4 blocks per game and are strong on the glass thanks to a very big front line. Overall they are 5-5 in Q1/2 with wins over Utah St and Boise representing their 2 Q1 wins, but they also have the win over San Diego St to give them 2 top-50 wins. It’s not a ton to work with but I think it’s enough if they are able to go on a run to end the season. They almost stole one this past week @ Nevada, but fell in OT, so they’re right there knocking at the door. They still host New Mexico and then go to San Diego St and Utah St down the stretch, so there will be chances to build this resumé up a bit. This week they just have to hold serve as they host Air Force (respect the troops) and then go to UNLV. Has to be a 2-0 week to set up a massive game vs New Mexico next week.


–WCC–

Locks:

zags
Proj. 3

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Saint Mary’s (32)  

smc

The Gaels were unable to go into Spokane and knock off Gonzaga, and while that is a tall feat, the loss dropped them to 0-3 in Q1. While I along with everyone else still have them in the field right now, I have them just barely in as I’m not sure how this resumé can be put over some of the teams other people in this world are. Their best win right now is over 55th ranked Virginia Tech. I would argue almost all of the above Mountain West teams have a better resumé right now than the Gaels, as even they lost @ Boise St, so I’m not sure how people think they’re on the 9-10 seed line right now other than just looking at NET ranking. The committee has repeatedly said if all you have is your NET ranking then you don’t have much, and that’s where St. Mary’s is and is going to be until the last week of February. The only Q2 chance they even have is @ Pacific, but that’s honestly not going to add much. Then the last week of the season presents them home games vs Santa Clara and then Gonzaga. I think they very well may have to go 2-0 that week to have high hopes of an at-large berth. If they enter Selection Sunday at 0-4 in Q1 with their best win being, even Santa Clara I don’t know if you can make a case the Gaels would have had a season worthy of going dancing. The pressure is on, albeit in the distant future, but they certainly can’t afford to drop any of the gimme’s on the schedule in the short term.

Santa Clara (43)

Santa Clara just keeps on humming along as they have now won 6 in a row since the loss @ Gonzaga, doing exactly what they need to do to stay in the conversation. This week they at least get a Q2 chance that will be very important not to drop as they go to Pacific. Lifting that record up to 6-1 will only help their cause, and then they go to Wazzu in a Q3 game that they also can’t afford to drop. It’s all about staying focused and surviving right now for the Broncos, as they lie in wait of their big opportunity to come the following week with the Zags coming to town. It really does just all come down to that game, as winning that would put them in prime position to get in with a monster Q1(A) win to hold over the rest of these bubble teams. A loss though, and they’ll be forced to try and win @ St. Mary’s after that to try and pick up a signature win to bring to the table. We’re simply in a wait and see mode, that quickly could take a hit if they drop one they shouldn’t. A treacherous world to live in, but when you are trying to make the dance for the first time in 30 years you have to at least be relishing even being in this position.


–A-10–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

St. Louis (16)

St. Louis was backed into a corner this week as they got down as much as 15 to George Washington at home. Robbie Avila and Trey Green combined for 45 points in the comeback effort that saw them pull a rabbit out of their hat as they outscored the Patriots 24-13 in the final 10 minutes to grab a 3 point W. They followed that up with a 31 point drubbing of Dayton to keep this train rolling as they look poised to go undefeated in the A-10 if they keep up this level of play. I’m going to stay away from how high or low I think they should be seeded and just emphasize they need to avoid adding bad losses to their resumé as they charge forward. They do have the 2-0 Q1 record with wins over Santa Clara and VCU, but neither of those teams are tourney teams right now so I think it could be closer than people realize if they don’t win the A-10 tourney. Nevertheless, there are chances still to add Q1/2 wins that they can’t look past, including this week’s trip to Davidson. Have to just keep on keeping on and we’ll all hope they can cut down the nets in the A-10 tourney so we don’t have to compare them to power conference bubble teams.

Outside Looking in:

VCU (52)

VCU did what they had to do to stay on the fringes of the conversation, as they handled their business at home vs Richmond and Loyola Chi. VCU has a couple of advantages right now in that they played a tougher schedule than most of these mid-major teams and they really don’t have a bad loss. They are just missing that signature win to really vault them into the conversation. They’re 0-5 in Q1 but 16-1 outside of that. Pretty strong, but the only real opportunity they have left prior to the conference tourney is a road trip to St. Louis. That would be a monster win that certainly would catapult them into the same discussions as the Mountain West and WCC teams. I don’t know if they have the goods to go there and upset the Billikens, but that’s the path right now, along with handling their business they way they have consistently done this year against inferior opponents. You could argue their resumé is akin to St. Mary’s right now, with the best win being VA Tech, but they don’t get the luxury of playing Gonzaga at home like the Gaels do. So, we have that Feb 20th date circled and will just hope they don’t step on any land mines between now and then.

George Mason (65)

The Patriots continue to win games they are supposed to as they continue to build that shiny overall record that is now up to 19-2 overall. Their issue is they’ve essentially played nobody as they have just a 1-2 record in Q1/2, so of all the mid-major teams on here they are the furthest away from the actual at-large conversation. What we’re looking at in terms of a path for them continues to be the final week of the season when they go to VCU and then host St. Louis. I would think they’d need both of those wins to surge into this thing with some legitimacy. They will get G. Washington on the road before then as well, so jumping to 4-2 in Q1/2 would give them a real shot if they were to fall in the A-10 tourney. 3-3 may have them in the conversation, but I would see that being a GM logo on the First 4 Out or Next 4 Out graphic on Selection Sunday. The margins are thin, but when you play absolutely zero impact competition in the non-con slate this is what you do to yourself if you want to make a run at an at-large bid. They get Duquesne and St. Joe’s this week, a must go 2-0 week yet again as they lie in wait for their opportunity to strike down the road.


–Others–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Miami (OH) (53)

The emerging story of college basketball are your Miami RedHawks who have, seemingly out of nowhere, gotten off to a 22-0 start to this season. They are a very balanced group with 5 guys averaging double figures so credit to HC Travis Steele who has recruited and developed many of these guys, with only a couple of transfers who also were here last season. It’s a great mid-major story, and nice to see considering how top heavy the sport is feeling in the portal/NIL era. Now, I hate to take the air out of the balloon, but I’m sure you’re aware at this point the schedule is Charmin soft, which unfortunately is very bad news when it comes to evaluating them for an at-large spot. I have already heard the discussions beginning to take place about what would happen if they run the table and then lose in the MAC tourney. Similar to St. Louis, I have very little hope that the committee would give an at-large spot to a team without a top-50 win. They would have benefitted greatly from a trip to Akron, but unfortunately their only matchup with them was at home and is just a Q2 win. It would be an unprecedented resumé I will admit, but it is likely they would be stacked up next to high major teams who would likely have several top-50 wins. The only way I see it happening is if it’s a close loss to Akron, and even then they need the other bubble resumé’s to be weak. We’ll of course be tracking this week by week, but I know I’ll be rooting hard for the Miami (OH) at-large conversation to be moot come Selection Sunday.

Championship DNA: Week 7 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

Now that we’re 7 weeks into this thing and teams have collected over 20 data points from individual games things are starting to settle in a bit. There are 8-9 teams that are oscillating from Elite to Great to Solid, with Nebraska emerging of latest to toe the line. Vandy is back, Virginia has faded, but overall we’ve been looking at a group with Arizona/Duke/Michigan pacing this thing for a while now. Iowa St/Houston/Gonzaga/Florida have been the next tier with a few others joining/fading. That to me looks like the top two tiers in the sport, with 3 in tier 1 and another 4 in tier 2. The one additional point I’d like to highlight is the nature of this thing not being a power ranking but a stylistic analysis of historical results. The key there would be teams like Michigan St and Illinois who from a ranking perspective are higher up than teams positioned better than them on this graph. The reason I keep harping on is vulnerabilities. Michigan St on offense and Illinois on D are both weak, which represents a reliance on one end of the floor. There have been teams able to overcome that and go deep, but with less reliability than the balanced teams like Vandy/Florida/Nebraska. That is what we’re doing here. Pointing out, with historical proof, that teams that rely on one end of the floor have a vulnerability that can crop up and burn them in a single elimination tournament.

Week 7 Thoughts:

The juggernaut tracker is off the graph as Michigan continues to be below that marker, as well as Arizona. This is a rare territory that only 5 historical teams have ever met entering the dance, so it’s not shocking they weren’t able to sustain that kind of efficiency. We also have to mention Virginia as we gassed them up the last couple of weeks, but they have faded hard as defensively they kind of regressed back to maybe who they really are. Vandy was able to reverse its fortunes as they stormed back into Great territory after dropping back-to-back games. UConn fans surely have to be realizing what we’ve been saying here for 7 weeks, as the offensive struggles are clearly an issue. They haven’t lost yet, but the Big East isn’t offering up tourney level challenges very often, and they’re still struggling. Illinois fans find themselves in the same scenario but on the other end, and while they’re playing well and are hot right now that weakness is still there. I’m also looking out for Kansas, who has slowly been creeping toward serious contender status with Darryn Peterson hopefully back and healthy for a big couple of days with Texas Tech and BYU on deck. Things are starting to settle in, but these teams aren’t done evolving, so we’ll continue to track and see you back here next Friday. Until then, enjoy the hoops.

Bubble Watch NCAAB 2026

MOST RECENT UPDATE HERE

We’re back for another year of covering all things bubble in the lead up to the wildest post-season in sports. This is the place where, for the next 8 weeks or so, we’ll attempt to bring clarity to what can be a complex and annoyingly intricate selection process. Personally, I love every bit of it, but even as a self-proclaimed bracketologist I get lost in the weeds sometimes, so maybe this column is more of a cathartic release and organizational tool for me than it is a source of joy for you but hey, I appreciate you nonetheless.

What we understand here is that every fan fighting on the bubble just wants to know there’s a chance, a little drop of hope that there’s a path to watching their team in the NCAA tournament. That’s what we hope to provide as we lay out every scenario, dig into why exactly team A may be in over team B and what I expect from the committee. A key point off the rip, I am going to be judicial in my assignment of locks – I have locked a team who missed the tourney altogether before (shoutout 2024 Oklahoma), I don’t intend on making that mistake again. Ultimately, I’m going to try and not get bogged down by what I “think” should happen and focus on everything that could. So, while it may seem obvious that team X couldn’t possibly fall apart and miss the dance, please don’t question why they aren’t locked with 19 wins in February, they could wind up being the 2024 Sooners. With that, let’s get into it.  

This season already has been quite different from what we’ve seen in the past, with a much larger group of dominant teams at the top of the sport that already have powerhouse resumé’s. That has caused a ripple effect as our fabled bubble teams have failed to rack up big time wins, opening the doors for mid-major teams like St. Louis, Miami (OH), Santa Clara and Murray St to legitimately be in the conversation, despite not having big time wins themselves. This is the most difficult conversation every year I’ve found, as the mid-majors struggle to schedule with the big boys and get left out a la 2024 Indiana St. What we may have on our hands this year are some power conference resumé’s who aren’t all that different from the mid-majors potentially vying for those spots, making for very compelling debate as this season rolls on. For some added context, last year we had just 6 power conference teams with 2 or fewer losses at this point. This year we have 12. Can’t lock em all up this early, so there may be some surprises we discuss as “bubble teams” that are really just great teams about to be locked, just not quite yet.

That my friends is the story thus far. For those new here stick with me, as I explain more about what I’m doing, vets can skip ahead with the buttons below.

So, I’m going to assign teams to 4 groups – Locks, On the Right Track, Teetering and Outside Looking In. Any team left out is not even on the radar. To avoid any confusion, let’s quickly define what I’m looking at for each.

“Locks” – Basically, these are teams I don’t see a world they don’t get in. I must admit I’m a below average gambler, see last year, so I am going to be quite stingy when it comes to assigning locks, ya better have the resumé to lose almost every game left and still get in.

“On the Right Track” – This group will range from teams who are on the precipice of getting locked down to teams who lie in the 6-7 seed range, as they’re comfortably in the field but a string of losses could send them spiraling toward the true bubble danger zone.

“Teetering” – This is the group of teams that are truly on the bubble, where every win and loss can shift where they stand and how comfortable they feel. They could range from the 8-9 seeds who look solid but are by no means safe, to the teams you find on the first 4 or next 4 out lists. 

“Outside Looking In” – These are the desperate teams, who are not close to in according to Bracket Matrix, but have enough opportunities to have a path to work themselves in.

Well, we have 67 teams on the 1st watch, and while this season gives us the most top heavy resumé’s I’ve seen in my time doing this, there are still 37 at-large bids to fill. I have provided below the Quadrant system to help contextualize what I’m referring to when discussing wins. Feels like this is getting better understood but for those confused, there it is. Each conference has a table with the team’s resumé to reference at the beginning, for your own comparison, including the locks. Also worth mentioning, any of these teams can get their way in by winning the Conference tourney, I’m assuming with all of these blurbs they will need an at-large bid. For a breakdown of the available bubble spots see below, as we have 67 teams on the first watch, but many of those will be missing out. So without further ado, let’s get it. All info as of 1/27. Check out my current bracket projection here

Quadrant 1 (Q1)Quadrant 2 (Q2)Quadrant 3 (Q3)Quadrant 4 (Q4)
Home (1-30)Home (31-75)Home (76-160)Home (161-364)
Neutral (1-50)Neutral (51-100)Neutral (101-200)Neutral (201-364)
Away (1-75)Away (76-135)Away (136-240)Away (241-364)

Bubble Breakdown:

Total Bids: 68

1-bid conferences: 23

Locks: 5

Bids Left: 40

Bubble: 58


–ACC–

Locks: 

duke
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

UNC (23 NET)

unc

If you’re a veteran around here you may remember me as being a bit harsh on Hubert Davis in the past, so I’ll admit I was pretty surprised when this Carolina group jumped out to 12-1 in noncon play, picking up wins over Kansas/UK/Ohio St along the way. That was an extremely strong start, but they’ve stubbed their toe a bit going just 4-3 so far in ACC play, with the recent trip to Cali seeing them lose to Stanford/Cal, hardly the UNC standard. What is up to that standard though is the 5-star diaper dandy Caleb Wilson, who is the undisputed leader of this team and clearly one of the best players in the country. His running mate in the front court Henri Veesar has been a stud as well, so while the recent stretch has been tough, I do think they have the talent behind those 2 to be dangerous. The guard play is a weakness, but per usual under Davis when they lose it’s because of their defense, and that’s simply going to be the bugaboo for this team as we continue on this year. All of that withstanding, they just went to Virginia and knocked off the Hoos, hard to ask for a better bounce back. With GA Tech and Syracuse on deck, we might be seeing the Tar Heels hit their stride.

Virginia (14)

Right off the jump, we have one of the surprises of the season, as year 1 under Ryan Odom is off to a raging success. After just 1 year in the dumps, due in large part to the sudden retirement of Tony Bennett, Odom transformed this roster and has the Hoos 8-3 in Q1-2 games as we approach February. Led by the European duo of De Ridder and Grunloh in the front court, this ragtag group of transfers have come together nicely and racked up road wins over Texas, NC State, Louisville and SMU, all featured on the watch. That group of wins has given them plenty of room for error, but given how well they’re playing I doubt we’ll be looking at their margin on the bubble and more about how high up the seed list they can rise. They are not just on the right track they’re on the fast track to locking up, which is crazy to say given they began the season 59th in Kenpom. They did hit a bit of a hiccup Saturday with the loss to UNC, but in terms of resumé they are still in a strong position, with winnable trips to Notre Dame and BC on deck. Certainly not time to panic.

Louisville (17)

louisville

This has been a tale of 2 seasons so far for Pat Kelsey and the Cardinals as they got out of the gates hot at 9-1, including a win over Kentucky. Then the Mikel Brown injury, which had a major impact on them offensively as he is their primary playmaker, setting up McKneely and Conwell with much cleaner looks from outside. He just returned for the first time on Saturday and they picked up a comfortable win behind his 20 points and 6 assists, exhibit A. With him, they look to be a no-doubt top-25 team primed for at minimum a 4-5 seed in the dance, possibly higher. It will be an interesting resumé to judge going forward now that he’s back. How much will the committee overlook that stretch without him? That’ll be a tough call, but if they continue to look strong with him I expect them to get a least a little forgiveness on those losses. For now, they have to navigate a very tough week starting with tonight’s trip to Cameron Indoor, with SMU at home around the corner. Massive opportunities, and with Brown now back it’s a chance to make a statement.

Clemson (31)

clemson

Brad Brownell is at it again as he had the Clemson Tigers off to a 6-0 start in the ACC after losing most of his roster from last year’s team that was a 5 seed. They are on track for that again, behind Utah Valley transfer Carter Welling and Middle Tennessee transfer Jestin Porter who joined forces with returning Tigers RJ Godfrey and Dillon Hunter to lead the way offensively. That side isn’t the strength though, as they are a top-15 team defensively and top-10 cleaning up the defensive glass. It’s not flashy, and many casual fans might not be able to name the leading scorers here, but they’re winning. The knock on them at this point is the lack of elite wins, and while the neutral site win over Georgia is aging well, SMU is the only other win over a team projected in the field right now, with a road win over Syracuse barely holding on to Q1 status. They need to pick up a couple more Q1 wins to really feel comfortable, but at this point in the season, and given the state of the bubble below them, they’re in a solid spot right now. They won’t get a major opportunity until mid-February, so for now they just need to hold serve and avoid disaster.

SMU (33)

SMU quietly has one of the most electric backcourts in the Country with Boopie Miller leading the way, but his partners in crime Jaron Pierre and BJ Edwards are both equally able to create for themselves and others. The result is a top-20 offense that shares the rock, with all 5 starters averaging double figures. Lookout for FR Jaden Toombs as well as he’s growing into a bigger and bigger role as the season progresses, so if they can just start getting some stops they could be a real problem in March. They have wins over A&M and UNC so far, and while that’s not the strongest, I’ll reiterate, that goes a lot further this year at this stage in the season. They are missing the elite Q1(A) win, but again I don’t think that’ll be a requirement this year. They do still have home meetings with Louisville and NC State to help beef up the Q1 record, not to mention the road chances that abound. Their only game this week is one of the biggest they have left, a trip to the YUM Center in Louisville. Must watch ACC ball on Saturday.

Teetering: 

Virginia Tech (52)

Mike Young appears to be working with his best team in what is now his 7th season at the helm in Blacksburg. They are a force inside with guys like Hansberry, Gurdak and now a healthy Tobi Lawal. Plus, they have Greek transfer Neo Avdalas who has wowed at times as a 6’9″ point forward, and 5’10” energizer bunny Ben Hammond running the show now at the point. It’s a fun team, with a ton of promise, but they’ve suffered 3 heartbreaking defeats in ACC play to kind of stymy their season a bit. They lost to Wake, Stanford and SMU all on last second shots, a brutal highlight of those 3 consecutive shots is circulating for the sickos who enjoy that kind of thing. Still, they are hanging their hat on a triple OT W over Virginia and recently knocked off Syracuse in their building for a 2nd Q1 W. This thing has momentum, and with Tyler Johnson set to return soon as another backcourt piece, they’re getting healthy at the right time as the schedule is about to ramp up. They have Duke at home this week, with trips to NC State and Clemson up after that. This next couple of weeks is going to teach us a lot about these Hokies.

Stanford (72)

If we know anything about Kyle Smith it’s that he has a knack for finding talented guys from seemingly out of nowhere, with his latest discovery being FR phenom Ebuka Okorie. The 3-star recruit from New Hampshire has exploded onto the scene, averaging 22 ppg and serving as the clear straw that stirs the drink for this team as a true FR. In their big wins this year he has balled out, including 36 in a win over UNC, 31 vs VA Tech and 28 vs Louisville. They recently lost 2nd leading scorer Chisom Okpara, so that will be something to monitor, although it didn’t stop them from taking down the Tar Heels. The other thing to keep in mind with this resumé is they have 2 horrific losses, one Q3 and one Q4. They were early in the season to UNLV/Seattle, but that will weigh them down a bit and will require some extra good wins to offset. That also helps explain the poor NET ranking, making now a great time to point out the committee does not use NET as a way of placing teams, it’s all about wins and losses. To that point, a great start as they’re 6-2 in Q1/2, and with one of the hottest scorers in the country they are a threat to take down anyone (except Duke…). After the home loss to Cal this week will be big to bounce back as they head to Florida to take on Miami and Florida St, 2 more Q1/2 chances.

NC State (27)

Will Wade came into Raleigh and completely rebuilt this roster with hopes of a quick turnaround back to relevancy in the ACC. Until this last week, that was looking pretty bleak, as prized transfer addition Darrion Williams had struggled and they were 0’fer in their Q1 chances. That all changed when they went to Clemson and picked up a massive road win, giving them their 1st Q1 victory and hopefully making up for their recent inexcusable loss to GA Tech. They are the perfect definition for teetering, as just over half of brackets on Bracket Matrix have them in the field, so they certainly have work to do to feel safe come Selection Sunday. The good news for these ACC teams is the conference has much more meat on the bone when it comes to the schedule and getting Q1/2 chances compared to last year. They will get at least 4, maybe up to 6 more cracks at Q1 wins, so that 1-5 record is going to look much different come March. Either way, the move to Fire Keatts and bring in Wade just a year after the Final 4 run is trending toward a success, albeit too early to call. This week’s trip to Wake represents one of those Q1 chances, after what should be a home win over Syracuse, but both of those teams are also looking for big wins.

Miami (FL) (37)

The Miami Hurricanes are quietly putting together a nice season after spending a few years in the cellar after that 2023 Final 4 run. Jai Lucas has come in and seemingly brought some stability and consistency already in year 1, and having them 16-4, with more wins that each of the past 2 seasons already, you have to say it’s a success already. I think most fans would immediately recognize the top guys on this roster, as Reneau (Indiana), Donaldson (Michigan) and Washington (N. Mexico) were all very relevant a season ago and have come together and played really well so far. Now all of that glazing can’t go without mentioning the recent skid that saw them go to Clemson and lose (no real shame there) but then drop an inexcusable one to Florida St at home. That put me on alert, but I was encouraged again to see them follow that up with a road win over Syracuse. No panic from me yet on these Canes, but the reality is while the computers are high on them they have just 1 Q1 win @ Wake. Overall they are 4-3 in Q1/2, but you’re going to hear me pound this drum all throughout the Watch. If you want to be in the Dance you have to pick up a big time win at some point. I’m circling home dates with UNC and Louisville later on as prime chances, but they’ll need to stay focused until those come along, starting this week with fellow bubble teams Stanford and Cal coming in. Gotta hold serve.

Cal (55)

Cal has become another one of the surprising ACC teams that is feisty and clearly better than they were in Mark Madsen’s first 2 years here. They are a team of transfers, so credit to Madsen for gelling this group together and getting them to play pretty good defense, even if they struggle to get rebounds to finish possessions. They are also a very good 3 point shooting team, led by Dai Dai Ames and John Camden. They aren’t going to wow anyone but they have 2 wins over UCLA and UNC that stack up pretty nicely compared to some of these other bubble teams that haven’t been able to beat good teams. Add in the road W over Stanford and they have 3 Q1 wins. Their main issue was a pitiful non-con schedule that also included a rough looking loss to K-State, making them 0-1 in Q2. The committee has consistently pushed teams down a bit with bad non-con schedules the last couple of years, so they really do need to pick up a few more strong wins to make up for that. They still get SMU and Clemson at home which are great opportunities, but other than that it’s going to have to come on the road. It’s a great story, but they dug themselves a hole with that weak non-con. This week they head to Florida to play Florida St and Miami, the latter a gigantic bubble matchup with a Q1 W on the line. Others watch top-15 battles between titans, we go to the slums for bubble mania between Cal and Miami.

Outside Looking In:

Wake Forest (67)

Wake

Listen I know perfectly well this is a long shot but this is a classic example of what I want to do here, and that’s lay out every possible scenario. I can’t help but look at the way this Wake Forest team has played in Q1 games, combined with what they still have on the schedule, and not see the path. They have narrow losses to Michigan, Texas Tech, Miami and UNC. So while that resumé is ugly right now (3-9 Q1/2) they still get to host NC State, Louisville and Clemson. They likely need to win all 3 of those games, plus taking care of business in games they should win, but that path to getting to 3 or 4 Q1 wins and having a fighting chance is still there. As dark and perilous as it may be, if you’re a Demon Deacon fan out there now is the time to strap up because every game from this point forward is going to be critical. It starts this week with a trip to Pitt and then one of those premier chances with NC State coming to Winston-Salem. A 2-0 week and we’re cooking something up here with the Demon Deacons.


–Big Ten–

Locks:

nebraska
Proj. 1
michigan
Proj. 2

On the Right Track:

Michigan St (9) 

sparty

Tom Izzo continues to do his thing in East Lansing as he has crafted yet another elite defensive team that is right on the edge of locking in their tournament spot in January. As a true college hoops fan, still getting to watch him do his thing is a joy, especially seeing a program that’s still recruiting and developing guys like Jaxon Kohler, Coen Carr and Jeremy Fears into really good Big 10 basketball players. I mean, Fears is one of the best PG’s in the country and collectively they’re #1 defensively and top-10 on the offensive glass. They don’t have a special offensive talent like they did last year with Jase Richardson, but that hasn’t stopped them from racking up 5 Q1 victories so far. The marquee game of the season is around the corner as well as they host in-state rival Michigan this Friday night. That’s the huge opportunity to just put the stamp on Sparty as a legit contender this year and an obvious top 2 or 3 seed in March. The only knock when stacked up against the upper echelon of teams is they don’t have that signature Q1(A) win, so a win over Michigan is just what they need to firmly enter that 1-2 seed conversation. All in all, we likely won’t be discussing them for long on the Watch, but had to get my Izzo thoughts in at least once.

 Illinois (6)

illinois

The story of 2025-26 Illinois has to begin with the FR phenom Keaton Wagler, who just became a household name with his record breaking 46 piece he dropped on Purdue. That gave the Illini their signature win, putting them firmly in the conversation in the Big Ten and should put them on the radar Nationally as well, as they have now ripped off 9 in a row with Wagler playing at a high level the entire way. Now, he isn’t averaging 40 a game by any means, but he’s the 12th most efficient player in the entire country as a true FR. Quite the story, and completely out of nowhere for a team that came into the season being talked about for all of their international talent. Turns out the 3-star kid from Kansas was going to steal the show, and now the Illini are up to 6 Q1 wins, with that road win vs Purdue the feather in their cap. They are well on their way to locking up, but with just 17 wins we have to see a few more before we can rule out a complete collapse. Another fun one is on deck this week as they head to undefeated Nebraska after a home tilt with Washington. 2 more wins and we can likely throw away the key.

Purdue (10)

purdue-4

The Boilers have hit a bit of snag of late after starting the year as the pre-season #1 team and getting off to a 17-1 start. That clearly wasn’t an accurate ranking, but the return of Braden Smith and Trey Kaufmann-Renn, plus some reinforcements, have clearly made them better than a year ago. They have already picked up 6 Q1 wins, including elite wins over Texas Tech, Alabama and Wisconsin all away from home. To be clear, I’m writing this shortly after the loss to Illinois that gave them back-to-back losses and their 2nd loss to a top-10 team at home. So, I’m here to say, while it may seem like the dreams are vanishing into the all too familiar void, it’s not panic time for folks in West Lafayette just yet. The Boilers are still sporting a strong resumé that has them in the 2-3 seed range in late January. A long way to go, with more measuring stick chances against some Big Ten powers yet ahead. They still get Michigan and Michigan St at home with a trip to Nebraska in there. It may sound perilous, but I think this veteran group will be hungry to prove they belong in the upper echelon of the sport. This week it’s a trip to Bloomington that is always tough and then a terrible Maryland team. Have to bounce back and get 2 big wins, which will help get them close to locking up as well.

Iowa (21)

These are not your father’s Iowa Hawkeyes, as gone are the days of the high tempo, electric offense that couldn’t stop a nose bleed teams we saw during Fran McCafferey’s reign in Iowa City. HC Ben McCollum has completely transformed the roster, along with the play style, as this Iowa group led by Bennett Stirtz wants to grind the tempo to a crawl and out execute you in the half court. So far, it has yielded fairly good results, but the new look Hawkeyes are a tricky resumé to place right now because they truly don’t have any elite wins. Sure they went to Bloomington and beat Indiana for a Q1 W, but they haven’t beaten a team inside the top-35. Conversely, 4 of their 5 losses are to top-10 Kenpom teams and the NET/Kenpom have them as a top-25 team. They appear to either be a prime candidate to knock off a big boy and go flying up the seed list or just a solid team that isn’t quite good enough to contend with those guys. The answer to that question will be the determining factor into whether we see a 6 or 7 seed Iowa or if we’re talking about these Hawkeyes all the way up to Selection Sunday. This next week is all about taking care of business, as they host USC and then go to a down Oregon, 2 Q2 games that you really need in order to avoid true bubble territory.

Teetering: 

Wisconsin (41)

wisconsin

This year’s Badgers got off to a clunky start at 7-4 by mid-December, but then they ripped off a 7-1 stretch including what has to be the best win of any team on the Watch as they went to Ann Arbor and beat Michigan. The hype train had the brakes slammed on it yesterday though as they lost a home game to USC, a Q2 loss that makes everyone take breath. We’ll assume that was just a minor bump in the road, but it certainly go my attention and cooled my tone for this blurb. The duo of John Blackwell and Nick Boyd are still leading the way for a new look Wisconsin team that is filling it up offensively but struggling to get stops. Not quite the recipe we’ve been used to with a Greg Gard led team but they’re 6-6 in Q1/2 which has them firmly in the 8-9 seed range. Their issue is mainly the 1-5 Q1 record, but again when that 1 is a road win over #2 ranked Michigan you certainly feel confident. I still think they’ll need to add another quality win or 2 to truly feel safe, and they’ll have prime chances with Michigan St and Iowa both coming to the Kohl Center in February. Of course they’ll have plenty of road chances as well, but however it comes I can guarantee you it will be an uneasy feeling without that Q1 win total getting to 3 or 4 by Selection Sunday. This week they need to bounce back, with home matchups with Minnesota and Ohio St just what the doctor ordered.

USC (51)

The Muss Buss seemed like it was headed off the edge of a cliff until yesterday when they went into Madison and picked up their best win of the season over the Badgers. Up to that point they had lost 4 out of 6 with the 2 wins not carrying much weight as they dropped from firmly in to right square on the bubble. That win gives them some breathing room as it gives them their 1st Q1 win to go with 6 in Q2. Right now they are just a 2 headed monster with Chad Baker-Mazara and Ezra Ausar having to take the reigns after Rodney Rice went down for the season in November. They did recently get FR Alijah Arenas into the lineup though and he started against Wisconsin, so there could be some juice now with his addition. I was at the door ready to fully exit the Muss Buss this year and then they go and do what they did yesterday. Now I must sit back down and see what might be coming around the corner as they go to Iowa on Tuesday with a chance to make another statement. A loss there won’t expire all hope, they’ll just need to bounce back and beat Rutgers to hold serve. I was prepared to say it’s getting close to do or die time, but right now they can kind of stand pat a little because at 7-5 in Q1/2 they should be considered solidly in, albeit close.

UCLA (42)

ucla

The Bruins are quietly heating up here as of late, winners of 4 of their last 5, including the signature win vs Purdue this past week which got them onto the right side of things. The resumé itself isn’t that strong overall, just 4-6 in Q1/2, but that elite win elevates them above a lot of these bubble teams that are sitting on maybe 1 or 2 wins even in the top-50. It feels like after some friction early on, Mick Cronin has finally gotten this group to gel a bit, with Donovan Dent starting to find his way offensively. They still aren’t the usual defensive stalwarts we see under Cronin which I’m sure is driving him crazy, among a host of other things we continue to hear about. Nevertheless, these Bruins are looking like they’ve turned a corner, and with 3 home games in a row after their trip to a down Oregon this week, I’d be shocked if we don’t see them rip off 4 more in a row and really start hitting their stride. The schedule is going to toughen up though after that, and given the just 1 strong win we’re going to need to see them knock off another big boy to really feel comfortable by Selection Sunday. Until then though they just have to avoid disaster and win the games they’re supposed to.

Ohio St (36) 

buckeyes

Ohio St right now is one of those rare teams where it’s pretty cut and dry who they are. A solid team that just hasn’t had the goods to beat great teams this year. They have a big 3 that lead the way for them as Bruce Thornton, John Mobley and Devin Royal have to be great for them to have a chance, especially since they can’t get stops. Their best win to date is a road win over Northwestern that is barely qualifying as a Q1 win, with Q2 wins vs UCLA and on a neutral site vs WVU being right behind. That’s not a strong group of wins, which is why they find themselves seesawing from Last 4 In and First 4 Out. Not a comfortable place to be in, but certainly encouraging to be at least in the mix considering they’ve missed the dance entirely the last 3 seasons. They have at least 6 more Q-1 chances, but you better believe if they’re just 1-11 or even 2-10 in Q1 they will be NIT bound. They are one of those teams that have to be big game hunting, as they need that signature win or 2 to bring to the table on Selection Sunday. Unfortunately, it’ll have to be on the road unless they plan to knock off Michigan or Purdue at home, which is possible but I like their odds at Wisconsin or Iowa for example. Either way, what needs done is clear, and we’ll be here to see if they can get it done.

Outside Looking In:

Indiana (35)

indiana

The Hoosiers in year 1 under Darian DeVries are an even more extreme version of the Buckeyes as they just haven’t been able to actually beat a good team. They are well thought of by the computers, but their best win right now is a home W over Washington which qualifies as their only Q2 win to go with an 0-6 Q1 record. While I give credit to Coach DeVries bringing in guys like Wilkerson and Conerway to pair with his son Tucker, they simply haven’t gotten it done when it matters most. They have fully embodied the “live by the 3 die by the 3” mantra, all while struggling on D against top competition. They essentially have to get hot from outside to even have a chance against high level teams. The good news is they still have opportunities ahead, including a massive one this week with Purdue coming in. They’ll hope the magic of the rivalry will inspire some hot shooting as a W over Purdue would be just the win they need to catapult them into more serious consideration. As of now, they’re not particularly close, but in a year with a weak bubble it only takes a couple big wins to flip this thing around.


–Big 12–

Locks: 

arizona
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

Iowa St (7)

iowast

After a brief hiccup the Cyclones have steadied the ship after a quick 2 game skid that saw them lose in blowout fashion in Allen Fieldhouse and then get stunned by .500 Cincinnati. The latter was the eye opening one, especially for a team that had prognosticators discussing if they were among the best in the sport in the weeks prior. I don’t think many jumped off them, but those considering it surely feel better after watching them thump UCF and Oklahoma St this past week. It appears maybe they got a bit big for their britches and a couple of poundings snapped them back into focus. That’s my takeaway at least, and for a veteran group with a HC and names we all know, that kind of resting on your laurels stretch in January is not uncommon. This resumé is about as good as it gets, as they hover on the 2/3 line with a couple others as it could go either way. They are among the next in line to be locked, and if they go another week of pummeling teams they should (Colorado/Kansas St), then we should feel confident at 20-2 with a 10-2 Q1/2 record they can join the illustrious group of locked in teams. Or we’ll find out that little blip was a bigger red flag than I gave it credit for.

Houston (11)

houston

Not so fast my friends! Just as the whole country was starting to buy back in on the #2 pre-season ranked Houston Cougars they went to Texas Tech and dropped a tough one. Now, I don’t think by any means that made them a bubble team, but it kept me from locking them up as they only have just 4 Q1 wins with only 1 of the Q1(A) variety. That slid them down to the 3 line by my estimation, as it’s incredibly competitive for the top 2 seeds right now. I still think that by Kelvin Sampson’s standards they have a ways to go, but it also might be true with these FR, they might just not have it in them to be as suffocating on D as we’re used to. The good news is they’re balancing that regression with some explosiveness offensively, mostly due to the FR phenom Kingston Flemings who had 42 points in the loss. He is a hooper and with a fearless guard like him, if they can just click on defense a little better they will become a scary opponent once again. Their bounce back spot is a trip to Ft. Worth to take on a desperate TCU team, but if I know Coach Sampson (not personally of course) then they’ll be locked in defensively trying to make up for allowing 90 points to the Red Raiders. I would not want to be TCU facing Houston in this spot. We’ll see if my instincts are on point, but regardless of how they do it, if they go 2-0 this week this will be the only time we discuss Houston here on the Watch.

Texas Tech (18)

tx tech

Heard ya loud and clear Red Raiders. This Texas Tech team just welcomed Houston to Lubbock and enacted their revenge as they knocked off the Cougars after falling at their place a few weeks back. That gives Tech their 3rd win over top-12 NET teams (Duke/BYU the other 2). That trio of wins is as good as it gets in the country, and their 4 losses are all of elite variety as well. They are 13-0 outside of Q1(A), as squeaky clean as a resumé can get. The only thing working against them is there are so many teams ahead of them with 0-2 losses that they’re buried a bit down the seed line in the 3-4 range. It’s tough sledding up there at the top of the seed list, but they’re clearly running on all cylinders as the sharpshooters are hitting with regularity and opening things up for big man JT Toppin inside. Quite the recipe for success, and it’s powering them on this 9-1 stretch that has seen them pick up all of those elite wins. I’m not sure if anyone is talking about them among the upper echelon of the sport, but the way they’ve been playing it would be a disservice not to be. They have a bit of a break and play just once this week @ UCF. A loss there would make me eat crow, but nevertheless I’m going to ride the wave they’re taking me on.

BYU (12)

byu

BYU has become quite the force since joining the Big 12 and now in year 2 under Kevin Young they have what is likely their best team in school history. They are of course led by AJ Dybantsa who we all know at this point, but the backcourt duo of Richie Saunders and Rob Wright cannot be overlooked. All 3 average between 17 and 22 ppg, giving them probably the strongest trio in the country offensively. Having that top end talent certainly makes them a player, but we’ve already seen how it can be a bit of a hindrance to be so reliant on just a few guys. In the recent loss to Texas Tech they got just 12 points from the ancillary guys, not going to cut it. That speaks to the weakness of their overall resumé as well as they have 4 Q1 wins but none of them are against top-30 opponents as they’re 0-2 in those spots. Are they good enough to truly contend with and beat the big boys? We’re going to find out soon enough, and while that may not be required for them to get locked up eventually, it will probably keep them on the Watch a bit longer if they can’t pick up those kind of wins. They host Arizona/Kansas this week and then go to Houston next week. Play time is over, time to see how these Cougars truly stack up.

Kansas (15)

kansas

Is Darryn Peterson healthy and playing? That’s the defining question for the Jayhawks’ season so far, and while it hasn’t been a total disaster when he’s not in there, the mysterious nature of his lineup inclusion/absence has made this essentially the only thing people are talking about. That and the fact he could be the #1 pick in the draft and is as fun a watch as the sport has to offer. The relevant news for the tournament and seeding is that they’ve acquitted themselves well in his abcense, going 6-2 in those games including the Q1 win over Tennessee. With him, it looks like they could be one of the more dangerous teams in the tourney, with the size and athleticism to be lock down defensively. The ancillary guys have also gotten better around Peterson, so if he can get healthy again I would not want to see the Jayhawks in March. Overall they are in solid shape, with 3 Q1(A) wins and a 10-5 Q1/2 record. It also sounds like Bill Self believes there’s a chance Peterson is back for their lone test this next week, a massive one @ BYU. A huge litmus test if he’s fully healthy, and must watch TV with the presumptive top-2 picks going head-to-head.

UCF (38)

ucf

UCF has made just 1 NCAA tourney appearance over the last 21 seasons, and it’s been 7 years since that run with Tacko Fall and the boys got to the 2nd round. So it’s with that in mind that we discuss a team rarely on the Bubble Watch over the last few years. Johnny Dawkins is still running the show and he has a guard duo in Riley Kugel and Themus Fulks, the latter being one of the best PGs in the Country that seemingly nobody would know about. Those two running the show have given the Knights enough juice to knock off Kansas at home and A&M on the road. That gives them 2 Q1 wins in a year where that can separate you a bit from the true bubble cut line at this stage. Overall they have no bad losses, so they’ll have their target set on some of the top contenders in this conference as they’ll need to pick up a couple more big wins to really feel comfortable. That can all start this week as they host Texas Tech after what needs to be a home win over Arizona St. A 2-0 week would really create some separation, but a 1-1 or even worse 0-2, week would make them feel a lot more bubbly.

Teetering: N/A

Outside Looking In:

TCU (44)

The Horned Frogs opened this season with a loss to 223rd ranked New Orleans, suffice to say it’s surprising to find them in a position to be in the bubble conversation. Jamie Dixon has built this roster with a blend of returning SO’s from last year’s recruiting class and a group of transfers, with JUCO transfer Xavier Edmonds the biggest surprise story of them all. He, along with David Punch, are leading the way on offense, and that strength inside has allowed them to rack up impressive wins over Florida/Wisconsin and a sweep of Baylor. That is good for 3 Q1 wins, helping to make up for the aforementioned bad loss along with the ND loss at home that is an additional black stain. They have a bit of the Stanford condition going on as they have horrific losses but solid group of wins that is keeping them in the mix. The committee has historically been willing to overlook a couple bad losses, so long as they were early enough in the season and you have the goods in Q1 to make up for it. I don’t think they’re quite there yet but it’s getting closer. The good news, they host Houston this week which is a great opportunity to cement themselves as for real. A loss will keep them on the wrong side of the bubble, and a tricky trip to Colorado follows that one so a massive swing week as 2-0 and 0-2 look far different.

West Virginia (65)

This West Virginia group has come out the woodwork recently as they’ve gone on a 4-2 spurt that included a home win over Kansas. The big story of the off-season was new HC Ross Hodge landing Trey Eaglestaff from North Dakota. It has been kind of forgotten about as a story early in the season though, as he struggled to adjust, but as of late he’s been red hot shooting almost 48% from 3 in Big 12 play. He’s been the catalyst, and that kind of win over the Jayhawks is good enough to get you on the radar this year. while the Q1/2 record is a measly 2-7, we’re here to lay out the path. They have at least 5 more Q1 chances with several more in Q2, so the opportunity to get hot and vastly improve their position is clearly there. This week they just need to take care of business as they host K-State and then Baylor. Those 2 wins would only add 1 Q2 win, but every win is going to be huge going forward so they absolutely have to go 2-0 this week to stay in the conversation. It’s an uphill battle, but the way they’ve been playing I couldn’t leave them off the Watch.

Oklahoma St (73)

This is one where I feel obligated to include the Pokes but in reality I feel their most recent 2-5 stretch since Big 12 play got going is more reflective of who they are. They got out to a 12-1 start, including a win over Texas A&M that has aged well, but at the time they weren’t playing well and even with that they still have 0 Q1 wins after a rather pathetic non-con SOS. In theory yes they very much have a path, and credit can go to Steve Lutz in year 2 to at least have gotten them up off the mat and into this position. They also very well could prove me wrong and beat some of the top contenders in the Big 12 down the stretch, but they’re going to have to grab at least 3 maybe 4 high quality wins to feel comfortable with the SOS numbers they have. The computers have them pretty accurately pegged in my book, as they feel perfectly average. Capable of beating bad teams and then they get smoked by the top dogs. That’s the beauty of the Watch though, as we’re going to track them regardless of what the odds may say, because certainly in this bubble environment if they were to knock off BYU next week in Stillwater they’d be right in the mix and a giant egg would be on my face.

Baylor (59)

Baylor has been a mess lately, going just 1-6 in Big 12 play, so if you’re shocked to even see them on here I wouldn’t blame you. Here’s what I know though, this team has talent and Scott Drew can coach. Those things combined with a resumé that has 4 Q1/2 wins and strong SOS numbers the season is certainly salvageable. Do I have much confidence that it will happen? Not really, especially with how dreadful they have been defensively. I mean they lost back-to-back home games to Texas Tech and TCU giving up over 90 each game. Hardly a confidence booster. It essentially comes down to this week as they go to Cincy and W. Virginia. Lose both of those and we are done with this year’s Baylor Bears, which could mean the first missed tourney for Drew since 2018. However, if they can bounce back and pick up 2 Q1 wins all of a sudden they’re back in this thing. It’s a back against the wall, season on the line type of week where we’re going to find out if he has truly lost the locker room or not. Have these guys just moved on to next year? Planning their move to the portal or the NBA? Or is it possible they have an ounce of pride and can come together to resurrect this thing?


–Big East–

Locks:

uconn
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

St. John’s (25)

st john's

It hasn’t always been pretty but Rick Pitino seems to have gotten this overhauled roster playing much closer to his standard as they’ve ripped off 6 in a row since the ugly loss to Providence in the Garden. He has now started 9 different guys so far this year, with the latest addition of Dillon Mitchell seeming to have a huge positive impact as he’s been dominant of late. The main idea here is Pitino brought in a ton of talent via the portal, but struggled early to find the right pieces that would gel together the best. While he hasn’t been shy about his desire to build his roster only through the portal, we’ve seen the struggles that can bring trying to bring 10 random kids to a place and fit them together. The resumé overall isn’t super strong, with a road win over 34th ranked Nova the best win, but this year 3-4 in Q1 and 7-4 overall Q1/2 is good enough to have them in the 6/7 range and pretty safely in. Still, there is work to be done as you really don’t want to enter Selection Sunday with this little to bring to the table as far as high quality wins. This week they host Butler and go to DePaul, 2 Q2 games you simply need to have to keep this thing rolling. Then UConn comes to town, one the whole college hoops world has circled.

Villanova (34)

At this point we can confidently say Nova is the surprise of the season in the Big East, as the roster for Kevin Willard in year 1 didn’t exactly jump off the page, but they’re clearly the 3rd best team in the Big East this year. They’re a balanced team with 6 guys averaging double figures so it’s not like Willard just leaned on one big portal grab, it’s a team full of guys who are buying what he is selling and playing together. They just took UConn to OT, falling on the road, but that shows you what stuff they’re made of being able to take the clear top dog in this conference to the brink. Their main issue, which is the issue of many bubble teams right now is the lack of a top tier win, as the best one is on a neutral court vs Wisconsin. This is a year where 1 truly great win could be a separator, so for them it’s going to be about big game hunting, with UConn coming to PA and then a trip to St. John’s being the marquee chances. If they don’t get either of those, I would imagine this is going to be close as we come down the stretch. They’ll play just one time until we meet again and that’s at home vs Providence, simply a must win as they can’t afford to add an ugly Q3 loss to what is already a paltry 4-5 Q1/2 record.

Teetering:

Seton Hall (56)

The Pirates are in total free fall right now as they’ve lost 4 Big East games in a row, with the latest loss to DePaul the real red flag that this thing may be off the rails. For the first 16 games it looked like Shaheen Holloway had put together a grind it out team that could be a nightmare in March. At this point though it looks like their struggles offensively are being exposed, especially after losses to Butler and DePaul. They are still a top-10 defensive team in the Country, there’s just not enough punch on the other end for them to win consistently. The good news for them is they get Xavier and Marquette at home this week, 2 games they absolutely have to have if they want to stay out of the danger zone. They have plenty of road opportunities to pick up Q1 wins down the stretch, and they’ll certainly need to improve their pedestrian 1-2 record in that category. I would have them right on the edge right now, either Last 4 In or First 4 out, so this week is absolutely critical for them. We’ll see if they can turn this ship around.

Outside Looking In:

Creighton (61)

creighton

This Creighton group has been a bit of a thud this year, as they came into the season top-25 and with some legitimate hope for another great year under McDermott. They started out just 5-5, losing to essentially every good team they played, while beating up on low major opponents. Then McDermott starting shuffling things around, mainly moving Owen Freeman to the bench for stretch big Traudt and inserting Austin Swartz into the starting lineup. Since then things have clicked, at least offensively, with Swartz leading them in scoring in Big East play at 17 ppg, including the game winner the other night vs Xavier. The 7-3 record since that rough start is why they’re still alive and on the Watch, because they are pretty far out of it at just 3-8 in Q1/2, but with a road win over top-25 Villanova as the feather in their cap right now, the path is still there. They host UConn this week after a trip to Marquette. Have to beat this year’s Golden Eagles, which would set them up for a season altering win if they can knock off the Huskies. I’m not predicting it, but if they do in fact go 2-0 this week they would be right near the cut line, with more opportunities to come. The odds are low, but if it does happen I at least want to be along for the ride from the beginning.

Butler (50)

Right now Butler is a bit of a long shot but the win last week @ Seton Hall gave them a 2nd Q1 win to add to the increasingly impressive win over Virginia in non-con play. As someone from Indiana who lived through the Brad Stevens era as I fell in love with college hoops, I have some bias here when it comes to rooting for Butler to get back in the mix. Thad has done a decent job here, especially considering the resources he has to work with, as this group has a mix of transfers and rising recruits Thad is developing. Gonzaga transfer Michael Ajayi is leading the way along with Maryland transfer Jamie Kaiser, but the guys like Bizjack, Haywood and Robinson are all Matta recruits making an impact. I’m not trying to sell this Butler team as a contender to make a deep run, but I do think they have a real shot to work themselves onto the right side of the bubble. This 3 game win streak has been huge, but they need to strike on their opportunities the rest of the way, especially at home as they host UConn/Creighton/Seton Hall still. They won’t have many Q1 chances, but if they can get to 3 or 4 Q1 wins and flip that Q2 record above .500, they’ll be right in the mix. That’s the path, albeit windy and full of peril, it still exists, and I will cling to it til there’s absolutely no way through.


–SEC–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track:

Arkansas (20)

Stop me if you’ve heard this before. John Calipari is up at the top of the SEC with a team led by a couple of special FR. Yeah, maybe now it’s being done in red instead of blue, but it’s the same old story as Cal continues to recruit at an elite level and develop young kids into great college players. It goes beyond the special FR Acuff and Thomas, as the returning duo of Knox and Richmond were 2 of Cal’s big gets last year in year 1 in Fayetteville. So, whatever you may think of him, you have to admit he’s pretty good at this. These young Razorbacks are scoring at an elite level, and now have surged up to as high as a 4 seed in projections behind 4 Q1 wins, including the 2 elite wins over Vandy and Texas Tech. They obviously have a ways to go defensively, but with the special talents they have in the backcourt they have enough to firepower to win the SEC this year as it’s wide open at the top. They have a big trap game with a stop in Norman this week that is the precursor to a gigantic one as Cal’s old team Kentucky comes to town. Can’t get caught napping in the SEC, so ideally we’re back here with Arkansas 17-5 and on the verge of locking. But something tells me at least one of these games this week is going to be testy.

Vanderbilt (13)

For 16 games Mark Byington and the Commodores were right there with Nebraska as the lead story in college basketball, then they dropped 3 games in a row. The question for a long time was if Vandy was for real, or if that 14, 15, then 16-0 start was just a mirage? Well, the losses to Texas, Florida and then Arkansas in blowout fashion certainly had critics patting themselves on the back for calling out the fraudulent nature of the Dores. Saturday they appeared to take out some frustration as they ended that 3 game slide with a 32 point drubbing of Mississippi St. The real story in my book was the rise of 3 star Sophomore PG Tyler Tanner who has come out of nowhere to be on of the best PGs in the country. Whether or not Vandy is the best team in the SEC is yet to be determined, but they are still in a strong position resumé wise with 4 Q1 wins and a 10-3 total record in Q1/2. They will hope the bounce back win was enough to wash the stink off, as they host a red hot Kentucky team this week and then go to a desperate Ole Miss team. Big week to prove that was just a minor hiccup and not a sign of things to come in Nashville.

Alabama (22)

The Tide have been making headlines for all the wrong reasons this year, but I’m just gonna focus on the ball and not the fact they added a G-league player midseason. Whether or not you agree, the need for Charles Bediako has been obvious all season as the Tide have been their usual selves offensively but inside they have really struggled to rebound and defend. It’s hard to know what is going to happen with the committee if Bediako plays all year, but considering they are now 0-1 with him playing I don’t think it’s going to make a major impact in terms of results on the floor. They have essentially been the same team year after year with Nate Oats running the show, as they play lightning fast, launching the first open 3 they generate and then generally struggle to get stops. That’s them again this year, and that lack of defensive might has been the reason they have lost 5 Q1 games. All of that said, comparatively they have a solid resumé, as they’re 8-6 in Q1/2, they just are down near the 4/5 seed line at this stage. They have another massive test Saturday as they head to Florida, but first they have to take care of a pesky Mizzou team at home.

Florida (16)

florida

The defending champs are going through some big time struggles this year, and while that may be a bit hyperbolic for a team around a 5 seed right now, relative to expectations I think it’s fair. They came into the season repping one of the strongest front courts in the Country, with guys like Chinyelu/Condon/Haugh all returning. The question was how they were going to replace their star guards that graduated, and HC Todd Golden went to the portal and landed what everyone thought were 2 great replacements in Boogie Fland and Xaivian Lee. Those 2 guys have struggled mightily to knock down shots, with the results being the Gators ranking 348th in 3 point % after being 82nd last year. That led to just a 5-4 start, but they then went 9-1 over the next 10 as they seemed to turn the corner. Then came Saturday when they lost at home to Auburn. Can you make any sense of this team? I certainly can’t seem to, but at the end of the day we’re worried about teams making and missing the dance, and right now they’ve done enough to be comfortably in. They need to bounce back from that surprising loss though, and while a trip to lowly S. Carolina won’t do much for the resumé it can be a great confidence boost to drop the hammer on a team. Then they host Bama in a big test for both. 2 wins and we’ll be putting some of that doubt to rest.

Tennessee (24)

vols

The Vols are all over the place this year, as one night they look pedestrian and the next they go to Tuscaloosa and beat Alabama. Much of it is likely due to the roster turnover and the difficulty of gelling so many new guys that comes with that. The other obstacle has been they really only have 2 consistent guys offensively in Gillespie and the FR Ament. Outside of those 2 scoring has been a challenge, and since they haven’t been the kind of stifling defense that we’ve seen under Barnes they’ve struggled when those 2 aren’t rolling. Big picture that road win over Bama was massive in giving them some breathing room between them and the real bubble, as they now have 3 Q1 wins and 2 in the Q1(A) category (Houston/Bama). That collection of wins is strong enough now, but they will need to keep adding in order to feel totally comfortable, and they’ll have plenty of chances to do so in the SEC. This week it starts with a trip to Georgia and then they host Auburn. 2 more Q1 chances and a week in general that could shed some light on who exactly these Vols are. Or we may just see the roller coaster continue if they split.

Kentucky (28)

kentucky

The night of Wednesday January 7th was as a low a point for Kentucky basketball as we’ve seen in a long time as they dropped a home game vs Mizzou to drop to 9-6. Credit to Mark Pope, because BBN was shining up the pitch forks and he has gotten this team to respond by winning 5 straight games to get this train back on the tracks. Pope has had to navigate injuries and poor play, exemplified by the fact he’s started 11 different guys this year. Yes, you read that right, 11 different starters as everyone who has played and contributed besides Jasper Johnson has started at least once. I have no idea where he will settle, but the core of Aberdeen, Oweh and Moreno are clearly the leaders and whatever switch was flipped on that dark night seems to have made a big impact. This run has seen them improve from 2-6 in Q1/2 to 5-6, putting big separation between them and the teams near the cut line. Now, this is about to be the toughest week on the schedule for UK as they go to Vandy and Arkansas. So I’m telling you now I won’t be hitting the panic button if they drop 2 in a row, but if they do happen to steal one of those I will really start to buy them as a rising contender. A very interesting week to see how far this group really has come.

Auburn (29)

auburn

It has been a rocky road to get here but War Eagle is being cried with pride again as the group is starting to click and rack up big time wins in a hurry. They started the season just 9-6, but it was against a difficult schedule, with a rebuilt roster and bye the way they changed HC’s right before the season started as son Steven took over for his dad as Bruce Pearl retired. Quite a way to enter the season, and as rough as it looked at times they have seemingly turned a corner as they’ve won 4 of their last 5 games, including a home win over Arkansas and the most recent statement win @ Florida. They are clearly starting to gel and learn how to play together, and it certainly helps to have a guy like Keyshawn Hall scoring over 20 points a night. Overall they are now up to 4 Q1 wins, and while the 5-7 Q1/2 record doesn’t seem strong having 2 Q1(A) wins over Florida and St. John’s is a gigantic separator from the actual bubble cut line. They are hovering somewhere around the 7-8 seed line and barring some sort of reversal in quality of play look to be a solid bet to be in the tournament and a dangerous team with the firepower they have. This week they host Texas and then head to Tennessee, a chance to pick up at least one if not two Q1/2 victories, but it won’t come easy.

Teetering:

Texas A&M (40)

a&m

Bucky ball is alive and well in College Station, but I bet even he would’ve been skeptical of the idea they could be leading the SEC outright at almost the halfway point in conference play. They play small, fast and launch 3’s. That’s Bucky ball baby. They may not have the top end names we would expect to see, but credit to McMillan for finding guys to fit his style and getting them to gel and play this well. Some may doubt them the way they doubted Vandy, but how can you really say that at this point when they’re sitting at 6-1 in the SEC? You could criticize the schedule, but they’ve beaten Auburn and Texas on the road, nothing to scoff at. It really doesn’t seem like there’s a dominate team in the league, so at this point it seems they have as good a chance as anyone to win it. So far the resumé doesn’t have that strong signature win at the top, but they do technically have 2 Q1(A) wins despite being just 5-4 overall in Q1/2. The SOS numbers are the issue, but I don’t see long term that being too much of a hindrance with 11 more SEC games to go. They only play once this week and it’s a trip to Georgia, so we may have a bit of different tone next week if that goes south. If they win however I think it’ll really be time for people to start paying attention to the Aggies.

Georgia (32)

Mike White has been slowly turning things around here and this looks to be his best team yet, with a chance to get to back-to-back tourney’s for the first time since ’01-’02, also the last time they won a game in March. Now, on the surface you would look at Georgia and see a 16-4 SEC team and likely assume they are pretty comfortably in the field at this stage. That’s not what I’m seeing, as the Dawgs played a very weak non-con, losing their lone Q1 game vs Clemson. The have picked up 3 Q1 wins in SEC play, so that has gotten them in, but they also picked up a Q3 loss to Ole Miss and have yet to win a Q1(A) game. I’m looking at this next week as a prove it week for UGA as they have back-to-back home games with Tennessee and A&M. Those are two teams capable of going into Athens and winning, so you would like to see a legit team hold on to home court against solid but not elite teams. This is especially true since they just lost to Texas by 20, a game in which they led by 8 at half, losing the 2nd half 57-30. Brutal, and a result that can not just expose cracks but fully bust apart foundation. All about how you respond this time of year.

Missouri (68)

Unlike many other teams on the Watch Mizzou doesn’t have much issue with taking on the big boys and coming away with a dub. It just so happens they also are capable of losing to just about anybody as well. That leaves them in the Stanford/TCU category where they play to the level of their competition and lose to teams like Notre Dame and LSU but also have wins over Florida/Kentucky/Auburn. In number form, that gives them a better Q1 record 3-3 than Q2 record 1-3. There’s also the issue that the played a horrifically bas non-con schedule that gave them virtually 0 opportunities to show anything. That kind of scheduling usually gets hammered by the committee, so while I love that every game they play is seemingly close, they are going to have to come out on top with more regularity if they want to flip to the right side of the bubble. They have a tough trip to Tuscaloosa to face Bama off a loss next, and then they host Mississippi St. Has to be at worst a 1-1 week to stay firmly in the mix. Although knowing these Missouri Tigers we’re just as likely to see that loss be @ Bama as vs Mississippi St. That pretty much sums up who they are, or at least who they have been so far.

Texas (39)

texas

Year 1 under Sean Miller has been a topsy turvy ride as he has had to try and find the right combo of these transfers to get the job done. They have become a really good offensive unit, behind the 7 foot Lithuanian Vokietaitis as well as Dailyn Swain they have risen to just outside the top-10 in offensive efficiency. Their issues have been on the other end of the floor, which has been mired by inconsistency and led to their bad losses to Mississippi St and Arizona St. The good news for them is they’ve gotten rolling a bit lately, picking up wins over Bama and Vandy to add to the non-con win over NC State. The resumé is taking shape, but there’s still work to be done as they are somewhere around the First 4 Out as of the latest Bracket Matrix update. This week offers up a Q1 and Q2 road chance as they head to Auburn and then Oklahoma. I would think they at least need to beat the Sooners to stay at or near the cut line, as an 0-2 week would drop them to just 4-9 Q1/2. Life on the bubble is not easy, and a week like this in the SEC is a fantastic example of that.

Outside Looking In:

LSU (46)

There hasn’t been much success for Matt McMahon here in Baton Rouge, as we’re now in the midst of year 4 and they’re off to a 1-6 start in Conference play. That being said they entered January 12-1 with a Q1 win over SMU, so they’ve been on the radar the entire way, but it’s slipping fast. I honestly don’t see it turning around all that much, but 6 of their 7 losses are Q1 and they’re going to have plenty of chances to rack up quality wins if they can play better. The analytics don’t point to any strength they can lean on, as they’re essentially just an average team. Looking ahead though is why we’re doing this, and they have 3 out of their next 4 at home with the road trip to S. Carolina being very winnable as well. If they go and win 4 in a row, including home wins over Georgia and Arkansas then they’re on the fast track to punching a ticket to the dance for the first time under McMahon. I am not confident it will come to fruition but certainly you’d hope this week they could beat Mississippi St at home and then they have to survive the Gamecocks on the road. That sets up what would be the most important week of the season after that. For some teams March has all the stakes, but for this year’s LSU go time is now.


–Mountain West–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Utah St (26)

utahst

The Utah St athletic program has an uncanny ability to identify and hire rising head coaches, and after sending Craig Smith to Utah, Ryan Odom now at Virginia and then Danny Sprinkle to Washington, I can only think, where will Jerrod Calhoun end up? The impressive part even beyond that is they’ve made the dance in 6 of the 7 years under 4 different HC’s and look poised to make that 7/8 in Calhoun’s 2nd season. Calhoun’s Aggies have plenty of contributors, but they’re really a 2 headed monster behind familiar face Mason Falslev and transfer MJ Collins. Both of them are 16-19 ppg and are the clear go-to guys, but collectively they’re making for a pretty good defensive unit as they’re top-10 in forcing TO’s. They just struggle on the glass a bit which is dragging that defensive efficiency number down. In terms of big time wins that’s where we start to lose the plot a bit, as they have just 1 Q1 win and it’s barely in there as a road win over Boise St (63). Overall the best team they’ve beaten per the NET is VCU (53). That makes it tough when arguing for at-large positioning. While the computer rankings like them, that can’t be all you have when you head to Selection Sunday. It may end up being the non-con simply wasn’t strong enough for the Aggies, but right now they’re closer to a St. Louis resumé than people probably realize. This week they have a chance to improve on that though as they get San Diego St, which would be the highest ranked team they’ve beaten. Critical for not only the conference race but for resumés as well.

San Diego St (47)

sdsu

The San Diego St Aztecs out in the Mountain West are as reliable as that ’97 pickup your grandpa has out in the garage. Is it going to win a street race? Absolutely not, but it’s going to get the job done and deliver the type of nostalgia that can’t be bought. The Aztecs under Dutcher give you that feeling, as you just expect a grind you down defensive team that is going to score just enough to get it done and land in the NCAA tournament. It was certainly off to a rough start this year, I mean they lost at home to Troy for crying out loud. However, since that 3-3 start they’ve gone 11-2, with wins over Boise/Nevada/New Mexico to take a stronghold on the conference lead. What they also have that the rest of the conference doesn’t is the strong non-con SOS, and while they didn’t win those top shelf games they will get credit from the committee for going out and playing them. They’ll need that credit, because similar to Utah St they only have 1 Q1 win that is barely qualifying with the road win over Nevada (73). Overall the New Mexico (43) win is their best, but suffice to say they need to stay hot and keep racking up wins as the Mountain West has very little to offer in terms of Q1 opportunities. This week does offer up one of those rare opportunities though as they head to Utah St. Win that and they’ve not only tightened their grip on the regular season title they position themselves very well for a tourney bid.

New Mexico (43)

unm

Eric Olen has come over from UC San Diego and done a fantastic job keeping the Pitino inspired momentum rolling here for the Lobos. It’s a rag tag group that’s led by 2 freshmen, one stateside sniper Jake Hall and Croatian big man Tomislav Buljan who is one of the best rebounders in the sport. While it wasn’t the smoothest transition out of the gates (lost to New Mexico St early) they have bounced back and arguably have the best resumé of the MW teams due to the wins over Santa Clara (45) and VCU (53). Given the weak nature of the bubble this year I do think those are going to carry a lot of weight as strong non-con wins, they just have to pick up a few more Q1/2 wins to improve that 5-3 Q1/2 record. Right now they are pretty universally in that Last 4 In group, so the margins are razor thin and they’re working against the power conference teams who are getting top-50 chances left and right. They can’t afford to take on water with bad losses, and this week is fraught with those opportunities as they head to UNLV and San Jose St. Have to take care of business because the meat of the schedule is around the corner.


–WCC–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track:

Gonzaga (4)

zags

Mark Few continues his run as one of the most consistent Head Coaches the sport has ever seen, as the Zags are once again up near the top. They have just 1 loss to Michigan, so really making the tournament is all about avoiding disaster down the stretch in the WCC. They have a buffer with those non-con wins over Bama, UK and UCLA, but the recent injury bug has thrown a bit of a wrench in things. It hasn’t been a total crowbar in the bike wheel, but losing Braden Huff for 4-8 weeks and then Graham Ike short term with an ankle sprain resulted in them going down to the wire with San Francisco the other night. I don’t think the committee would punish them too hard if they did stub their toe in this stretch without their two most important players, but they’d have to be confident both are back and healthy come Selection Sunday. Sounds like that will be the case, but they’ll certainly hope they can at least get Ike back for this Saturday’s matchup with St. Mary’s. These 2 facing off has been the most fun WCC rivalry over the years, and after the Gaels took 2 of 3 from them last year you know they’re going to be geared up for this one. Health is obviously a story, but the concerns around that would be quelled with a W over their biggest competition in conference.

Teetering:

Saint Mary’s (30)  

smc

Just like we’ve become accustomed to seeing Gonzaga at the top of the WCC, it’s like an old familiar bedtime story to hear Randy Bennett and St. Mary’s are one step behind yet again. This year’s version of the Gaels are led by a dynamic trio of Paulas Marauskas, Mikey Lewis and Donovan Dent, all averaging at least 13 ppg. They aren’t quite as good as they’ve been in the past defensively, and that likely is why we see them struggling to pick up a Q1 win and lower in the NET. Right now their best win is a neutral site W over VA Tech which is right on the Q1/2 line. That certainly isn’t going to be enough in my estimation to get them into the dance, so grabbing a win over Gonzaga is going to be paramount if they want to get back to the dance. Fortunately the Zags are limping into the matchup on Saturday, so it’s as good a time as ever to pick them off and get that signature win to bring to the table on Selection Sunday. If they can’t go to Spokane and win for the 2nd year in a row then they’ll have to wait until the final game of the season when they host the Zags. A game that always carries massive stakes with even heightened importance? Sign me up.

Outside Looking In:

Santa Clara (45)

Herb Sendek has been knocking on the door in Santa Clara for a couple of year’s now and it looks like he may finally have the horses (broncos to be specific) to breakthrough and get to the dance. To put it in perspective they haven’t gone dancing since 1996. What a story it would be, and they’ve earned their way into this conversation with wins over St. Mary’s, McNeese and Nevada for 3 top-70 wins. That honestly puts them in a similar tier as the Mountain West teams in terms of resumé, and while the prognosticators don’t seem to have them there, I don’t think there’s any question they belong in that level of the conversation. Will this 3-bid WCC require Gonzaga to lose to both St. Mary’s and Santa Clara at some point? Probably, but given they’re beat up it feels like it’s as possible as it’s been since the days BYU was also in this mix. They have 5 more games against sub-100 teams that they need to take care of and then they host Gonzaga on February 14. It’s not often that a Santa Clara vs Gonzaga game will be must-watch TV, but with so much at stake for the Broncos you can bet my eyes will be fixated.


–A-10–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

St. Louis (19)

Once again we have Josh Schertz at the apex of the mid-major at-large debate as he has his new school following a very similar path as his 2024 Indiana St team did. Robbie Avila is a name we will all remember from that team and he’s still doing his thing for Schertz, but this team is deep and balanced, with 6 guys averaging double figures. They are also metric darlings, top-25 in NET, and have just 1 loss on a neutral site to Stanford. What that leads us to is Bracket Matrix composite having them an 8 seed despite their best win being over 45th NET ranked Santa Clara, and overall just a 2-1 record in Q1/2. As I have mentioned throughout the Watch, this is a weak year resumé wise on the bubble, but just as I was with Indiana St I am very pessimistic when it comes to believing the committee is going to reward a team who has just 1 win over a top-50 opponent and just 3 wins over top-100 teams. Do we really think they deserve to be over teams like Kentucky/Wisconsin/Auburn who have significantly better wins and equivalent or better losses (albeit more total)? We are going to be weighing in on this debate all season, knowing my position will make readers unhappy.I have to follow what history tells us though, as the committee has not been kind to teams with shiny records that don’t have a lot of meat on the Q1/2 bone. They can’t afford any major hiccups as we go, and certainly will need to capitalize on the few chances the A-10 is going to provide.

Outside Looking in:

VCU (54)

I look at VCU in a similar way as I do Utah St, just a program that can cycle through HC’s and always stay relevant in a way very few mid-major programs are able to do. After Ryan Odom took his talent to Virginia they simply went and Phil Martelli Jr after he took Bryant to the NCAA tourney. Year 1 got off to a rocky start, but it’s mostly due to the fact they went out and played a tough non-con schedule. Unfortunately they went 0-3 in Q1 chances and have followed that up in A-10 play by losing 2 of their very few Q1 chances in conference play. That puts them in a brutal situation, as a team with 0 Q1 wins is just simply not going to get in the dance. Now, they do have a neutral site win over VA Tech that could flip if the Hokies get inside the top-50, but if they want to have a legit shot at an at-large invite to the big show they need to find a way to win @ St. Louis as that’s their only Q1 shot left on the board. They don’t go to George Washington and Dayton is not going to qualify as Q1, so at this point that game on Feb 20 is looming large. Even still, in this year’s weak bubble they will remain in the conversation at 4-6 in Q1/2, especially since their non-con SOS is strong. You still would like to see them push it to .500 or better to build some confidence in an at-large bid. A 2 or 3 bid A-10 is on the table, but it is going to take near perfection from a couple of these teams, along with a continued weak bubble from the power conferences. Possible, but not all too probable.

George Mason (69)

George Mason stubbed their toe in a major way on Saturday as they had been cruising along with just 1 loss to VA Tech on the road and looking like they were 1 big win away from being a true contender for an at-large. The road loss to Rhode Island takes some shine off of this thing, especially with the dreadful SOS numbers and the lack of high quality wins. Right now they boast a home win over VCU, and not much else. Nevertheless, an 18-2 start deserves a spot on the watch and a shoutout must be made to Tony Skinn for getting them in this position in year 3. He has constructed this team almost exclusively through the portal after last year’s senior laden group won 15 league games. At this point getting the Patriots into the dance is all about the last week of the season, as barring an implosion they should set themselves up with 2 Q1 games to make or break their season. They go to VCU and then host St. Louis to finish off the regular season. If they were to run the table and then split those 2 games, or even win both, then we’d be talking legitimately about an at-large berth. That’s what it will take though, as the SOS is atrocious and going to the committee with a shiny record made up of primarily Q3/4 wins is not going to cut it. That’s a treacherous road requiring near perfection the rest of the way, but a path it is nonetheless.


–Others–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Miami (OH) (48)

The emerging story of college basketball are your Miami RedHawks who have, seemingly out of nowhere, gotten off to a 20-0 start to this season. They are a very balanced group with 5 guys averaging double figures so credit to HC Travis Steele who has recruited and developed many of these guys, with only a couple of transfers who also were here last season. It’s a great mid-major story, and nice to see considering how top heavy the sport is feeling in the portal/NIL era. Now, I hate to take the air out of the balloon, but I’m sure you’re aware at this point the schedule is Charmin soft, which unfortunately is very bad news when it comes to evaluating them for an at-large spot. I have already heard the discussions beginning to take place about what would happen if they run the table and then lose in the MAC tourney. Similar to St. Louis, I have very little hope that the committee would give an at-large spot to a team without a top-50 win. They would have benefitted greatly from a trip to Akron, but unfortunately their only matchup with them was at home and is just a Q2 win. It would be an unprecedented resumé I will admit, but it is likely they would be stacked up next to high major teams who would likely have several top-50 wins. The only way I see it happening is if it’s a close loss to Akron, and even then they need the other bubble resumé’s to be weak. We’ll of course be tracking this week by week, but I know I’ll be rooting hard for the Miami (OH) at-large conversation to be moot come Selection Sunday.

Championship DNA: Week 6 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

The story that is clearly emerging as we blaze our way through January, is that the top of the sport is the strongest we have ever seen it (in this context ever is since 2002, where my data begins). We currently have 8 teams in either Great or Elite territory (see chart below), which would smash the record of 5 which we saw both last year and in 2019. The important thing to highlight here is of those 10 in ’25 and ’19, 9 of them made it at least to the Elite 8, with both national champions being “Elite”. What I’m suggesting is we are looking primed for another top heavy tournament in March, with the top seeds getting through the first few rounds consistently, unlike say 2023 when there was just 1 Great team and 0 Elite and absolute pandemonium broke out in March with the Final 4 being seeds 4/5/9/9. I would bet strongly we don’t see anything like that play out, with likely top seeded Arizona/Duke/Michigan/Iowa St/Houston all looking strong analytically. What I’m seeing are some titanic matchups between really good teams starting in the Sweet 16 and continuing from there, making this potentially less wild and chaotic but possibly the most treacherous road to a title we’ve ever seen. You are simply going to have to knock off 3-4 very strong teams to cut the nets down in Indy. So while we may not have the cinderella runs we’ve all become accustomed to, the 2nd and 3rd weekends should feature some incredible games between high powered teams. True hoops fans rejoice.

Week 6 Thoughts:

We are still going to be upsetting UConn fans as they linger down away from the top contenders, but I want to mention I still have them as a 1 seed in the tournament. This is not a resumé tool this is just an analytics based look at where teams stand compared to historical results. The Huskies offense simply needs to improve for them to be considered more reliable, it is a vulnerability at this stage those other teams don’t have. Next, we have to talk Vandy, who has now dropped 3 in a row and slid from borderline Elite to the triad of Wannabe/Strong Enough/Solid. The data doesn’t know what to make of them anymore than I do, but one thing is for sure, defensively they have regressed with the increased competition in the SEC. Nebraska is trending in the other direction, moving closer and closer to Great territory as they remain undefeated. That matchup with Michigan looms large next week, but even a close loss would cement them as a true contender. Speaking of Michigan, the Juggernaut Watch is taking a pause for a week as they fell below that > 50 Net++ spread, while Arizona continues to inch closer themselves. Lastly, we have to mention Virginia again, as they have made one of the largest jumps we’ve seen, moving all the way into Great territory after being a Matador in our 1st edition. Massive improvement defensively, even with the jump in competition in the ACC so shoutout to Ryan Odom and the Hoos. That about does it so until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 5 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

It’s been over a month now of tracking the top teams in the country, and with even more data backing up where every team is falling I thought week 5 would be a great chance to highlight the big movers as well as the teams who have solidified who they are. The biggest takeaway looking at week 1 to now has to be Virginia, who has moved all the way from Matador territory to borderline great at this point. They have vastly improved defensively while maintaining their strength on the other side, so huge shoutout to Ryan Odom in year one there. Shoutout also to Nebraska fans as their long awaited arrival into a reliable archetype has finally arrived. Still undefeated, the Cornhuskers have finally wedged themselves into hopefully a place that will quiet some of the calls for more respect. The early season close calls with USC Upstate and Winthrop are probably still holding them back, but they are surging and have at least established themselves as a reliable defensive team that can score enough to count on them.

On the flip side there are teams like Michigan St, Alabama, Arkansas and Texas Tech who are top 4-5 seeds right now who do not look to be trustworthy due to various inadequacies. That’s the ultimate goal of what we’re trying to do here, identify the risky bets when March rolls around, and identify who are the most trustworthy. The latter group is led by Michigan, who remains alive in our continued Juggernaut Watch, as they remain just above that threshold that has seen just 5 teams on the Jug side enter the tournament, all reaching at least the Final 4. The loss to Wisconsin showed they are human, but they acquitted themselves well in the bounce back spot and remain the leader in the clubhouse. Arizona is the other team holding strong though, as we’ve fallen from a year high of 6 Elite teams to just 3, with Vandy, Duke and Iowa St all suffering setbacks. I point this out to show just how difficult it is for these top teams to hold the kind of consistency required to enter March Madness as Elite. Which is why there have been seasons with 0 in there as recent as 2023. So, while there are some out there who would argue for Michigan St over Gonzaga, the analytical profiles suggest Gonzaga has a better chance of reaching the title game than Sparty does getting out of the first weekend (side note the numbers don’t take into account Braden Huff’s injury, we’ll see how they fare without him in the coming weeks.)

Would love to hear any questions you have on methodology or the history of all of this and I can address those next week. Until then, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 4 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

Welcome back to another week of this journey to track the top teams in the country and how they stack up compared to teams of the past, from an analytical standpoint. What I’m going to address this week are the “notches” in the Wannabe category that had UNC fans upset last week, with Nebraska and Texas Tech fans likely joining them this week. Let me first say, and I can’t emphasize this enough, these archetypes exist independent of this season’s teams and where they fall. They were created using historical results of actual teams in March going back to 2002. I have compiled the results for the teams that fall into those notches as a proof of exactly why I included them into the Wannabe archetype and not Strong Enough. From a data standpoint they align much closer with Wannabe results, with a better 1st and 2nd round result but actually a worse track record beyond that. A strong enough team is 10 times more likely to reach the Final 4, and > 20 points more reliable round by round to advance. Here is the data, and it’s listed again below the full table for easy comparison below.

From a basketball perspective, the general philosophy behind this is pretty simple, but allow me to explain. A team like Texas Tech has a clear weakness, defense. Their offense is not “strong enough” to reliably make up for that inadequacy in a single elimination tournament. The inverse applies to Nebraska, as they’re very good defensively but not enough to make up for the lack of offensive ability. That is the general idea, as it stands to reason as you get worse on one end of the floor you better be able to make up for on the other end. So, you tighten the constraints, which is what gives the jagged look as you go from Strong Enough-Solid-Solid-Strong Enough. Also, I understand the record of these teams, specifically Nebraska who is 15-0, but this one week snapshot doesn’t pigeon hole them forever. The Kenpom data is predictive, and given they played teams like Winthrop and USC Upstate to single digit finals, you can assume the next 15 games might go a little different. The beauty of this series is we’ll track it all the way through Selection Sunday, so we’ll see how it plays out.

Week 4 Thoughts:

The Juggernaut Watch is alive and well, but Michigan is pushing the boundary so we’ll see if they can keep up their level of domination as we’re still just now approaching the halfway point. The other big story has to be the 6 Elite teams, which would break the record currently held by the 2019 season which had 5. This story to me is a continuation from last season, as in my opinion we are watching a transformation of the sport playing out in real time. The top teams are just more complete than we have seen in the past, with the ability to add veteran depth through the portal in a way that has just never existed. Yes, we had grad transfers in the past, but the way rosters are able to transform and allow for coaches to plug holes or improve weaknesses is something we haven’t seen at this scale. Coaches are understanding how to roster build, and with that I think we will continue to see a larger group of dominant teams at the top of the sport. I could be wrong, but I do think, at least at the top, teams have improved and March will be a bit less unpredictable, a la last season. Some other notable storylines we’re tracking would be led by UConn still existing in just the Solid archetype, much to the chagrin of Husky fans. The offensive numbers have improved, but much of the country certainly has a perspective of UConn right now that doesn’t align with the data. A beautiful opportunity to test the collective hive mind vs the analytics. Finally, Vandy had a prove it moment the other night and knocked off Alabama, their biggest win to date and a bit of a solidifying moment that this team is a legit contender, not just in the SEC but for a deep March run. We’ll continue to track all of these movements and respond with data to all questions/concerns about the overall methodology. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 3 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

We’re back and as requested I’m going to quickly dive into each archetype with an explanation and some info on methodology. You can skip ahead if that’s not of interest.

Elite: This one feels self explanatory a bit but these are the best of the best teams in the country, with top of the sport strength on both ends of the floor. Numbers wise the cutoffs are relatively the top 8-12 teams each year, give or take, with the idea that the teams that are that good on both sides of the floor are your truly elite overall teams, and the results speak for themselves.

Great: For Great we take a step down, allowing for a little wider threshold but still capturing some of the best teams in the country. There have been years where there are only 1 or 2 Elite teams, with the occasional 0, so in theory the best team in a given year could only fit into the Great archetype. The numbers are relatively similar to Elite early in the tournament, but by the Elite 8/Final 4 we see a big dropoff, which made me feel confident we had drawn a necessary line in the sand.

Solid: Again we widen the net to capture the good teams who still are balanced enough to find fairly reliable results in March, but obviously have a weakness emerging that trips up teams with this makeup far more than the archetypes above them. The lines drawn here, if you were here last week, were clearly some of the trickier to determine, but it started on feel and observation and were refined with backtesting. I feel confident the areas left out align closer with the unreliable Archetype’s than this one.

Strong Enough: You will notice the main difference here is the notch on the chart, where we’ve tightened the screws on a teams strength to be required to be great, in order to makeup for the weakness getting even weaker in this archetype. That change helped strengthen the reliability of this group, suggesting again that as you grow more and more unbalanced, the stronger your strength needs to be to find consistent success in March. As far as the lines to separate Matadors/Grinders, again it was initially chosen on feel and refined from there with backtesting. It usually lies somewhere around the top-50, give or take a few depending on the year.

Matadors: These are the teams that put on a show offensively, but as the saying goes, they play olé defense which is the inspiration for the name. The idea here is simple, they cannot be trusted because while they are very good offensively, to win 4 or 5 or 6 straight games against high quality opponents, you are eventually going to need to get stops and these teams can’t do it reliably. Again, the data agrees, they are not to be trusted. Although that does not mean it is impossible, but a Matador has never (since 2002 when my data begins) won the title so there’s that.

Grinders: Similar to the Matadors this is the group that has a big weakness but is very strong on the other end of the floor. These teams actually struggle even more than Matadors overall, suggesting while defense may win championships it can’t be done without some semblance of reliable scoring. Last year this included St. John’s, many people’s favorite to challenge for a Final 4, who ultimately bowed out in the 2nd round. This entire project began when I started drawing these lines, with the hunch that these teams who are very unbalanced struggled in March. Here we are with strong data to backup what was an initial feeling.

Wannabe: The name here is an ode to the fact these teams all have somewhat of an identity, but it just happens to be inferior to the teams we are deeming reliable. A team like Texas Tech right now for example is much better offensively than defensively, but they aren’t as good as they need to be to make up for their inefficient defense. They wannabe that elite offensive team that can get by with some defensive holes, but it’s just not there. It can happen on the flip side as well, with teams like UNC and Indiana displaying that right now. Even our balanced but not overly special teams in the center like UK or Iowa just don’t have the overall strength to be reliable. The cutoffs were essentially to try and see if hey do these teams just on the outside looking in of our reliable group drop off that heavy? The answer is a resounding yes, but still they do perform a bit better than the truly average teams in Vanilla.

Vanilla: Another pretty self explanatory one here but this is just the leftover archetype where some of the teams may squeak into. Often the fringe of the top-40, but the interesting ones are similar to this year’s Villanova team where they have had success, actually inside the top-30 overall even, but still just overall not consistently good on either end. Not a good track record in March to say the least.

Week 3 Thoughts:

Well, it wouldn’t be right if we didn’t mention the Juggernaut Watch is still in effect as Michigan has done nothing to suggest otherwise since we last met. Now, it’s officially Big Ten season the rest of the way for the Wolverines, so we’ll see if the dominance continues as they travel to some of these tough environments. They currently sit 2nd in Net Eff++ behind only the 2015 UK team that didn’t lose a game until the Final 4 (a loss to the all-time best off eff++ Wisconsin). Next, we have to mention Duke, who stubbed their toe in a loss to Texas Tech and then survived a scare at home to GA Tech after that. Those results were enough to drop them from Elite to Great. A big shift, but with less than half of the overall data points to be collected, we are still going to see bigger shifts after 1 or 2 games until we load up more and more data. By the end of February, results like those won’t move the needle as much because it will be 1 or 2 points in a pool of 30, not 12. Worth noting, as we saw several other big moves like St. John’s falling to unreliable, Purdue rising to Great, and BYU falling to Solid. There will continue to be shifts, but that’s why we’re here, as storylines will continue to develop and then play out. Can Duke recover? Will the shine rub off the Wolverines? Is Vandy as Elite just lipstick on a pig? Are UConn fans going to see the data align with their perception of their team? All questions we will find answers to over the next 2.5 months of ball. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 2 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

We’re back for an update and we have some adjustments to discuss as we continue to mold this new project. The biggest change was to the “Solid” Archetype where I cut out what I would say was a hole in the middle, where the teams that lied there were neither Great offensively or defensively, kind of living in a middle ground. This currently is where Nebraska and Iowa reside, and once I ran the numbers they aligned, results wise, closer to the Wannabe archetype than the Solid archetype. This move shored up the Solid group to make it more reliable and right in line with Strong Enough as a 3rd tier grouping of reliability behind Elite and Great, with little change to the Wannabe archetype – an easy decision.

Next was just a potentially temporary move to help showcase how ridiculous Michigan has been so far, as they currently sit in a territory only 5 teams have occupied since 2002. All 5 of those teams made it to the Final 4 with 3 of them advancing to the title game. Clearly that is off the charts reliability, as a 100% hit rate on Final 4 trips is unprecedented. The line of demarcation is a > 50 net efficiency++, or spread between O++ and D++. I have chiseled out that section and dubbed it the “Juggernaut” archetype. The rarity calls for special treatment in my opinion, and it will be fascinating to watch and see if they can keep this level of play up all the way to March entering the tourney. For reference, 2024 Florida is included in this along with 2019 Virginia who both won the title. The all-time biggest spread was 2015 Kentucky who went undefeated until the Final 4, and Michigan trails then by a couple of tenths of a point so very close.

Week 2 Thoughts:

As I said above Michigan is the story at the top, but we still have 5 Elite teams which would tie the record all-time and surpass last year’s 4. Overall with the carve out in the Solid group as well as some teams rising and falling we’ve dropped to just 16 in our reliable categories after debuting with 20. I still expect efficiencies to drop as most teams have 18-20 games against conference opponents to go, so competition will rise and teams will have poor showings. On a micro level, clearly Vandy has to be the surprise of the season jumping all the way into “Great” territory with 3-star Sophomore PG Tyler Tanner being the story early on. I think most of the others involved here are usual suspects, and while some may be over-performing to have Vandy what I would consider 7th overall and the leader in the SEC is shocking. Bama has finally fallen to where I think they should reside as a Matador, and Kansas has become our first Grinder to watch. Last year it was St. John’s holding down the grinder spot week after week, and they were upset in R2. I don’t want to be alarmist for Jayhawk fans so I’ll say it’s just December, long way to go and your best player has been hurt so remain calm. All in all it’s still early but some interesting story lines are developing. Next update will be 2 weeks from now as I’ll pause for Christmas. See you then.

Championship DNA: Week 1 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

Welcome to the place where we have set out to use historical March Madness results to try and identify the characteristics that most often lead to success in the big dance. Or simply, to define what true Championship DNA looks like. I understand many will scoff at the idea of basketball being reduced to numbers on a screen, and trust me I can sympathize with that, but what I’ve done is accept the reality that my own eyeballs cannot consistently make correct predictions in March. Data can do a much better job than my eyeballs, and most likely yours as well. I’m here to show you that you in fact can reliably start to sort the top teams in the country and recognize which teams are going to have the best shot at the Final 4 and ultimately winning a national title. Many have tried, often saying something like “no team outside of x or outside of y that also hasn’t done z has won it all”, but I’m going to try and make it more about reliability than elimination. Allow me to explain.

The Data:

The base layer of this is that I’ve taken pre-tourney Kenpom efficiency data from every season since 2002 and compiled it. The obvious thing when looking at the numbers on the surface is that the game is changing stylistically as teams chase offensive efficiency and overall offensive skill develops. To put it concretely, average offensive efficiency in 2002 was 102 while currently in 2025 it is 107.4. To get even more granular, the 2nd best offensive team in 2002 was Oregon with an Ortg of 119.9. Today they would rank 23rd. In their day, that Oregon team was an elite offensive group relative to their competition, so we need a way to normalize this rating in order to fairly judge teams across time. We need to put every current team on the exact same scale, so we’ll be using normalized efficiency (OE++ / DE++) so a dominant 2002 offense isn’t punished next to today’s higher-scoring game. Think of it like this: KenPom data will tell you who’s good any given year relative to that year’s competition. OE++ and DE++ tell you how good they are compared to every tournament field for the last 23 years. Ultimately, the goal was to confidently be able to remove team name and season, and be left with a fair assessment of all teams since 2002 and their results in March.

Once the data was compiled it was time to test my original theory and see if I could identify common characteristics that most often led to deep runs in the tournament. My original hypothesis was that despite high overall efficiency, the teams that lean heavily on one end of the floor struggle more than well balanced teams, even if less efficient overall. As I studied and pulled the data my hypothesis was largely proven right, so I began to try and classify certain archetypes of teams. I landed on 8 key archetypes; Elite – Great – Solid – Strong Enough – Matadors – Grinders – Wannabes – Vanilla. Here is the table with exact historical results: Note: R2 indicates teams who reached the 2nd round, all the way to CH which indicates the teams who reached the Title game (46 total over 23 years).

For some additional proof this is still applying today even as the game changes:

2025: Final 4 was comprised of our 4 Elite teams. A direct reflection of how strong the field was at the top.

2024: Only 1 Elite team – UConn who won the title

2023: 0 Elite teams and the bracket descended into madness. However, our 2nd most reliable team UConn (Strong Enough) won the title as a 4 seed.

For a clear example of this playing out on the other end of the spectrum with specific ++ data consider this. Of the top-5 OE++ teams since 2002, two of them lost the first weekend – 2012 Mizzou (Matador) and 2014 Creighton (Matador). Both of them struggled to defend, which is why they landed in the matador archetype, and they suffered first weekend upsets. Meanwhile, the other 3 all fell in a reliable archetype and made deep runs, including the greatest offensive team 2015 Wisconsin (OE++ 131.87) who lost in the title game to Duke.

While nothing is 100% you can clearly see the stronger you are overall, combined with the ability to succeed on both ends of the floor, are strong indicators of your reliability to have March success. So, moving forward I am going to post a weekly update on Friday morning’s showing where the top-40 teams in Kenpom stand. For context, entering the tournament just 5 of the 92 (5.4%) total Final 4 teams since 2002 have entered the tourney outside the top-40 so that is why I landed on 40.

It begins today: Here is your Week 1 Championship DNA Board

Week 1 Thoughts:

The obvious thing jumping out at me early this year is we have a lot of really good teams at the top of the sport right now. I have a few thoughts on why, but let’s just get it out there, 20 teams in my reliable archetypes, including 5 in elite, would make for an outlier season. I do not expect that to be the final number once we get to Selection Sunday. In general, these efficiency numbers tend to bloat early in the season thanks to cupcakes on the schedule that the really good teams handle with ease, so I expect the rigor of conference play to diminish the number of teams in these reliable archetypes at least by a handful. There is a competing force as well though, as I do think the transfer portal and influx of talent from overseas is causing the teams at the top to improve. It has never been easier for a team to plug holes, reload after guys leave and even add depth, than it is right now. Unfortunately, for those who love upsets and chaos in March, we may be moving toward an era where that is drastically reduced. I don’t want to jump to that conclusion just yet, but after last year having all 4 number 1 seeds be dominant teams that all made the Final 4, and the way this year is starting out, you can’t help but go there. The exciting thing is we’re going to get to see this all play out as this will be a weekly update, so we’ll see if it’s more bloat from early season cupcakes or if we truly are seeing a concentration of talent at the top of the sport. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

ACC College Basketball 2025-26 Season Preview

RankTeam
1.Duke
2.Louisville
3.UNC
4.NC State
5.Notre Dame
6.Syracuse
7.SMU
8.Virginia
9.Clemson
10.Miami
11.Stanford
12.Georgia Tech
13.Wake Forest
14.Pitt
15.Florida St
16.Cal
17.Boston College
18.Virginia Tech


1.) Duke (#5)

Rinse and repeat for Duke right now as they continue to roll in top FR classes that produce one-and- done NBA talent while competing at the top level of the sport. Jon Scheyer has made a seamless transition to HC after Coach K’s retirement and seems to be elevating each year, with last year’s ACC title and Final 4 trip major feathers in his cap as he continues to prove himself. What’s most impressive is he’s getting the more unheralded guys to stick around, which helps with roster continuity and means he doesn’t have to rely on the portal. They are up there with Purdue/Houston/UConn in terms of being able to hold on to guys and develop them into great players, which feels old school at this point with how much roster turnover there is. Now to this year, as we have 4 more one-and-done prospects joining that group of 6 returners all looking to fill the void left behind by the 5 NBA draft picks from last year’s group. The Boozer twins are the big name tickets, but Dame Sarr is expected to come in and be a major impact guy and Khamenia is also highly regarded and should push returning wing Isaiah Evans for time. It feels like Boozer/Foster/Evans in the backcourt with Sarr and the other Boozer inside, but they also have more experienced guys in Brown and Ngongba at their disposal as well. It’s an embarrassment of riches for Scheyer as even if the youngsters aren’t ready right away he has a group of returning guys that could be a competitive starting 5 themselves. The ceiling obviously is going to be determined by the FR and their ability to be productive, and Cam Boozer already looks the part. They may take a small step back defensively I will say, as Flagg and Maluach inside made life very difficult for teams with their length, but they’ve been consistently strong on that end under Scheyer even without those 2 so major regression not expected. At the end of the day, they should be one of the best teams in the country and really only challenged by Louisville at the top of the ACC, with a goal of a return to the Final 4 very realistic, especially if the FR can be stars.

2.) Louisville (#12)

Pat Kelsey has my complete and total respect after what he did last year, taking a Louisville program that was dead and instantly reviving them. To paint the picture, they had endured 2 seasons that saw them go 5-35 in ACC play prior to his arrival. Immediately, he got them to the tourney and a staggering 18-2 record in ACC play. Unreal, and one of the best stories in all of college hoops last year, and it looks like it should continue. He brings back a major piece in J’Vonne Hadley and also promising big man Kasean Prior who was really good for 7 games until he got injured for the season. Top-50 recruit Khani Rooths is back as well and Khalifa and Rodgers should be good depth pieces. The story is going to be the backcourt additions, and man do I love a HC who has some self awareness and understands how to build a roster to fit his system. Kelsey loves playing fast and launching from deep, and the transfer guards coming in all scored 14+ ppg while shooting over 40% from 3 last year, with Conwell and McKneeley doing it at the P5 level. On paper it’s one of the most dangerous teams in the country in terms of outside shooting, as Hadley also shot well at 38% from 3 last year. I fully expect them to leap into the top-10 offensively this year, as they kind of struggled at times shooting and finished below 33% from the outside. That number is going to jump up dramatically with this backcourt. On top of the transfers they added 5-star freshman PG Mikel Brown Jr, who is undoubtedly going to be an important playmaker and has a chance to average a lot of assists with all of these shooters around him. With all of that said it’s pretty obvious what I think of this Louisville team, and while I won’t predict them to win the natty, if they can defend at the same level they did last year they are clearly a Final 4 threat with all this firepower offensively.

3.) North Carolina

There’s no way around it, this program is slipping under Hubert Davis, with last year’s disappointment just the latest step toward Davis losing control. Even though they were propped up by the committee and given a bid when they likely shouldn’t have been, they still lost in the true 1st round and now see an insane amount of talent leave the program. Not only that, look at what is coming in? Is that the kind of class you would expect from what is supposed to be a top-tier program in the country? I don’t know if he’s not tapped into the resources necessary to hit on the big transfers, or simply guys don’t want to play for him, but to be forced to rely on a guard that scored 10 ppg at Colorado St to replace RJ Davis is a recipe for regression. To say the least, there’s a huge drop off from the top-2 to the rest of the conference, and while there are other programs who are looking to rise up and challenge those 2, the Tar Heels appear to be sprinting the opposite direction. Despite the negative framing, they still should be in the 3rd to 5th range in the ACC, which speaks to the weakness of the ACC in hoops, but this school expects to compete with Duke at the top and be a threat to make the Final 4 every year. Davis earned a longer leash due to the run they went on in year 1 to the title game, but let’s not forget they were a disappointing 8 seed that year. A couple of years later they had a good year, earned a 1 seed and lost in the Sweet 16. My prediction is they are still an ok team, with a strong frontcourt behind Veesar and the 5-Star FR Wilson, but the guard play will not be good enough for them to be a top-25 team. My attitude is more a reflection of how far below expectations for the program they are, and less how bad they will be, as they won’t be bad per se. At the end of the day, given the weakness of the ACC, they probably will be on the bubble again begging the committee to throw them a bone yet again. So how long does this mega brand lift an incompetent HC?

4.) NC State

A program looking to move in the opposite direction of the Tar Heels is this NC State program, as they’ve hired Will Wade from McNeese and he has completely transformed this roster. I will say, we’ve seen these rebuilds have wide ranging results, but what we know about Wade is he can build a program, whether that includes breaking all the rules is a different discussion. He did it at Chattanooga, LSU and then again at McNeese, so the man can coach and evaluate talent. He has brought in a big transfer class of course and it’s headlined by Darrion Williams who will be the man here and is surrounded by some intriguing pieces. The backcourt will likely be some combination of Holloman/Arceneaux/Breed/Copeland. Those guys are solid but not elite by any means, and the frontcourt leaves a little to be desired as well with Ven-Allen Lubin likely the best bet to form an undersized 4/5 combo with Williams. They clearly will lack size, but each of Wade’s last 3 seasons as a HC his teams have been top-15 at generating TO’s so he’s very comfortable playing smaller, more athletic guys that can switch, trap and generally apply pressure defensively. They will struggle to rebound but he hopes to generate more possessions than they give up in the turnover/offensive rebound battle. My biggest worry is outside shooting as none of the transfers have been consistent shooters from 3. They will have to get out and run and get easy buckets in transition, and when they don’t they’ll turn to guys like Williams and Copeland to create both for themselves and others. It’s not a sure thing by any means, but I do think there’s enough meat on this bone for Wade to have some success in year 1. I would predict a tourney appearance but at best like a 7 seed, more likely 10 or the First 4. A good first step, but certainly not a roster that guarantees future or current success.

5.) Notre Dame

I will be honest last year was a disappointment from Coach Shrewsberry and this Irish team, but there were injuries to their top players that impacted it for sure. I entered last year with hope it would be the breakthrough under Shrews, and a year later I’m doubling down, betting that I was simply a year early on my prediction. What I know is this guy can really coach the game, and judging by the fact they were under .500 and only 1 guy transferred out of the program it’s clear he has these guys bought in. Burton is a legit 1st team ACC guy and should be talked about more on All-American lists, and he certainly will be if they turn things around and compete in the ACC. If he and Braeden Shrewsberry can stay healthy this year they form a dynamic backcourt, and they will be surrounded by guys like Sir Mohammed and Cole Certa who are back looking to make SO jumps after coming in as top recruits, as well as another top recruit in Jalen Haralson. As a whole this should be the most talented they’ve been at the 1-4 spots since Shrews has been here, so long as the young guys are developing. The key figure is going to be Carson Towt and how he is able to hold down the 5 spot. He averaged a double-double at Northern Arizona and for this team to have success he has to be the starting 5 and give them something like 8 and 8 a night. With this I’m betting on coaching, development and the idea that the old school way of building a program can still work in college ball. Yes, you can build through the portal with endless money, but I firmly believe you can still recruit, develop and then compete as long as you can get the guys to buy in and stick around. He’s done the latter, now we just need to see the former come to fruition. I think it does this year and they sneak back into the tourney as a dangerous team behind Burton.

6.) Syracuse

Syracuse appears to be yet another victim of poor hiring in the ACC as Red Autry has gone just 20-22 in a bad ACC over his first 2 seasons at the helm. This has to be his last chance to prove he can succeed as the HC here, as the talent on the roster is plenty good enough to get to the tournament, and certainly shouldn’t wind up 115th in the final KP rankings like last year. They brought in Nait George to run the point next to JJ Starling giving them a very strong backcourt. Those guys will be complimented by Kingz and the freshmen Sadiq White and Kiyan Anthony (son of legendary Carmelo Anthony). The added excitement of having Melo’s son on the roster is only going to heighten the expectations from the fanbase, and frankly where I have them in this preview is where the expectation should be. Freeman is a beast inside and the backcourt is full of guys who can score the rock. The onus is on Autry to get them to play winning basketball and not like a glorified AAU team. That is the big question, and I could go on and on as to why that will or will not happen. What I’ve chosen to do is properly lay out what should be expected, independent of whether or not I believe Autry has what it takes to accomplish the feat. As I’ve said before, coaching is largely measured by your success relative to expectations, so to properly set them here at a tourney berth and being competitive with the upper echelon in this conference sets us up to fairly judge Autry. To this point he’s done less with more, so we’ll see if he can finally turn the talent here into winning.

7.) SMU

I actually have some hope for what Andy Enfield is doing here with SMU as I think they over-performed their talent level last year, and while they did lose Chuck Harris I think the combo of Pierre and Washington could make them more explosive this year. Boopie Miller will still run the show, and they should get some development from Yigitoglu who was a bright spot in year 1 here. They will need some of these young guys to get up to speed quickly though as their depth is mostly going to be from this big group of FR. As an aside, being a Pacers fan and seeing the name Jermaine O’Neal Jr popup is both a nice bump of nostalgia as well as a reminder of how old I am, but even aside from my own connections it is wild as someone born in the 90’s how many of these NBA player’s sons are entering college hoops right now. Back to the issue at hand though, how good can this team really be? I actually do think the ceiling here could be squeaking into the tourney, as Miller is dynamic and I do think the transfers in will help replace what was lost and maybe even elevate them. I’ll say it again, but a couple of the FR absolutely have to emerge and give them productive minutes off the bench, and if that happens they will have a fighting chance to breakthrough and get back to the dance.

8.) Virginia

Unfortunately, we aren’t even halfway through the ACC and I’m already beyond the teams I have hope for making the tourney this year, and boy do we have a ways to go. We’ll start with this Virginia team that is still desperately trying to get a grip on things after Tony Bennett’s sudden retirement prior to last season. They endured one disappointing season under interim Ron Sanchez that saw them go sub .500 for the first time since Bennett’s first year here in 2010 and quickly moved on to rising star Ryan Odom. Odom has made stops at UMBC (where he famously beat UVA as a 16 seed), Utah St and VCU, taking all of them to the dance by year 2 there. If you’re a UVA fan that’s where your hope lies, trusting he will be able to do here what he did at his previous stops with fewer resources. I already think in year 1 there is at least some hope you’ll see a step in the right direction, as the backcourt looks like it could be pretty strong with Malik Thomas, Dallin Hall and Jacari White. The strength of that trio, and even beyond them to guys like Lewis and Tillis, is outside shooting, as they have 4 guys who shot 39% or better last year. Inside is a big question mark but hey, for a school that has played at a snails pace and struggled to score maybe a year of scoring with fun guards will be a breath of fresh air, even if they struggle to rebound and defend the paint. I expect a step in the right direction but not an instant turnaround, with eyes on year 2 under Odom being the year they get back into contention.

9.) Clemson

Out of respect to Brad Brownell and what he is usually able to accomplish I have Clemson right here in the middle of the league, but it would not be hyperbole to suggest this is one of the worst rosters on paper he has had. Nick Davidson coming in gives them a glimmer of hope, but ultimately it’s a bunch of young FR and mid major transfers trying to compete in what is supposed to be a power conference league. What you can learn by looking at his tenure here though is he has had issues building sustained success YOY. I fear this will be one of those regression years as he tries to reload with young talent that he eventually develops into a tourney worthy team a season or two down the road. He faces challenges that some of these SEC programs do where the focus is fully on football, so his success is a major credit to his coaching ability and knack for finding unheralded guys and developing them into productive ACC players. Is this the 9th most talented roster in the conference on paper? No, but I still think he finds a way to get them into the upper half of this league, but that still likely won’t be good enough to get them to a 3rd straight tourney. Step back for Clemson but not anything abnormal for what we’ve seen under Brownell.

10.) Miami

Well, I have no idea what to make of this Miami program as they move on from the Jim Larranaga era that actually saw some successful seasons at various periods, but it really fell off the last couple of years. Being Miami they always are able to bring in talent, so new head man Jai Lucas gets his first crack at being a D1 HC in quite a generous spot in south Florida. He has a trio of transfers that give them some hope in Donaldson, Reneau and Washington, but as we all know a couple of transfers that scored in double figures before does not equate to wins. At the end of the day I have zero clue what style of play Lucas is going to try and put out there or what identity this team will take, but he’s stated he’s a defensive guy which would be a welcome site here where defense has mostly been an afterthought in recent years. I would be shocked if he was able to take this roster and turn it into a tourney team, but you can never say never, and that top trio I mentioned earlier could be good enough if they do play tough D. At the end of the day, this preview probably told you very little other than that Lucas is the new HC, but genuinely how could we know anything beyond that given his lack of experience? That fact could make this a very awesome story if he hits, or a very disappointing hire because this should be a program that can be a top contender in this conference given its location and resources.

11.) Stanford

The Cardinal haven’t been relevant in hoops in a long time, but Kyle Smith enters year 2 with legitimate momentum after taking Stanford above .500 in conference play for the first time since 2018. The bad news is the best talent is gone, but look at that roster retention, that has to be fantastic news for anyone that cares about this program as he clearly has this group bought in to what he’s selling. Do I expect the talent to be good enough to compete? No. However, what I know about Kyle Smith is he is able to extract more out of a roster than you can see on paper, so while the overall returning production is low, the pedigree of talent is low and the incoming guys are unheralded, I think they’ll be feisty and play very hard. That will be good enough to keep them out of the cellar, and while I think the conference record may take a step back, I think there’s an outside chance a star emerges and all of a sudden you have a team to take serious. That’s all my belief in Kyle Smith who built Wazzu into a tourney team with limited talent, primarily by slowing the game down and playing exceptional D. I expect that and because of that I expect them to finish better than the roster suggests.

12.) Georgia Tech

It felt like the 8-4 finish to the season last year could have been the start of something here for Damon Stoudamire, but with the amount of turnover it feels like it’s going to be hard to sustain it. The good news is they played much better defensively, and down the stretch they picked up wins over Louisville and Clemson who were both tourney teams. 3 key pieces are back, but the rest of the production is gone and will have to be replaced by an pretty underwhelming incoming class. The transfers are highlighted by 2 mid-major guards, with Washington likely to start at the point. I’m not going to even criticize Stoudamire in terms of coaching, he just doesn’t have the talent to really compete, and that’s where the criticism comes as he’s in control of that as a talent evaluator. Maybe he’s not getting the resources needed, but whatever the reason they are going to continue to be in the bottom half of this conference without an influx of talent. Don’t get me wrong, they won’t be awful, but in terms of breaking through and seeing a major step forward this isn’t going to be the year, and it’s year 3. Is it ever going to come? So far, he hasn’t cracked the top-100 in final KP standings, so maybe we start with that as a next step.

13.) Wake Forest

I really thought last year was going to be the breakthrough for Steve Forbes at Wake as he finally seemed to have the talent to get to the tourney. They were in great shape, albeit barely, as February came to a close and then they dropped two inexplicable games to Virginia and NC State who were sub-100 ranked teams and it burst their bubble. That core group is now gone, with only a couple of the younger holdovers still around. I have a hard time believing they will be as good as last year’s team based on the talent, but guys like Juke Harris and Omaha Biliew were highly regarded out of high school so maybe they can break out with a larger role. The transfers are all inefficient shooters outside of Mason, so I imagine that will be a major struggle, not to mention the obvious lack of size with nobody over 6’9″ on the roster. Ultimately I’m burned by my faith in them last year and with all that talent gone to waste I just can’t believe in Forbes, not to mention the talent on paper doesn’t jump out at you anyway. Back to irrelevance for Wake this year.

14.) Pitt

I have trouble year in and year out buying into Pitt and Jeff Capel, who has been mostly underwhelming over his 7 seasons at the helm, turning in just 1 trip to the tournament and just 2 seasons above .500 in conference play. What I’m saying is, he’s struggling to attract/evaluate/develop talent to the extent he can compete in the upper half of this conference on a consistent basis. Then I look at this roster and the production that was lost from an already struggling team and wonder how anyone would anticipate this being a step forward for this program. The only way this prediction is way off is if the Australian transfers hit and lead the show alongside Corhen and a developing Cummings. That 1-2 punch should be pretty good, but around them will be a ton of question marks in terms of scoring. Add on to that they’ve only been top-50 defensively once in his 7 years, so don’t expect much on that end either. Long story short, both the on paper talent and history under Capel give me very little hope for Pitt to be relevant in the ACC this year.

15.) Virginia Tech

Mike Young got off to a hot start at VA Tech, getting them to 2 tourney’s in his first 3 seasons, but it’s now been 3 straight seasons at .500 or below in ACC play with no tickets to the dance. This may be his last run at it as I feel like this program does care about being relevant in hoops at least a little bit. My issue with his coaching is they never really are great defensively and they play a slow pace, so they will have to be uber efficient on offense to sustain success. The transfers they brought in at the guards spots are anything but that historically, and while I like Hansberry inside to pair with Lawal I just don’t see the guard play being good enough. They were one of the most turnover prone teams in the country last year so that will need to be rectified as well. I don’t know man, I know they have a coaching search in football upcoming but if I was in Blacksburg and cared about hoops I think I’d be ready to move on. There just seems to be too much to correct from last year, and maybe the international guys, specifically Neoklis Avdalas who has generated some buzz, can come in and help more than I’m giving credence to, but at the end of the day I just don’t see it with this roster in terms of getting into the upper half of the league.

16.) Florida St

Alright so Leonard Hamilton is out after some really good years that were bookended by a nosedive to irrelevancy that saw them finish no better than 79th (KP) or with more than 17 wins over the last 4 seasons. To replace him? A first year HC in Luke Loucks who returns to his alma matter after a coaching stint in the NBA as an assistant, a growing trend we’re seeing across the sport these days. I would imagine we’ll see a NBA style of play here, although that’s not guaranteed it just has to be the assumption as we’ve seen it elsewhere, check out BYU. The issue is the roster as it’s just not very good, albeit with some bright mid-major players you just need more than that to open things up and play free and loose at the college level. They have some good 3 point shooters, but inside has almost no proven commodities and all of the production essentially is at the mid-major level, so assuming it’s all going to translate seamlessly would be naive given what we’ve seen across the sport. Do I think this hire will be a failure? Frankly, I don’t think anyone could possibly know, but year 1 with this roster it would be a major accomplishment to push for a. .500 record in conference. In the ACC that doesn’t get you close to the dance, but it would be a major step toward attracting talent back to Tallahassee, a program that just 5-10 years ago that was a perennial contender in the ACC.

17.) Cal

Another program that is kind of stuck in the mud here with Cal, as they haven’t been relevant since Cuonzo Martin was here almost a decade ago. They’re on HC number 3 since then, with Mark Madsen now entering year 3 trying to get this program off the mat. He has seemingly made no progress, but he’s been bringing in decent talent and he has finished better than predicted by the likes of KP each of his first 2 years. The issue is the starting point, as even with the improvement they have yet to crack the top-100. The incoming talent this year once again provides a touch of hope, as they have some power conference dudes like Chris Bell, Dai Dai Ames and Justin Pippen looking for bigger roles. They have a few guys back as well so hope isn’t at 0 by any means, but when we say hope I really mean to just take another step forward, not to breakthrough by any means. I would be impressed if they could finish above .500 overall and push for .500 in conference play. I doubt they’ll get there, but maybe they could crack the top-100 overall and show some signs of life.

18.) Boston College

I hate to be dismissive but after 4 years of Earl Grant going below .500 here, with year 4 being a bottoming out moment at just 4-16 in the ACC, it’s hard to get even remotely excited about the state of this program. There’s some talent here, there’s some returning pieces that were productive, but how much is that really saying when the team won just 4 games in maybe the worst ACC we’ve ever seen. Once they start taking themselves seriously maybe I will. And to be clear, what I mean is no serious program is holding on to a HC that goes below .500 in conference play in his first 4 years with year 4 being the worst. That is cause for firing at any serious program, yet here we sit heading into year 5 with zero being accomplished and zero momentum being build. Suffice it to say, I don’t have much hope for BC this year.