Bubble Watch NCAAB 2026 – II

What a week across college hoops, and welcome back to what will hopefully become your bubble respite over the next few weeks as we count down to Selection Sunday. The story of the season continued as the top teams in the country, for the most part, continued to dominate their way through conference play. There were a few notable bubble upsets though, with Indiana taking the cake as the story of the week as they racked up 2 big time Q1 wins over Purdue and UCLA to surge to the Last 4 in / First 4 Out discussion. Ultimately though, those stories of picking up big time wins seem few and far between this year, as teams like Virginia Tech, TCU, Wake Forest and many others continue to miss out on chances to knock off the big boys. What that is leading us to is widening our net to try and find more bubble teams in these smaller conferences, with a 3-bid WCC on the table and a 4th and 5th MWC team getting added to the Watch this week. While we are getting some fantastic showdowns with titans in the Big 12 and Big 10, the bubble increasingly looks like it’s going to be filled with mid-major teams piling up wins and holding on to a couple of top-50 wins. That may be enough this year given how teams like Ohio St, Miami, Oklahoma St and more continue to whiff on their chances in conference play. Maybe it will shift, but so far, the top is strong, and that ripple effect is making itself obvious as we break down these bubble resumés. No matter how it looks, we’ll still be here breaking it all down, so with that let’s get to it.

For those new here stick with me, as I explain more about what I’m doing, vets can skip ahead with the buttons below.

So, I’m going to assign teams to 4 groups – Locks, On the Right Track, Teetering and Outside Looking In. Any team left out is not even on the radar. To avoid any confusion, let’s quickly define what I’m looking at for each.

“Locks” – Basically, these are teams I don’t see a world they don’t get in. I must admit I’m a below average gambler, see last year, so I am going to be quite stingy when it comes to assigning locks, ya better have the resumé to lose almost every game left and still get in.

“On the Right Track” – This group will range from teams who are on the precipice of getting locked down to teams who lie in the 6-7 seed range, as they’re comfortably in the field but a string of losses could send them spiraling toward the true bubble danger zone.

“Teetering” – This is the group of teams that are truly on the bubble, where every win and loss can shift where they stand and how comfortable they feel. They could range from the 8-9 seeds who look solid but are by no means safe, to the teams you find on the first 4 or next 4 out lists. 

“Outside Looking In” – These are the desperate teams, who are not close to in according to Bracket Matrix, but have enough opportunities to have a path to work themselves in.

I have provided below the Quadrant system to help contextualize what I’m referring to when discussing wins. Each conference has a table with the team’s resumé to reference at the beginning, for your own comparison, including the locks. Also worth mentioning, any of these teams can get their way in by winning the Conference tourney, I’m assuming with all of these blurbs they will need an at-large bid. For a breakdown of the available bubble spots see below, as we have 62 teams on the Watch, but many of those will be missing out. So without further ado, let’s get it. All info as of 2/2. Check out my current bracket projection here

Quadrant 1 (Q1)Quadrant 2 (Q2)Quadrant 3 (Q3)Quadrant 4 (Q4)
Home (1-30)Home (31-75)Home (76-160)Home (161-364)
Neutral (1-50)Neutral (51-100)Neutral (101-200)Neutral (201-364)
Away (1-75)Away (76-135)Away (136-240)Away (241-364)

Bubble Breakdown:

Total Bids: 68

1-bid conferences: 23

Locks: 10

Bids Left: 35

Bubble: 52


–ACC–

Locks: 

duke
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

UNC (23 NET)

unc

The Tar Heels played just once since we last met and they went on the road and stayed hot, taking care of GA Tech with ease. The story this entire season has been guard play, as we know they have one of the best front courts in the country with Veesar and Wilson. Trimble is steady now that he’s back from injury, but it’s been the play of Bogavac of late who has been a huge spark with 7 threes during this 3 game winning streak. Having a shooter to stretch the floor will be critical going forward, as the other 3 guards who have played have struggled to do so at times. This week is going to be a major test for the Heels though as they host rival Duke on Saturday after hosting Syracuse tonight. Gotta take care of business vs the Orange and then all eyes will be on Chapel Hill. I’m certainly not going to say this is a must win, but if they want to feel like a true contender nationally getting this one at home is the perfect way to make that statement. A 2-0 week will lead us to locking UNC I would think, but anything short of that will leave a trace of doubt going forward.

Virginia (18)

It was a tricky week for the Hoos as they looked to bounce back from a home loss to UNC. They traveled to Notre Dame and were fortunate to come away with a 2OT win over the Irish, then went to BC and came away with a close W over the bottom dwelling Eagles. Certainly not a week that will inspire much confidence, but from a resumé standpoint that’s 2 wins and more importantly they avoided adding a bad loss to the tally. I’m not sure if this is a bit of a regression to the mean after some hot play, but you it’s also hard to pick apart a team that is 18-3 and within that is an 8-3 record in Q1-2. They haven’t beaten anyone inside the top-20 aside from Louisville who was without Mikel Brown. However, they have 3 Q1(A) wins with Louisville, SMU and NC State on the road. Not sure many would realize that, but it’s one of the stronger resumé’s in the country, even though many probably have question marks about them after the last 3 games. We’re not going to see them tested for some time either, as they just get Pitt and Syracuse at home this week. 2 should be wins, so we’ll probably be close to locking next week if they handle their business. Will be one of the most interesting teams in the field if they maintain their winning ways.

Louisville (17)

louisville

I would call the last 7 days a bit of a roller-coaster for Louisville as they were feeling good with Mikel Brown back in the lineup and then absolutely got their doors blown in at Cameroon Indoor, losing by 31. That is a result that can alter seasons in a negative way, but credit to Pat Kelsey and co. as they bounced back and handled SMU at home on Saturday to steady the ship. Brown was really bad in the game @ Duke, resulting in his removal from the starting lineup vs SMU. Message received, as he came off the bench and scored 20 points in 29 minutes. One of those classic coaching moves where you send a message to a kid, and it appeared from his play that Brown understood what was expected and responded well. That’s great news for the Cards, as they have clearly been a very good team when he’s in the lineup and playing well. They have a couple of great opportunities to build on Saturday as they host Notre Dame and then go to a free-falling Wake Forest. Gotta have a 2-0 week to get the mojo back as they have a tough stretch coming up after that. In terms of resumé they still sit around the 6-7 seed line, pretty safely in but certainly don’t want to take on water at this stage.

Clemson (31)

clemson

Clemson might be the quietest power conference team that currently sits 8-1 in conference play. We’re talking teams like Michigan, Illinois, and Houston who all have just 1 loss in their respective conferences. Would you think of Clemson if that question were asked? I certainly wouldn’t expect many to, and yet here are the Tigers at 18-4 with an 8-4 Q1/2 record right now that is pretty strong. The knock as we said last week are the elite wins, but until those opportunities come all they can do is keep winning, just as they did this week winning their only game vs Pitt. That brings us to this upcoming week, as they head to California for some big time ACC matchups (still an absurd sentence to type). They get both Stanford and Cal on the road, who are both scratching and clawing down on the true bubble cut line so they are desperate for a big win against a team like Clemson. That is as perilous a trip as there is right now, going cross-country to play desperately wounded animals. If they can come away 2-0 from that we are going to be right on the doorstep of locking. Inversely, if they drop both and fall to just 1-5 in Q1 we have start having serious conversations about how far that 7-1 Q2 record is going to carry them. They will have more Q1 chances down the road, but the pressure will ramp up if they fail to capitalize this week.

SMU (34)

This is a tough one to have to report back on as SMU only had one game since we last met and it was a difficult trip to a desperate and very talented Louisville team. Based on that setup I’m sure you could guess how that went if you didn’t already know, pretty rough. They did jump out to an early lead though, showing what their talented backcourt was capable of in the first half. They managed just 27 points in the 2nd half though, losing the half 44-27 in route to a 14 point loss. Ended up ugly, but they showed early on who they can be at their best, but ultimately it’s another Q1 loss that drops them to 3-5 and just 6-6 overall in Q1/2. They’re not near the cut line yet, but they can’t afford to keep dropping Q1 games. Wins over UNC and Texas A&M are carrying them right now, but they could use more to truly feel safe. Fortunately, a top-25 NC State team comes to Dallas next, followed by a trip to Pitt. A 2-0 week would significantly quell any bubble concerns and buy some breathing room between them and the true depths of the bubble.

Teetering: 

NC State (27)

The Wolfpack have started to get things rolling here lately and it continued this week as they beat Syracuse and Wake by a combined 38 points this week, the latter of which was on the road. That gives them 4 straight wins since that embarrassing loss to GA Tech at home, a moment in the season that appears to be a rock bottom point that served as a wake up call. Derrion Williams has been back to what we expected him to be, scoring 43 points in their 2 wins, and with him rolling it’s hard not to take this NC State team seriously. That urge to do so will be tested over the coming weeks though, as their finishing stretch in the ACC is no joke, with 5 more Q1 chances at minimum. That gives them plenty of opportunity to improve that 2-6 Q1 record, which will be absolutely necessary if they want to have a chance on Selection Sunday. The trip to Dallas to face SMU is on deck, and represents a massively important game to both teams as both are looking for another feather in their cap. They then host VA Tech after that, so a split feels like the bare minimum if they want to stay on the right side of things firmly.

Virginia Tech (55)

I’m starting to have some real concerns about the Hokies actually making the dance after the missed opportunity vs Duke this weekend. That dropped them to just 1-5 in Q1, and while they’re 6-1 in Q2 it is almost never goes well on Selection Sunday for teams with just 1 Q1 win. That takes me to what is on the schedule the rest of the way. 5 of their final 8 games are road Q1 games, facing 5 of the top teams in the ACC with NC St/Clemson/Miami/UNC/Virginia on the docket. Sandwiched between those are home games that will be just Q3 must-wins. I don’t see a world they get in if they go 0-5 in those games, as a team that is just 1-10 has almost no chance. So, in order to find a way in, they need to win at minimum one of those 5 road games, with 2 really being the number I’m targeting to feel confident. That would leave them 3-8 in Q1 to go with their 6-1 in Q2, that’s a tourney team. 2-9 and 6-1, that’s fringe, and will be dependent on what the rest of the bubble does. It’s rare you can see the path so clearly for a team, but with 8 to play and such a contrast in difficulty with their games, it’s fairly simple. Go 2-3 on the road down the stretch and handle business at home and they’re in. It begins this week with their lone game a trip to NC State. Whether they know it or not, it’s nut cutting time for the Hokies.

Cal (51)

Just when I was ready to write Cal off after they went and lost to Florida St, they bounced back by beating Miami on the road to keep my hope in them alive. That gave them their 3rd Q1 win, making this a very tricky resumé to figure out as they have some big time wins but also just a 1-2 record in Q2 after that loss to the Seminoles. The other part of this is how favorable the schedule is down the stretch, so getting through this week at 1-1 minimum was my requirement. Now they look ahead with just 4 of 9 on the road, all against bottom half of the league teams. In all, of the 9 games remaining only 2 are Q1 so they are going to be able to go on a run and win a lot of games, and they’ll have to if they want to stay relevant. Their biggest issue is going to be that 1-2 Q2 record and their abysmal SOS number. They need to flip that above .500 to feel comfortable. They will get their chances, with a home game vs Clemson this week possibly 1 of them as the Tigers are right on the cut line of 30th in NET. They host GA Tech prior, a can’t lose game followed by a massive opportunity. This could be a major swing week, or one that puts major pressure on the rest of the season.

Miami (FL) (38)

The Canes have really put themselves in a tough spot after letting one slip away at home to Cal on Saturday. They picked up a good win earlier in the week vs Stanford and lead late vs Cal. It fell apart but in the end they had 2 chances down 1 after Cal missed some FT’s and still weren’t able to grab the lead back in the closing seconds. That loss dropped them to just 4-4 in Q1/2. 8 total games in those two quadrants is fairly unfathomable for a Power Conference team right now and for that reason they are not in my field right now (bracket matrix disagrees, but barely). Regardless of where you think they should fall, it certainly isn’t in a secure place right now, and how could it be when their best win is akin to a mid-major team being @ Wake Forest (68). So while their 17-5 record looks shiny on the surface, when you dig a little deeper there is not much substance here when it comes to the resumé. They are a prime case of needing to be big game hunting the rest of the way as they desperately need wins against good teams to actually have an at-large case. They are going to have their chances with 5 more Q1 chances yet to come, but it’s going to be a bit as this week they only have a trip to lowly BC on deck. That is a can’t-lose if they don’t want to fall even more off the pace, so hopefully we’re coming to you next week with optimism as they host UNC and go to NC State.

Outside Looking In:

Stanford (78)

I am going to officially declare Stanford in a free fall right now as they’ve lost 4 in a row and 5 of 6 overall after starting the season 13-3. We mentioned the loss of Chisom Okpara last week, and unfortunately it appears the lone win without him over UNC is going to be the exception not the rule going forward, as they are now 1-4 without him. Ebuka Okorie continues to carry the load, but without having the Robin to his Batman they just haven’t been able to hang. This week it was losses to Miami and Florida St, which dropped them to 6-5 in Q1/2, and while that sounds pretty good, we have to remember they are working against 3 losses in Q3. While I still think the committee will be willing to look past early season bad losses if good wins come in bunches afterwards, they have to be able to stop the bleeding to keep that scenario alive. They get to return home this week with a prime opportunity up next with Clemson coming to town. I’m willing to say that’s a must-win, and while the scenarios are likely still out there even with a loss, you can’t discount the mental toll 5 losses in a row would take. I think if we want to have a realistic path forward that doesn’t include major upsets on the road, we need a 2-0 week from the Cardinal this week. Beat Clemson, then slap around GA Tech and the train will be back on the tracks. Anything less than that and we’re looking at a disaster scenario.


–Big Ten–

Locks:

michigan
Proj. 1
nebraska
Proj. 2
illinois
Pr. 2
sparty
Proj. 3

On the Right Track:

Purdue (8)

purdue-4

We may have seen a Purdue team bottom out this past week as they lost their 3rd in a row, this time to rival Indiana on the road. It felt like the sky was falling if you were plugged into the Boilermaker fanbase, but the Boilers bounced back by dropping the hammer on Maryland in a 30 point rout to settle everyone down. The biggest takeaway from the big win was seeing Fletcher Loyer return to form, as the sharpshooter had been receiving most of the heat during the rough stretch as he went 4-17 from 3. On Sunday he knocked down 7 threes on 10 attempts, and if that is him breaking out of his slump then we may really have this team back to it’s top form. From a resumé perspective it’s important to point out that every game matters equally, so while the 3 in a row seemed bleak, overall they are still entering the week 6-4 in Q1 which has them still solidly on the 3 line right now. They have a long break as they don’t play again until Saturday, with another easy one on deck with a wounded Oregon coming to West Lafayette. Ideally, we’re coming to you next week with Purdue still sitting at 8-4 in Q1/2 and staring down the barrel of road trips to Iowa and Nebraska. That’s where we’re going to find out how they’ve truly bounced back from the low point.

Iowa (20)

The Hawkeyes continued to roll this week as they pulled off a wild victory over USC in the dying moments at home and then went to Eugene and smacked around Oregon. They have perfectly embodied new HC Ben McCollum’s style as they play at a snails pace and just try to out execute you in the halfcourt. That style is working, and with Bennett Stirtz leading the way they are in pretty good shape to make the tourney in year 1. The only thing they’re missing right now to feel extra secure are the Q1 wins, as they just have the 1 @ Indiana to their name. Overall they are 6-5 in Q1/2 but to truly feel safe come Selection Sunday they are going to want to beef that Q1 win total up no doubt. This week presents a giant opportunity as they head to a feisty Washington team, looking for a big time win in their own right, so finding a way to win that would go a long way. A loss would push them closer to the cut line, despite being 20th in the NET, as they could find themselves in bigger trouble sporting just 1 high quality win. They host Northwestern after that, so 1-1 minimum to keep the Hawkeyes from the true danger zone, but they’re going to have bigger chances down the road, so no need to panic if they do fall in Seattle.

Teetering: 

Wisconsin (41)

wisconsin

The Badgers certainly played with their food this week as they had what looked on paper like 2 fairly simple home games but right out the gates they fell down 20 to Minnesota. They battled back and pulled out a victory, riding the backs of John Blackwell and Nick Boyd who both scored over 20. They handled Ohio St a little easier, and it was that same duo carrying the load, but that Minnesota game had to have been a red flag for that locker room as you simply can’t come out that flat in Conference play, they got lucky to squeak that one out. Right now they are still being buoyed by that road win over Michigan, which continues to be the best win on the Watch, but sitting at just 1 Q1 win is going to grow increasingly concerning as other teams start to pass them in that win total. The rest of the resumé is strong, with a 6-1 Q2 record really jumping out, but I’m looking for this group to add a key win or 2 down the stretch before I feel overly confident. This week they have a big test in that regard, as they play just once @ Indiana. The Hoosiers are getting hot, but are still desperate to win games and climb into the field, so that’s a tough one that could drop them to 1-6 in Q1. If that happens, pressure will be mounting as we get deeper into February.

USC (48)

What a wild week for the Trojans as they started off the week with an absolutely bonkers game @ Iowa in which they led at halftime, got down by as much as 17 in the 2nd half, only to roar all the way back to take a late lead with 8 seconds left. They proceeded to lose that one, in spite of the fact Kam Woods had 33 points, more than his 23 total points on the season! Insanely bizarre game that ultimately just stacked up another Q1 loss for the Muss Bus. They returned home and battled a feisty Rutgers team and picked up a win they had to have as they continue to try and steady the ship in Big 10 play. 3 of their 4 Big 10 wins right now are over Minnesota/Maryland/Rutgers, so it hasn’t exactly been a success so far in January, but they’re holding on to some good wins in the non-con to stay afloat. This week is an important week, not because it presents golden opportunities but it gives them 2 games they really should win if they are who they think they are. First they host a white hot Indiana team, and then they go to Penn St. The Hoosiers have won multiple in a row but are playing their 2nd game in LA so I think that favors the Trojans on Tuesday night. Then is the cross-country trip to Penn St, who is a sleeping giant, with emphasis on the sleeping. They have only won 1 Big 10 game, so calling them that seems ridiculous, but they have played Michigan St, Michigan, Purdue, Illinois and Ohio St all to single digit games. They are not a team you want to take lightly, even at 1-10 in league play. An 0-2 week would be catastrophic, and even 1-1 would be disappointing and likely drop them square into the cut line of the bubble.

UCLA (44)

ucla

I honestly don’t know what to make of this UCLA team as they seemingly had it rolling as they knocked off Oregon in Eugene to make it 5 wins out of their last 6 games. Then they went back to Westwood and lost a 2 OT thriller to IU. Should we be disappointed? I’m not sure, because that one could have easily gone the other way multiple times and we’d be sitting here talking about the Bruins winning 6 of 7. Clear eyes tell us it’s just a blip, and with Donovan Dent continuing his strong play of late I do think they’ve still rounded that corner and should be a solid tourney team come Selection Sunday. However, they still have work to do, and that loss to IU was a resumé setback as they fell to just 5-7 overall in Q1/2 with just 2 Q2 wins. Work yet to be done to say the least and they head into this week with 2 very winnable home games on deck. Only one of them will carry much weight as they host Rutgers first but the matchup with Washington is a chance to improve the Q2 record. Ultimately, every win counts right now, as even a Q3/4 win is at least avoiding adding a black stain to the resumé.

Indiana (30)

indiana

As much as I hate to type this, noo team on the Watch had a better week than the Indiana Hoosiers. They first knocked off Purdue at home to notch an all-important Q1 win and then flew out to LA and followed that up with a Q1 win @ UCLA in 2 OT. The story of the improved play has to begin and end with the emergence of Nick Dorn, who has been on fire from beyond the arc making 16 three balls during this 3 game winning streak. That has catapulted them into as high as the First Four in Dayton as they now sit 3-7 in Q1/2 after barely being in the discussion at just 1-7 last week. The home win over Purdue gives them the signature Q1(A) win we’re always looking for as well, so that is going to set them apart from some of the other close bubble teams they’re jockeying for position with. They stay out in LA to begin the week as they play USC, another Q1 chance and then come home to face Wisconsin. The game against the Badgers is very important because that Q2 record sitting at just 1-1 is a real weak point. Picking up that win, even if they lose to the Trojans, will be huge as they try and salvage their at-large hopes. Obviously, staying hot and going 2-0 would do wonders, but realistically splitting that trip to LA is a huge win and then holding serve at home keeps this thing heading in the right direction.

Ohio St (40) 

buckeyes

Ohio St didn’t really do anything to alter their position on the bubble this past week as they took care of business against Penn St at home and then lost to Wisconsin in Madison. That loss was the epitome of their season as they continue to not be able to get stops against high level competition, as they now sit 77th in Def efficiency and 199th in 2-point FG% allowed. So, if anything, their case got a little weaker as they fell to 1-6 in Q1 and just 4-7 in Q1/2 overall. They are probably being better received than they should be at this point because right now the resumé is a lot closer to that of a mid-major than a power conference team when you’re looking at the top wins. They have a road win over Northwestern who is barely clinging to top-75 and then just one top-50 win at home vs UCLA. That is very weak, so there is mounting pressure on the Buckeyes to find a big time win to bring to the table on Selection Sunday. This week they go to Maryland, one you have to win and won’t do much but stain your resumé if you lose, and then they host rival Michigan. That’s one you have to have circled as they played the Wolverines close in Ann Arbor so adding an elite win like that is exactly what they need. A loss leaves us in the exact same situation.

Outside Looking In:

Washington (47)

The Huskies are the first new addition to the Watch this week as I dug a bit more into their current resumé and their remaining schedule and a glimmer of hope was spotted. Right now they are decently far out of the conversation at just 12-10, but the win @ Northwestern this weekend gave them a fighting chance as they moved to 5-10 in Q1/2. They have very strong SOS numbers and frankly when you look outside of Q1(A) they’re 12-4, which should be a woah moment. We’re comparing them to teams who haven’t even played a Q1(A) game much less won one, so going 0-6 there shouldn’t be a disqualifier. What they have in front of them is the chance to rip off a lot of wins in a row, as the final 7 games are all very winnable, with only 3 road trips to Rutgers, Maryland and Oregon to come. They would get Penn St/Minnesota at home, there’s 5 wins getting them to 17 total, and then host Wisconsin and USC to push them to 19 potentially, adding 2 more Q2 wins. For those savvy fans out there, I’m intentionally leaving out 2 games, as there are 9 to play. Those are both this week. My path to a Washington Huskies at-large ticket getting punched has have a 1-1 split this week I believe, as they host Iowa and then go to UCLA. I think they need to get a 3rd Q1 win to have a chance, and these are there final 2 before a potential opportunity in the Big 10 tourney. So, to recap, they need to go 8-1 over their final 9 games, and while that sounds like a tall mountain to clime, 5 of those are against the bottom-6 teams in the conference. Season comes down to winning 3 out of 4 vs Iowa/USC/UCLA/Wisconsin, 3 of which are in your home building. It’s a daunting task sure, but Danny Sprinkle if you’re reading this I see the path my friend. It all hinges on this week though, gotta find a way to win a ballgame.


–Big 12–

Locks: 

arizona
Proj. 1
iowast
Proj. 2
houston
Proj. 2

On the Right Track:

Kansas (14)

kansas

While the answer to our all important Darryn Peterson question was not really answered on Saturday, his return for the 1st half against BYU exemplified why it’s so important. He was absurdly good, and helped the Jayhawks build a 20 point halftime lead. They unfortunately blew that lead after he was forced to exit once again with “cramps” in his legs early in the 2nd half. In the end, they were able to hold on and get a huge W over the Cougars at home, but it is clear how high their ceiling can be if this kid can find a way through whatever it is that’s preventing him from playing a full game. They have a quick turnaround with another monster matchup as they head to Lubbock to face a Tech team coming off a loss tonight. That’s followed by an easy one at home vs Utah, so 1-1 on the week should be the bare minimum, with a chance to make a major statement if they can take down the Red Raiders. As of now, they sit pretty firmly on the 4 line as they have 4 Q1 wins and are 11-5 overall in Q1/2. If they can continue to build on their current 5 game winning streak they will keep on flying up the seed list as they continue to emerge as a real threat nationally.

Texas Tech (19)

tx tech

Texas Tech has a fantastic resumé right now, with 3 elite wins over Duke/Houston/BYU, but they did take a hit when they went to Orlando on Saturday and lost to UCF. The issue in their losses has been defense and that cropped up once again as they let UCF score 88 points on just 69 possessions. That on top of losing the possession battle by 16 and you have a pretty clear picture as to why they lost. Ultimately all that means is they dropped from a potential 3 seed down to the 4 line, but they have an immediate chance to bounce back as they welcome Kansas to their home building. Picking up yet another Q1 win to get them up to 5 total would get us very close to locking this up, especially if they go to Morgantown later in the week and handle West Virginia. A loss in either one of those would keep them below .500 in Q1, and while I can’t really imagine a team with 5 Q1 wins missing out, we’re always one injury or catastrophic collapse from it at least being interesting come Selection Sunday. No matter the stakes, it is going to be must-watch college hoops tonight in Lubbock when the Jayhawks come to town.

BYU (15)

byu

You certainly have to have a few more questions about this BYU team after the last couple of weeks have seen them lost to Texas Tech, Arizona and most recently Kansas. They battle back well against both Arizona and Kansas this week, but ultimately it goes down as an 0-2 week in Q1, as close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. The concern you start to have is they haven’t beaten an elite team, going 0-4 against top-30 opponents. They still have the 4 Q1 wins, but right now you could very fairly call them a bit of a paper tiger, even though they have AJ Dybantsa and plenty of talent around him. On paper, they should be able to compete with the top teams in the sport, but we just haven’t seen them put it together for a full 40 minutes and get it done. Lucky for them, they’ll get 2 more chances this week as the gauntlet that is this year’s Big 12 keeps on swinging, as they head to Oklahoma St and then host Houston. A 2-0 week would shut up all the people who may be doubting this group right now, as beating this year’s Houston team is no easy feat, and exactly the type of win they need to cement themselves at the top of the sport.

UCF (37)

ucf

The win on Saturday for the Knights has put this UCF team in prime position to get back to the dance for the first time since 2019 as they now have 3 very solid wins, at home vs Kansas/Texas Tech and @ Texas A&M. Two of those are good for Q1(A) status and they have 0 losses outside of Q1 so it’s squeaky clean right now and very solid at the top end. The story here continues to be Themus Fulks who is now on his 4th school in 5 years but having a career year after bouncing around the mid-major ranks. He had 21 points and 7 assists in the win over Tech as he continues to make a surprise case for an All-Conference bid. All of this positivity could come crashing down though as this week presents 2 tough road challenges, as they head to Houston and then Cincy. Now, one of those is not quite like the other, but still Cincy is very good defensively and has won their last 3 home games, including an upset of Iowa St. Lose both of those games and we’re sliding the Knights back to somewhat rocky ground at just 3-6 in Q1, but I still look at the top flight wins and can’t see them dropping too far down the seed list as they are in the 6-7 range right now. A truly unbelievable season thus far, and honestly just finding a way to go 1-1 this week would be enough to keep this thing right on track.

Teetering: N/A

Outside Looking In:

TCU (54)

What a disappointing week for the Horned Frogs as they fought tooth and nail at home to try and steal one from Houston, ultimately coming up short, and then went out to Colorado and got absolutely boat raced. Jamie Dixon has to be upset with the effort on Sunday, as the team that went nose to nose with Houston should not be getting beat by 26 vs Colorado, I don’t care where it’s played. The effort simply wasn’t there, and frankly they were beat from pillar to post and should be embarrassed by that effort. Hopefully that is a moment they can learn from and not let it be the unraveling, and they’re lucky enough to not play again until Saturday when they host K-State. That’s a must-win at this stage, especially after this recent performance you have to do something to get the belief back. They still have those wins over Florida/Wisconsin/Baylor away from home, but they’re also working against a Q3 and 4 loss so it’s going to take more than just 5-7 in Q1/2 to get themselves in position for an at-large. They slid way back this week, but there’s still 9 Big 12 games on the schedule, with plenty of chances to turn this thing around. Just have to get back rolling.

Oklahoma St (67)

Oklahoma St did what they had to do in beating Utah to continue lingering around in the conversation, but without that signature Q1 win (0-4) they are still a decent ways out of this thing. They do have a couple of solid wins over UCF and Texas A&M, but neither of those teams are top-30 and their best win away from home is Grand Canyon, with their best road win being the one they just picked up @ Utah. Not a strong case that they’re making, especially considering the non-con SOS is an abysmal 271st. That all would take a dramatic turn if they could pick off BYU at home this week, or beat Arizona in their building but I don’t think we even need to consider that happening at this point. BYU has to be the target, but unfortunately the Cougars are going to be hungry to get back in the win column after dropping 2 straight to Arizona and Kansas last week. Not a great time to face them, you’d much rather face a Cougar who’s fat and happy than hungry and desperate. Either way, the Pokes should be even more desperate, as falling to 0-5 with a trip to Zona likely sending them to 0-6 in Q1 is just going to see them fade further into the darkness.

Baylor (56)

The Baylor Bears have a pulse! Just as I was about to prepare the casket and inform the families, Baylor went into Morgantown and knocked off West Virginia to add another Q1 victory and end their 4 game losing streak. It’s still only 2 wins in their last 9 games, but if only temporarily, they have slowed the bleeding. Cam Carr and Obi Agbim lead the way offensively, but it was the defensive effort that shocked me the most as they had been dreadful on that end but held WVU to just 53 points. That of course was on the heels of the loss @ Cincy earlier in the week, so in total it was just a 1-1 split on the road, but that’s enough to keep them on the Watch a bit longer as they still do sport a 5-9 record in Q1/2. The SOS numbers are very strong, and the 3 Q1 wins stand out in this bubble environment. Granted, none of them are over top-40 opponents, but we’re not talking about a team that’s in the field, merely just hanging around and needing to go on a run. They have another must-win with Colorado coming to Waco and then they have a near impossible task as they go to Iowa St. We’re just looking for a 1-1 week to stay alive.

West Virginia (66)

The Mountaineers hopes for an at-large are now on life support, and honestly if they weren’t in the Big 12 with all of these opportunities ahead of them, I would have already pulled the plug. What I wanted to see from them this week was to handle their business at home, and they did that early in the week beating K-State. Then they let a reeling Baylor team walk into Morgantown and take their lunch money. Not good enough, and frankly at 2-8 in Q1/2 it’s kind of an abomination they are on the Watch at all, but that is the nature of the bubble this year. It could just be that the win over Kansas was just fool’s gold, but when you flash that kind of ability you get a longer leash around here. This week they go to Cincy and then host Texas Tech. You just have to win both right now if you’re the Mountaineers. There are too many teams in the mid-major ranks carrying strong Q2-4 records to stick around the conversation if you’re not cashing in on these opportunities.


–Big East–

Locks:

uconn
Proj. 1

On the Right Track:

St. John’s (24)

st john's

The Johnnies could very well be hitting their stride, as the recent pounding of Butler at home gave them their 7th win in a row. As we discussed last week, it was a rocky road out of the gates but it seems Pitino has his tight 8 man rotation pretty much nailed down as we steamroll into February. Dillon Mitchell has been the story of late, exemplified by his 14 pts, 13 rebs and 4 asts the other night vs Butler. If he is putting up that stat line in the front court next to Zuby Ejiofor all of a sudden this becomes a scary dominant group up front. This week presents the ultimate test in the Big East though as they host UConn. That is the true measuring stick as the Huskies have just 1 loss on the season, to undefeated Arizona, so if St. John’s can knock off Hurley and co. that will be the indicator that they must be taken serious nationally. What they can’t allow to happen is to be looking too far ahead the way I am, as they still have to go to DePaul Tuesday night before the UConn game. St. John’s is on a great track, and a 2-0 week would put them on firm ground for the dance. There’s that chance though they get caught with their pants down and lose to DePaul and then can’t get it done against UConn. Then we’re looking at a trip down to the muddy bubble waters.

Villanova (33)

Unfortunately for Nova weeks like these are actually not great as teams all around them are picking up impactful wins while they simply beat Providence at home to stand pat at just 5-5 in Q1/2. They also have the issue of not having a single win over teams in the top-40 of the NET, so while they have a great record at 16-5 overall, it is somewhat reminiscent of those weak ACC or the MWC resumé’s we’re seeing. It doesn’t get much better this week unfortunately, as they host Seton Hall and then go to Georgetown. Those aren’t easy games by any means, but they are merely Q2 games that at this point they have to have but don’t address the key hole in their resumé. February 21st is going to be the date we have circled for Nova, as if they can avoid the land mines prior to that point then a win in the rematch with UConn would be exactly what the doctor ordered and make me feel very good about their case. There is a lot of work to be done prior to that point, so we’ll look for a 2-0 week that would boost them to 7-5 in Q1/2, keeping the wolves at bay as try and keep that gap between them and the true cut line.

Teetering:

Seton Hall (49)

You have to consider this week for Seton Hall as big as any that they’ve had all season, as they came into the week absolutely reeling after losing 4 in a row. They were able to bounce back with 2 massive wins at home, and while they were merely Q3 wins over bottom dwellers in the conference, it had to be a relief to get back in the W column. 5’10” guard Budd Clark was the story in the 2 wins as he had a combined 43 points, 10 rebounds 10 assists and 6 steals in the 2 games. If they get that level of Adam Clark the rest of the way things will be looking up in Jersey as they are desperate for a consistent scorer to go with their lockdown defense. Now, all of this positivity is about to be put to the test as they hit the road this week, playing Nova and Creighton. Those are not going to be easy, but they really need to find a way to steal one of those to not fall further out of this thing. The trip to Creighton is obviously going to be more attainable, and while it may end up being just a Q2 victory they can’t afford to drop a 4th Q2 game if that’s where Creighton is going to fall. Right now, they’re out, so while it seems like asking a lot the Big East isn’t offering a lot of opportunities, so the Pirates need to start capitalizing before it’s too little too late. After this, it’s really only St John’s/UConn. Now is the time to strike.

Outside Looking In:

Butler (64)

Well, if last week Butler’s at-large hopes were hanging on to the edge of a cliff, they just lost their grip with one hand and are down to one singular hand holding on for dear life. That is thanks to a home loss to Georgetown which saw them miss their final 14 shots from the field. That took their ugly 4-8 Q1/2 record and added a Q3 loss to the mix. I know that this thing is bleak and they are probably the farthest team out of it on the watch, but my hometown small college still has a viable path and damnit I’m going to hold on to it. They have 2 must-win road games this week as they head to Providence and Marquette. Those are not easy trips, but if you want to make the tournament those are simply games you have to win. They won’t even add much to the resumé, but quietly they could improve their Q2 record to 4-4 which would bring them one step closer to clawing their way back into the conversation. After that they host UConn and Seton Hall. This is a 4 game stretch where they have to be playing like their lives depend on it, and nothing short of 3-1 will do. If they can manage that, they could jump to 7-9 in Q1/2 with 5 games to play. That’s the short terms path to staying alive right now. Do I have confidence? How could you after the loss to G’Town, but I have hope and that’s what we’re here to provide in bunches.


–SEC–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track:

Vanderbilt (13)

For those that had major questions about this Vandy team I think you can go ahead and take a seat and consider them answered after they completely undressed Kentucky in Nashville. That 25 point drubbing was about all I needed to see to say, okay, I think they’re going to be just fine. They did it without Duke Miles as well, with Tyler Tanner continuing to shine as he took on more of the load in the back court as he had 19 against UK and then 24 later in the week in their win over Ole Miss. That’s now 3 W’s in a row after that little slip in January that saw them lose 3 straight, so a very nice bounce back and what looks to be a rock solid resumé forming. They still have just 5 Q1 wins, only one of which is Q1(A) and only 2 of those being top-30 opponents though, so a collapse would still make this interesting. I don’t think it’s going to happen, but again I’m trying to keep all scenarios alive, not just the one’s I believe to be likely. This week may be enough to move them to locking as they just host Oklahoma. The Sooners play everyone tough and then lose late, so as long as the Dores at least continue that trend we’ll see them move to an impressive 12-3 in Q1/2. Certainly enough to lock with 20 wins, even with a tough homestretch still to come. A loss brings back the doubters, but that would be the most insane results of the season, so I’m not betting on it.

Florida (12)

florida

Last week I was pretty cloudy when it came to my opinion on the Gators, as they were on such a roll prior to losing at home to Auburn. That one stopped me in my tracks, a proverbial wrench in the bike tire. However, this week was a clarifying showing as they went to S. Carolina and won by a staggering 47 points and then returned home to blowout Bama by 23. Quite the response, and it has sent them surging up to 7th in Kenpom. They are now 7-1 in their last 8 games, with the computers looking at them as the best team in the SEC right now. All of that said they are still only around the 4-5 seed range when it comes to a resumé so they either are going to be a nightmare for a 1 seed to see in their region or maybe they’ll climb up if they continue to dominate SEC teams. They will get a chance to improve on their 4-6 Q1 record this week as they head to Texas A&M, who is shockingly pacing the SEC right now at 7-1. A monster showdown in College Station as 1st and 2nd place in the league go toe-to-toe with 1st place on the line.

Arkansas (23)

I was really starting to buy in on this young Arkansas team, especially after they went to Oklahoma in a trap spot leading up to the Kentucky game and pulled off a big win. That showed a maturity not often seen in college, but they then turned around and lost their composure in the UK game and showed that youth as they fell to Kentucky in a contentious and sloppy game in Fayetteville. That loss dropped them down to 4-6 in Q1 right as they started surging up the seed list, and they now sit somewhere around the 5 seed line. They still have a ton of promise, but their lack of ability on defense was exposed again in that UK game and it’s just too much for their young FR guard duo to overcome at times. They have a nice break before they head to the punching bag of the conference in Mississippi St, so that break mixed with an easier game represents a good opportunity to settle back down and bounce back. In due time it certainly feels like we’ll be able to lock these Razorbacks in, but for now we will want to see that 7-6 overall record in Q1/2 climb up as it really is being carried by the 2 Q1(A) wins over Vandy/Texas Tech.

Alabama (22)

Alabama is taking on water right now as Nate Oats seems to be losing control of this thing. Maybe I’m being a bit hyperbolic, as they did beat the brakes off of Mizzou earlier in the week, but I can’t seem to shake that blowout loss at the hands of Florida Sunday. That was an ugly loss that you just aren’t used to seeing an Alabama team take under Oats. They almost always can go blow for blow with teams, even if that means losing 95-90 they are always still in the game. Losing 100-77 is not the norm, so while they’re still in a fine position in terms of getting into the dance at 9-7 in Q1/2, it’s only sitting at 3-6 in Q1. In other years that could be cause for concern, but in a year like this where those last 8-10 teams getting in aren’t anywhere close to the wins of the Tide I’m not worried about them getting in. My doubt is about what they do once they’re there, but that’s for another series on this site, here we’re talking resumé and they do have wins over Illinois/St. John’s away from home and UK at home. Those will continue to buoy them even if they keep dropping Q1 games, but eventually if they fall to like 3-11 what does that look like? I don’t think it’ll get that bad, but they have lost 3 straight Q1 games with another Q2 loss sprinkled in there. Needless to say, they need to turn it around, and they’ll have chances to do so this week as they host A&M and then go to rival Auburn. 2 more losses and we may have to hit the panic button on the Tide.

Tennessee (21)

vols

Uh ohhhhh has Rick Barnes finally gotten this team clicking as we steamroll into February? My eyes tell me they’ve turned a corner recently as they have picked up 3 straight wins, all of which are Q1 right now. This week it was a trip to Georgia that they pulled out an OT W after trailing by 6 at halftime and then they came home to beat Auburn. Freshmen sensation Nate Ament seems to be hitting his stride as he has averaged 23 ppg during this little streak. While they still aren’t the same scary team defensively we’ve seen under Barnes, they’re capable and tough on the glass as always, ranking #1 in offensive rebound rate. That’s been the formula, get enough stops and be absolute terrors on the glass, so even when shots aren’t falling they’re getting 2nd and 3rd chances. In terms of resumé they have jumped up to 5-6 in Q1 after being just 2-6 a couple of weeks ago, quite the rise and quite the jump from fringe bubble team to solidly in the field right now. This week they should stay hot in the short term as they host Ole Miss but then they head to rival Kentucky. They let the Wildcats come to Knoxville and steal one, so you know revenge is on their mind, making that one must-watch on Saturday.

Kentucky (28)

kentucky

This has to be one of the more trying seasons on the collective heart of BBN in a long time, as this team will have lows that drop you to the depths of the Earth, only to bounce back and deliver the highest of highs a regular season game can offer. What I’m talking about is UK going into Fayetteville and knocking off former HC John Calipari in his new home. Whether or not UK fans are happy with him, they certainly all would admit that win fired them up. Not only that, the timing of it being on the heels of another embarrassing effort @ Vandy had to bring back some hope for the season. It was looking gloomy once again after that 25 point drubbing in Nashville, at the hands of Vandy no less, so I’m here to acknowledge the roller coaster BBN is on right now and offer absolutely zero sympathy, you have had your fun, welcome to normalcy. Back to the macro point though here as the resumé got far better with that win bringing them to 5-6 in Q1. They still have that pedestrian 1-1 record sitting in Q2, but if they can pile up a few more wins over there those 3 Q1(A) wins inside Q1 are going to be perfectly enough to make this conversation more about how high they can go vs if they get in. This week they host Oklahoma and then Tennessee, the latter of which will have the nation’s attention as the Vols look for revenge. The Cats have to at bare minimum beat the Sooners at home, but you know they want that season sweep of the Vols. Pick that up, and we’ll be racing to lock territory after having major question marks about UK just a few weeks ago.

Auburn (29)

auburn

Auburn has played the toughest schedule in the country so far according to the NET, so we have to keep that in mind as we’re looking at a team sitting on 8 losses right now. Yes, that is much higher than some of the teams I have teetering, but they’ve played 8 Q1(A) games for crying out loud, we have to credit them for winning 2 of those at least. You take out that 2-6 record in Q1(A) and you’re looking at a 12-2 team outside of that. There are teams who have played 0 or 1 or 2 of those games total and hardly have 2 wins there. That is why Auburn is safe, and why we won’t be getting negative around here after they dropped on in Knoxville this week. Tough place to play and a really good team, and it came on the heels of a nice home win over a desperate Texas team so they’re still rolling as far as I’m concerned. They have a nice break and then they host in-state rival Bama who is licking their wounds after a beat down @ Florida. Bama gets a chance to get right prior, but still this is a massive chance to knock off your rival and swing positioning with them potentially as they would rise to 5-7 in Q1 alone. They’re in the midst of a brutal stretch, with 3 more Q1 games coming make it 6 out of 7 in that category. Make it out alive and it eases up with some of the bottom dwellers in this conference.

Teetering:

Texas A&M (35)

a&m

The Aggies continued their winning ways this week as they went to Georgia and won comfortably to move to 7-1 now in conference play. They are now in a similar category as Clemson as they quietly are sitting in a power conference with just 1 loss, and crazily are still in the teetering category. Allow me to explain. While they do have 7 SEC wins, they had little to no meat on the non-conference bone, as their best win was a Q2 road win over Pitt (114th). So, they were starting way behind the 8 ball, and in total have only added 3 Q1 wins during this run in the SEC. Play time is over though as this week begins the ramp up in competition as they first head to Alabama and then host a hot Florida team. Those are both Q1(A) games right now so finding a way to even split those games is going to be both challenging and honestly paramount to avoid slipping down into more perilous territory. Teams have gotten hammered over the past few years for playing weak non-con schedules, especially those in the bottom half of the seed list, so the Aggies don’t want to be anywhere close to the cut line as that could be a hit that sinks them. I don’t see them there currently, but they have some tough tests the rest of the way. Have to capitalize on 1 or 2 more chances to really feel safe.

Georgia (36)

The Dawgs are starting to lose their grip on this thing as they have now lost 3 in a row to fall down the seed list into real dangerous territory. The OT loss to Tennessee is going to haunt them as they had chances to win it and just couldn’t get it done. That disappointment and fatigue may have carried over into their next one as they lost another home tilt vs A&M to fall to 3-4 in Q1. They do have the benefit of being 7-4 overall in Q1/2 which is a pretty strong record, it’s just at the top end they’re lacking that elite Q1(A) win and they also have that Q3 loss at home to Ole Miss hanging out there. In all 5 losses they’ve given up over 85 points, so that’s clearly a weak point, and while they play one of the fastest tempos in the Country 60th in Def efficiency is clearly a weak point. That will have to be the focus, but overall they’re still in a decent position to get into the field again, it’s just going to have to include more tough wins as the SEC is brutal once again this year. They only play once this week but it’s another Q1 chance as they head to LSU. The Tigers are down pretty bad at just 2-7 in SEC play, so that is one you absolutely have to have or else that would be 4 losses in a row and a potential free fall diagnosis will be in order. Stop the bleeding and keep it moving.

Texas (39)

texas

The Longhorns stay alive as they were able to go to Norman in part 1 of the Red River Shootout and got a big Q2 win after falling @ Auburn earlier in the week. Dailyn Swain continues to be a revelation as he put up 18/10/6 in the win over the Sooners, helping the Longhorns keep pace with the other bubble teams, and even pass a few who didn’t capitalize. We’re going to quickly turn our eyes forward for this group as the upcoming stretch feels as important as it is unremarkable. They host S. Carolina and Ole Miss this week, 2 games I’m calling can’t lose as they both won’t even qualify as Q2. They can’t afford to take on water at this point with Q3 losses. They then go to Mizzou who is very beatable and then host LSU. This next 4 game stretch at minimum has to be a 3-1 stretch Texas to keep try and fight there way onto the right side of things. As of writing this, they’re the first team out per Bracket Matrix. I have them in, some don’t. It’s that close right now. Every game is important right now, even if it’s just to avoid a disastrous loss. They end with a brutal 4 of 5 Q1 stretch, so stacking up some wins over the next 2 weeks is as important to this team as any team fighting on the bubble, because if you can’t do it now, are you really going to do it against Arkansas, A&M, Georgia and Florida?

Outside Looking In:

Missouri (70)

Mizzou pretty much did exactly what we thought they would do this week, as they went to Tuscaloosa and got blown out and then came back to Columbia and beat Mississippi St. Didn’t really do much for them as they just dropped another Q1 game and frankly fell a bit further out of it if anything at all. This is a gross resumé to try and place because they have 3 fantastic wins over Florida/UK/Auburn, but that 0-3 record is alarming and has to be a nail in their coffin if the season ended today. We have teams who have fewer big time wins but I would think the committee would look at the overall 3-7 record in Q1/2 and see a very inconsistent team that got hot a couple of times, not really a season worth rewarding right now. The good news is there is time to improve that record, and getting it to at least 2-3 or 3-3 feels necessary to getting fully back into the conversation. A great first step in doing that would be going to S. Carolina and winning. Actually, I’m saying it’s a can’t-lose game for the Tigers as they absolutely can’t afford to drop to 0-4 in Q2. Light the resumé on fire if that happens. You jump to 1-3 there and you have life.


–Mountain West–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Utah St (26)

utahst

Utah St keeps on trending in the right direction as they won a very important matchup against San Diego St on Saturday to tie the Aztecs atop the Mountain West standings. The game was an absolute grind, just the way you’d think it would be against a Brian Dutcher squad. MJ Collins and Mason Falslev couldn’t buy a bucket, but the hero on the day was Karson Templin off the bench who was a major spark with 18 points and 7 boards. That was a game they absolutely had to have as it marks their highest ranked opponent that they’ve beaten. Still not an overly impressive resumé but they won’t apologize for being 17-3 and 6-2 overall in Q1/2. They still have the problem of having no wins in Q1(A) and in fact are one of those teams I’ve referred to previously as they haven’t even played a Q1(A) game much less won one. In my opinion they are walking a fine line right now, as the rest of the power conference teams around them have chances to pick up high quality wins. They can do so much for themselves this week if they can go to New Mexico and pick up a win though. Otherwise they would fall to a measly 1-4 in Q1 with only a couple of chances remaining.

San Diego St (45)

sdsu

The Aztecs fought valiantly, short handed at that, but couldn’t quite get it done when they visited Utah St on Saturday. At the end of the day they couldn’t quite score enough, and missing Elzie Harrington certainly played a role in that. Whatever the case, it still goes down as a Q1 loss, dropping them to just 1-4 in those games. All of these Mountain West resumés look very similar, with not much meat on the Q1 bone but really strong outside of there, especially in the upper Q2 sections. That’s where this ties in to the opener of this week’s watch as we’re likely staring down the question of the mid-major resumés vs the power conference teams who have a ton of losses but they have those signature wins. It’s a tough question to answer, and one that generally has gone the way of the power conference teams in the past, but this year those teams are especially weak. That gives teams like San Diego St a fighting chance, and they still have 6 more Q1/2 chances to beef this thing up. They have the non-con SOS to help boost them, but there’s no question they need to add more W’s down the stretch. This week is just survive and advance as they host Wyoming and then go to Air Force. No disrespect to the troops, but this should be an easy 2-0 week to set up a string of 6 high leverage games in a row.

New Mexico (42)

unm

New Mexico just got through a ho-hum week with 2 road wins that didn’t do much for the resumé other than to avoid disaster as they beat UNLV and San Jose St. On to the next one as the Lobos look to try and beef up their resumé that looks almost identical to San Diego St with a 6-3 record in Q1/2. They welcome in both Utah St and Boise St this week, with the former being a massive Q1 chance at home based on where the Aggies are in the NET. This is one of those weeks where if you can go 2-0 you really position yourself in such a better spot than if you fail to come away with W’s. They have a chance to jump to 8-3 in Q1/2 which would be really strong, adding a 2nd Q1 win and their first over a top-30 opponent. They have a decent non-con win over Santa Clara as well and they have at least played 1 Q1(A) game with the loss to Nebraska so they didn’t just skirt the non-con entirely. All of that to say this is the biggest week left of the season given the nature of the opportunity that it presents, and the swing it could have with different results. I still have them in the dance right now, but barely, and they’ll continue to lose ground on power conference teams like Indiana, Ohio St and Texas if they start stacking wins. Can’t afford to drop Q1 chances at home, especially in a mid-major conference.

Outside Looking In:

Nevada (59)

Let’s all welcome the Wolfpack to the Watch as they weren’t included last week but find themselves the beneficiary of several power conference teams failing to do anything at all. This group is lead by a big 3 with backcourt mates Tayshawn Comer and Corey Camper leading them in scoring and Elijah Price holding things down in the front court. All 3 are transfers in their first year here so credit to Steve Alford for rebuilding this roster and getting to the point they could be in the bubble conversation after losing most of last year’s roster. I’ll be frank to this point the resumé is not worthy of an at-large berth, but they’re 5-1 in Q2 and have just the one bad loss outside of that, so while 0-4 in Q1 is ugly in this bubble environment one big win can put them right in the mix. They have that opportunity this week as they head to Boise St to try and get that elusive Q1 win. They’ve already gone 0-3 against the top-3 in the conference, so they desperately need to cash in on this opportunity if they want to stick around the conversation much longer. I had to include them though because a win in that game really does bring them close to these other MWC resumés, so they certainly have a path. Especially with Utah St and New Mexico still visiting Reno later in February. It all starts this week though, gotta get a big W.

Grand Canyon (68)

Grand Canyon presents us with a little bit more of a unique situation resumé wise as they have multiple Q1 wins they just are battling a couple of bad losses out there as well. Bryce Drew has gotten his team to play better and better as the season has wore on, overcoming that early season loss to Youngstown St to now have picked up wins over Utah St, San Diego St and Boise the last couple of weeks to surge into this conversation. They are led by Jaden Henley on offense, but their top-20 ranking defensively is the real story as they average nearly 4 blocks per game and are strong on the glass thanks to a very big front line. Overall they are 5-5 in Q1/2 with wins over Utah St and Boise representing their 2 Q1 wins, but they also have the win over San Diego St to give them 2 top-50 wins. It’s not a ton to work with but I think it’s enough if they are able to go on a run to end the season. They almost stole one this past week @ Nevada, but fell in OT, so they’re right there knocking at the door. They still host New Mexico and then go to San Diego St and Utah St down the stretch, so there will be chances to build this resumé up a bit. This week they just have to hold serve as they host Air Force (respect the troops) and then go to UNLV. Has to be a 2-0 week to set up a massive game vs New Mexico next week.


–WCC–

Locks:

zags
Proj. 3

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Saint Mary’s (32)  

smc

The Gaels were unable to go into Spokane and knock off Gonzaga, and while that is a tall feat, the loss dropped them to 0-3 in Q1. While I along with everyone else still have them in the field right now, I have them just barely in as I’m not sure how this resumé can be put over some of the teams other people in this world are. Their best win right now is over 55th ranked Virginia Tech. I would argue almost all of the above Mountain West teams have a better resumé right now than the Gaels, as even they lost @ Boise St, so I’m not sure how people think they’re on the 9-10 seed line right now other than just looking at NET ranking. The committee has repeatedly said if all you have is your NET ranking then you don’t have much, and that’s where St. Mary’s is and is going to be until the last week of February. The only Q2 chance they even have is @ Pacific, but that’s honestly not going to add much. Then the last week of the season presents them home games vs Santa Clara and then Gonzaga. I think they very well may have to go 2-0 that week to have high hopes of an at-large berth. If they enter Selection Sunday at 0-4 in Q1 with their best win being, even Santa Clara I don’t know if you can make a case the Gaels would have had a season worthy of going dancing. The pressure is on, albeit in the distant future, but they certainly can’t afford to drop any of the gimme’s on the schedule in the short term.

Santa Clara (43)

Santa Clara just keeps on humming along as they have now won 6 in a row since the loss @ Gonzaga, doing exactly what they need to do to stay in the conversation. This week they at least get a Q2 chance that will be very important not to drop as they go to Pacific. Lifting that record up to 6-1 will only help their cause, and then they go to Wazzu in a Q3 game that they also can’t afford to drop. It’s all about staying focused and surviving right now for the Broncos, as they lie in wait of their big opportunity to come the following week with the Zags coming to town. It really does just all come down to that game, as winning that would put them in prime position to get in with a monster Q1(A) win to hold over the rest of these bubble teams. A loss though, and they’ll be forced to try and win @ St. Mary’s after that to try and pick up a signature win to bring to the table. We’re simply in a wait and see mode, that quickly could take a hit if they drop one they shouldn’t. A treacherous world to live in, but when you are trying to make the dance for the first time in 30 years you have to at least be relishing even being in this position.


–A-10–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

St. Louis (16)

St. Louis was backed into a corner this week as they got down as much as 15 to George Washington at home. Robbie Avila and Trey Green combined for 45 points in the comeback effort that saw them pull a rabbit out of their hat as they outscored the Patriots 24-13 in the final 10 minutes to grab a 3 point W. They followed that up with a 31 point drubbing of Dayton to keep this train rolling as they look poised to go undefeated in the A-10 if they keep up this level of play. I’m going to stay away from how high or low I think they should be seeded and just emphasize they need to avoid adding bad losses to their resumé as they charge forward. They do have the 2-0 Q1 record with wins over Santa Clara and VCU, but neither of those teams are tourney teams right now so I think it could be closer than people realize if they don’t win the A-10 tourney. Nevertheless, there are chances still to add Q1/2 wins that they can’t look past, including this week’s trip to Davidson. Have to just keep on keeping on and we’ll all hope they can cut down the nets in the A-10 tourney so we don’t have to compare them to power conference bubble teams.

Outside Looking in:

VCU (52)

VCU did what they had to do to stay on the fringes of the conversation, as they handled their business at home vs Richmond and Loyola Chi. VCU has a couple of advantages right now in that they played a tougher schedule than most of these mid-major teams and they really don’t have a bad loss. They are just missing that signature win to really vault them into the conversation. They’re 0-5 in Q1 but 16-1 outside of that. Pretty strong, but the only real opportunity they have left prior to the conference tourney is a road trip to St. Louis. That would be a monster win that certainly would catapult them into the same discussions as the Mountain West and WCC teams. I don’t know if they have the goods to go there and upset the Billikens, but that’s the path right now, along with handling their business they way they have consistently done this year against inferior opponents. You could argue their resumé is akin to St. Mary’s right now, with the best win being VA Tech, but they don’t get the luxury of playing Gonzaga at home like the Gaels do. So, we have that Feb 20th date circled and will just hope they don’t step on any land mines between now and then.

George Mason (65)

The Patriots continue to win games they are supposed to as they continue to build that shiny overall record that is now up to 19-2 overall. Their issue is they’ve essentially played nobody as they have just a 1-2 record in Q1/2, so of all the mid-major teams on here they are the furthest away from the actual at-large conversation. What we’re looking at in terms of a path for them continues to be the final week of the season when they go to VCU and then host St. Louis. I would think they’d need both of those wins to surge into this thing with some legitimacy. They will get G. Washington on the road before then as well, so jumping to 4-2 in Q1/2 would give them a real shot if they were to fall in the A-10 tourney. 3-3 may have them in the conversation, but I would see that being a GM logo on the First 4 Out or Next 4 Out graphic on Selection Sunday. The margins are thin, but when you play absolutely zero impact competition in the non-con slate this is what you do to yourself if you want to make a run at an at-large bid. They get Duquesne and St. Joe’s this week, a must go 2-0 week yet again as they lie in wait for their opportunity to strike down the road.


–Others–

Locks: N/A

On the Right Track: N/A

Teetering:

Miami (OH) (53)

The emerging story of college basketball are your Miami RedHawks who have, seemingly out of nowhere, gotten off to a 22-0 start to this season. They are a very balanced group with 5 guys averaging double figures so credit to HC Travis Steele who has recruited and developed many of these guys, with only a couple of transfers who also were here last season. It’s a great mid-major story, and nice to see considering how top heavy the sport is feeling in the portal/NIL era. Now, I hate to take the air out of the balloon, but I’m sure you’re aware at this point the schedule is Charmin soft, which unfortunately is very bad news when it comes to evaluating them for an at-large spot. I have already heard the discussions beginning to take place about what would happen if they run the table and then lose in the MAC tourney. Similar to St. Louis, I have very little hope that the committee would give an at-large spot to a team without a top-50 win. They would have benefitted greatly from a trip to Akron, but unfortunately their only matchup with them was at home and is just a Q2 win. It would be an unprecedented resumé I will admit, but it is likely they would be stacked up next to high major teams who would likely have several top-50 wins. The only way I see it happening is if it’s a close loss to Akron, and even then they need the other bubble resumé’s to be weak. We’ll of course be tracking this week by week, but I know I’ll be rooting hard for the Miami (OH) at-large conversation to be moot come Selection Sunday.

Championship DNA: Week 7 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

Now that we’re 7 weeks into this thing and teams have collected over 20 data points from individual games things are starting to settle in a bit. There are 8-9 teams that are oscillating from Elite to Great to Solid, with Nebraska emerging of latest to toe the line. Vandy is back, Virginia has faded, but overall we’ve been looking at a group with Arizona/Duke/Michigan pacing this thing for a while now. Iowa St/Houston/Gonzaga/Florida have been the next tier with a few others joining/fading. That to me looks like the top two tiers in the sport, with 3 in tier 1 and another 4 in tier 2. The one additional point I’d like to highlight is the nature of this thing not being a power ranking but a stylistic analysis of historical results. The key there would be teams like Michigan St and Illinois who from a ranking perspective are higher up than teams positioned better than them on this graph. The reason I keep harping on is vulnerabilities. Michigan St on offense and Illinois on D are both weak, which represents a reliance on one end of the floor. There have been teams able to overcome that and go deep, but with less reliability than the balanced teams like Vandy/Florida/Nebraska. That is what we’re doing here. Pointing out, with historical proof, that teams that rely on one end of the floor have a vulnerability that can crop up and burn them in a single elimination tournament.

Week 7 Thoughts:

The juggernaut tracker is off the graph as Michigan continues to be below that marker, as well as Arizona. This is a rare territory that only 5 historical teams have ever met entering the dance, so it’s not shocking they weren’t able to sustain that kind of efficiency. We also have to mention Virginia as we gassed them up the last couple of weeks, but they have faded hard as defensively they kind of regressed back to maybe who they really are. Vandy was able to reverse its fortunes as they stormed back into Great territory after dropping back-to-back games. UConn fans surely have to be realizing what we’ve been saying here for 7 weeks, as the offensive struggles are clearly an issue. They haven’t lost yet, but the Big East isn’t offering up tourney level challenges very often, and they’re still struggling. Illinois fans find themselves in the same scenario but on the other end, and while they’re playing well and are hot right now that weakness is still there. I’m also looking out for Kansas, who has slowly been creeping toward serious contender status with Darryn Peterson hopefully back and healthy for a big couple of days with Texas Tech and BYU on deck. Things are starting to settle in, but these teams aren’t done evolving, so we’ll continue to track and see you back here next Friday. Until then, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 6 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

The story that is clearly emerging as we blaze our way through January, is that the top of the sport is the strongest we have ever seen it (in this context ever is since 2002, where my data begins). We currently have 8 teams in either Great or Elite territory (see chart below), which would smash the record of 5 which we saw both last year and in 2019. The important thing to highlight here is of those 10 in ’25 and ’19, 9 of them made it at least to the Elite 8, with both national champions being “Elite”. What I’m suggesting is we are looking primed for another top heavy tournament in March, with the top seeds getting through the first few rounds consistently, unlike say 2023 when there was just 1 Great team and 0 Elite and absolute pandemonium broke out in March with the Final 4 being seeds 4/5/9/9. I would bet strongly we don’t see anything like that play out, with likely top seeded Arizona/Duke/Michigan/Iowa St/Houston all looking strong analytically. What I’m seeing are some titanic matchups between really good teams starting in the Sweet 16 and continuing from there, making this potentially less wild and chaotic but possibly the most treacherous road to a title we’ve ever seen. You are simply going to have to knock off 3-4 very strong teams to cut the nets down in Indy. So while we may not have the cinderella runs we’ve all become accustomed to, the 2nd and 3rd weekends should feature some incredible games between high powered teams. True hoops fans rejoice.

Week 6 Thoughts:

We are still going to be upsetting UConn fans as they linger down away from the top contenders, but I want to mention I still have them as a 1 seed in the tournament. This is not a resumé tool this is just an analytics based look at where teams stand compared to historical results. The Huskies offense simply needs to improve for them to be considered more reliable, it is a vulnerability at this stage those other teams don’t have. Next, we have to talk Vandy, who has now dropped 3 in a row and slid from borderline Elite to the triad of Wannabe/Strong Enough/Solid. The data doesn’t know what to make of them anymore than I do, but one thing is for sure, defensively they have regressed with the increased competition in the SEC. Nebraska is trending in the other direction, moving closer and closer to Great territory as they remain undefeated. That matchup with Michigan looms large next week, but even a close loss would cement them as a true contender. Speaking of Michigan, the Juggernaut Watch is taking a pause for a week as they fell below that > 50 Net++ spread, while Arizona continues to inch closer themselves. Lastly, we have to mention Virginia again, as they have made one of the largest jumps we’ve seen, moving all the way into Great territory after being a Matador in our 1st edition. Massive improvement defensively, even with the jump in competition in the ACC so shoutout to Ryan Odom and the Hoos. That about does it so until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 4 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

Welcome back to another week of this journey to track the top teams in the country and how they stack up compared to teams of the past, from an analytical standpoint. What I’m going to address this week are the “notches” in the Wannabe category that had UNC fans upset last week, with Nebraska and Texas Tech fans likely joining them this week. Let me first say, and I can’t emphasize this enough, these archetypes exist independent of this season’s teams and where they fall. They were created using historical results of actual teams in March going back to 2002. I have compiled the results for the teams that fall into those notches as a proof of exactly why I included them into the Wannabe archetype and not Strong Enough. From a data standpoint they align much closer with Wannabe results, with a better 1st and 2nd round result but actually a worse track record beyond that. A strong enough team is 10 times more likely to reach the Final 4, and > 20 points more reliable round by round to advance. Here is the data, and it’s listed again below the full table for easy comparison below.

From a basketball perspective, the general philosophy behind this is pretty simple, but allow me to explain. A team like Texas Tech has a clear weakness, defense. Their offense is not “strong enough” to reliably make up for that inadequacy in a single elimination tournament. The inverse applies to Nebraska, as they’re very good defensively but not enough to make up for the lack of offensive ability. That is the general idea, as it stands to reason as you get worse on one end of the floor you better be able to make up for on the other end. So, you tighten the constraints, which is what gives the jagged look as you go from Strong Enough-Solid-Solid-Strong Enough. Also, I understand the record of these teams, specifically Nebraska who is 15-0, but this one week snapshot doesn’t pigeon hole them forever. The Kenpom data is predictive, and given they played teams like Winthrop and USC Upstate to single digit finals, you can assume the next 15 games might go a little different. The beauty of this series is we’ll track it all the way through Selection Sunday, so we’ll see how it plays out.

Week 4 Thoughts:

The Juggernaut Watch is alive and well, but Michigan is pushing the boundary so we’ll see if they can keep up their level of domination as we’re still just now approaching the halfway point. The other big story has to be the 6 Elite teams, which would break the record currently held by the 2019 season which had 5. This story to me is a continuation from last season, as in my opinion we are watching a transformation of the sport playing out in real time. The top teams are just more complete than we have seen in the past, with the ability to add veteran depth through the portal in a way that has just never existed. Yes, we had grad transfers in the past, but the way rosters are able to transform and allow for coaches to plug holes or improve weaknesses is something we haven’t seen at this scale. Coaches are understanding how to roster build, and with that I think we will continue to see a larger group of dominant teams at the top of the sport. I could be wrong, but I do think, at least at the top, teams have improved and March will be a bit less unpredictable, a la last season. Some other notable storylines we’re tracking would be led by UConn still existing in just the Solid archetype, much to the chagrin of Husky fans. The offensive numbers have improved, but much of the country certainly has a perspective of UConn right now that doesn’t align with the data. A beautiful opportunity to test the collective hive mind vs the analytics. Finally, Vandy had a prove it moment the other night and knocked off Alabama, their biggest win to date and a bit of a solidifying moment that this team is a legit contender, not just in the SEC but for a deep March run. We’ll continue to track all of these movements and respond with data to all questions/concerns about the overall methodology. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 3 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

We’re back and as requested I’m going to quickly dive into each archetype with an explanation and some info on methodology. You can skip ahead if that’s not of interest.

Elite: This one feels self explanatory a bit but these are the best of the best teams in the country, with top of the sport strength on both ends of the floor. Numbers wise the cutoffs are relatively the top 8-12 teams each year, give or take, with the idea that the teams that are that good on both sides of the floor are your truly elite overall teams, and the results speak for themselves.

Great: For Great we take a step down, allowing for a little wider threshold but still capturing some of the best teams in the country. There have been years where there are only 1 or 2 Elite teams, with the occasional 0, so in theory the best team in a given year could only fit into the Great archetype. The numbers are relatively similar to Elite early in the tournament, but by the Elite 8/Final 4 we see a big dropoff, which made me feel confident we had drawn a necessary line in the sand.

Solid: Again we widen the net to capture the good teams who still are balanced enough to find fairly reliable results in March, but obviously have a weakness emerging that trips up teams with this makeup far more than the archetypes above them. The lines drawn here, if you were here last week, were clearly some of the trickier to determine, but it started on feel and observation and were refined with backtesting. I feel confident the areas left out align closer with the unreliable Archetype’s than this one.

Strong Enough: You will notice the main difference here is the notch on the chart, where we’ve tightened the screws on a teams strength to be required to be great, in order to makeup for the weakness getting even weaker in this archetype. That change helped strengthen the reliability of this group, suggesting again that as you grow more and more unbalanced, the stronger your strength needs to be to find consistent success in March. As far as the lines to separate Matadors/Grinders, again it was initially chosen on feel and refined from there with backtesting. It usually lies somewhere around the top-50, give or take a few depending on the year.

Matadors: These are the teams that put on a show offensively, but as the saying goes, they play olé defense which is the inspiration for the name. The idea here is simple, they cannot be trusted because while they are very good offensively, to win 4 or 5 or 6 straight games against high quality opponents, you are eventually going to need to get stops and these teams can’t do it reliably. Again, the data agrees, they are not to be trusted. Although that does not mean it is impossible, but a Matador has never (since 2002 when my data begins) won the title so there’s that.

Grinders: Similar to the Matadors this is the group that has a big weakness but is very strong on the other end of the floor. These teams actually struggle even more than Matadors overall, suggesting while defense may win championships it can’t be done without some semblance of reliable scoring. Last year this included St. John’s, many people’s favorite to challenge for a Final 4, who ultimately bowed out in the 2nd round. This entire project began when I started drawing these lines, with the hunch that these teams who are very unbalanced struggled in March. Here we are with strong data to backup what was an initial feeling.

Wannabe: The name here is an ode to the fact these teams all have somewhat of an identity, but it just happens to be inferior to the teams we are deeming reliable. A team like Texas Tech right now for example is much better offensively than defensively, but they aren’t as good as they need to be to make up for their inefficient defense. They wannabe that elite offensive team that can get by with some defensive holes, but it’s just not there. It can happen on the flip side as well, with teams like UNC and Indiana displaying that right now. Even our balanced but not overly special teams in the center like UK or Iowa just don’t have the overall strength to be reliable. The cutoffs were essentially to try and see if hey do these teams just on the outside looking in of our reliable group drop off that heavy? The answer is a resounding yes, but still they do perform a bit better than the truly average teams in Vanilla.

Vanilla: Another pretty self explanatory one here but this is just the leftover archetype where some of the teams may squeak into. Often the fringe of the top-40, but the interesting ones are similar to this year’s Villanova team where they have had success, actually inside the top-30 overall even, but still just overall not consistently good on either end. Not a good track record in March to say the least.

Week 3 Thoughts:

Well, it wouldn’t be right if we didn’t mention the Juggernaut Watch is still in effect as Michigan has done nothing to suggest otherwise since we last met. Now, it’s officially Big Ten season the rest of the way for the Wolverines, so we’ll see if the dominance continues as they travel to some of these tough environments. They currently sit 2nd in Net Eff++ behind only the 2015 UK team that didn’t lose a game until the Final 4 (a loss to the all-time best off eff++ Wisconsin). Next, we have to mention Duke, who stubbed their toe in a loss to Texas Tech and then survived a scare at home to GA Tech after that. Those results were enough to drop them from Elite to Great. A big shift, but with less than half of the overall data points to be collected, we are still going to see bigger shifts after 1 or 2 games until we load up more and more data. By the end of February, results like those won’t move the needle as much because it will be 1 or 2 points in a pool of 30, not 12. Worth noting, as we saw several other big moves like St. John’s falling to unreliable, Purdue rising to Great, and BYU falling to Solid. There will continue to be shifts, but that’s why we’re here, as storylines will continue to develop and then play out. Can Duke recover? Will the shine rub off the Wolverines? Is Vandy as Elite just lipstick on a pig? Are UConn fans going to see the data align with their perception of their team? All questions we will find answers to over the next 2.5 months of ball. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

Championship DNA: Week 2 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

For those of you new here, Week 1 will give you a full breakdown of what we’re doing.

We’re back for an update and we have some adjustments to discuss as we continue to mold this new project. The biggest change was to the “Solid” Archetype where I cut out what I would say was a hole in the middle, where the teams that lied there were neither Great offensively or defensively, kind of living in a middle ground. This currently is where Nebraska and Iowa reside, and once I ran the numbers they aligned, results wise, closer to the Wannabe archetype than the Solid archetype. This move shored up the Solid group to make it more reliable and right in line with Strong Enough as a 3rd tier grouping of reliability behind Elite and Great, with little change to the Wannabe archetype – an easy decision.

Next was just a potentially temporary move to help showcase how ridiculous Michigan has been so far, as they currently sit in a territory only 5 teams have occupied since 2002. All 5 of those teams made it to the Final 4 with 3 of them advancing to the title game. Clearly that is off the charts reliability, as a 100% hit rate on Final 4 trips is unprecedented. The line of demarcation is a > 50 net efficiency++, or spread between O++ and D++. I have chiseled out that section and dubbed it the “Juggernaut” archetype. The rarity calls for special treatment in my opinion, and it will be fascinating to watch and see if they can keep this level of play up all the way to March entering the tourney. For reference, 2024 Florida is included in this along with 2019 Virginia who both won the title. The all-time biggest spread was 2015 Kentucky who went undefeated until the Final 4, and Michigan trails then by a couple of tenths of a point so very close.

Week 2 Thoughts:

As I said above Michigan is the story at the top, but we still have 5 Elite teams which would tie the record all-time and surpass last year’s 4. Overall with the carve out in the Solid group as well as some teams rising and falling we’ve dropped to just 16 in our reliable categories after debuting with 20. I still expect efficiencies to drop as most teams have 18-20 games against conference opponents to go, so competition will rise and teams will have poor showings. On a micro level, clearly Vandy has to be the surprise of the season jumping all the way into “Great” territory with 3-star Sophomore PG Tyler Tanner being the story early on. I think most of the others involved here are usual suspects, and while some may be over-performing to have Vandy what I would consider 7th overall and the leader in the SEC is shocking. Bama has finally fallen to where I think they should reside as a Matador, and Kansas has become our first Grinder to watch. Last year it was St. John’s holding down the grinder spot week after week, and they were upset in R2. I don’t want to be alarmist for Jayhawk fans so I’ll say it’s just December, long way to go and your best player has been hurt so remain calm. All in all it’s still early but some interesting story lines are developing. Next update will be 2 weeks from now as I’ll pause for Christmas. See you then.

Championship DNA: Week 1 – 2025-26 College Basketball Archetype Board

Welcome to the place where we have set out to use historical March Madness results to try and identify the characteristics that most often lead to success in the big dance. Or simply, to define what true Championship DNA looks like. I understand many will scoff at the idea of basketball being reduced to numbers on a screen, and trust me I can sympathize with that, but what I’ve done is accept the reality that my own eyeballs cannot consistently make correct predictions in March. Data can do a much better job than my eyeballs, and most likely yours as well. I’m here to show you that you in fact can reliably start to sort the top teams in the country and recognize which teams are going to have the best shot at the Final 4 and ultimately winning a national title. Many have tried, often saying something like “no team outside of x or outside of y that also hasn’t done z has won it all”, but I’m going to try and make it more about reliability than elimination. Allow me to explain.

The Data:

The base layer of this is that I’ve taken pre-tourney Kenpom efficiency data from every season since 2002 and compiled it. The obvious thing when looking at the numbers on the surface is that the game is changing stylistically as teams chase offensive efficiency and overall offensive skill develops. To put it concretely, average offensive efficiency in 2002 was 102 while currently in 2025 it is 107.4. To get even more granular, the 2nd best offensive team in 2002 was Oregon with an Ortg of 119.9. Today they would rank 23rd. In their day, that Oregon team was an elite offensive group relative to their competition, so we need a way to normalize this rating in order to fairly judge teams across time. We need to put every current team on the exact same scale, so we’ll be using normalized efficiency (OE++ / DE++) so a dominant 2002 offense isn’t punished next to today’s higher-scoring game. Think of it like this: KenPom data will tell you who’s good any given year relative to that year’s competition. OE++ and DE++ tell you how good they are compared to every tournament field for the last 23 years. Ultimately, the goal was to confidently be able to remove team name and season, and be left with a fair assessment of all teams since 2002 and their results in March.

Once the data was compiled it was time to test my original theory and see if I could identify common characteristics that most often led to deep runs in the tournament. My original hypothesis was that despite high overall efficiency, the teams that lean heavily on one end of the floor struggle more than well balanced teams, even if less efficient overall. As I studied and pulled the data my hypothesis was largely proven right, so I began to try and classify certain archetypes of teams. I landed on 8 key archetypes; Elite – Great – Solid – Strong Enough – Matadors – Grinders – Wannabes – Vanilla. Here is the table with exact historical results: Note: R2 indicates teams who reached the 2nd round, all the way to CH which indicates the teams who reached the Title game (46 total over 23 years).

For some additional proof this is still applying today even as the game changes:

2025: Final 4 was comprised of our 4 Elite teams. A direct reflection of how strong the field was at the top.

2024: Only 1 Elite team – UConn who won the title

2023: 0 Elite teams and the bracket descended into madness. However, our 2nd most reliable team UConn (Strong Enough) won the title as a 4 seed.

For a clear example of this playing out on the other end of the spectrum with specific ++ data consider this. Of the top-5 OE++ teams since 2002, two of them lost the first weekend – 2012 Mizzou (Matador) and 2014 Creighton (Matador). Both of them struggled to defend, which is why they landed in the matador archetype, and they suffered first weekend upsets. Meanwhile, the other 3 all fell in a reliable archetype and made deep runs, including the greatest offensive team 2015 Wisconsin (OE++ 131.87) who lost in the title game to Duke.

While nothing is 100% you can clearly see the stronger you are overall, combined with the ability to succeed on both ends of the floor, are strong indicators of your reliability to have March success. So, moving forward I am going to post a weekly update on Friday morning’s showing where the top-40 teams in Kenpom stand. For context, entering the tournament just 5 of the 92 (5.4%) total Final 4 teams since 2002 have entered the tourney outside the top-40 so that is why I landed on 40.

It begins today: Here is your Week 1 Championship DNA Board

Week 1 Thoughts:

The obvious thing jumping out at me early this year is we have a lot of really good teams at the top of the sport right now. I have a few thoughts on why, but let’s just get it out there, 20 teams in my reliable archetypes, including 5 in elite, would make for an outlier season. I do not expect that to be the final number once we get to Selection Sunday. In general, these efficiency numbers tend to bloat early in the season thanks to cupcakes on the schedule that the really good teams handle with ease, so I expect the rigor of conference play to diminish the number of teams in these reliable archetypes at least by a handful. There is a competing force as well though, as I do think the transfer portal and influx of talent from overseas is causing the teams at the top to improve. It has never been easier for a team to plug holes, reload after guys leave and even add depth, than it is right now. Unfortunately, for those who love upsets and chaos in March, we may be moving toward an era where that is drastically reduced. I don’t want to jump to that conclusion just yet, but after last year having all 4 number 1 seeds be dominant teams that all made the Final 4, and the way this year is starting out, you can’t help but go there. The exciting thing is we’re going to get to see this all play out as this will be a weekly update, so we’ll see if it’s more bloat from early season cupcakes or if we truly are seeing a concentration of talent at the top of the sport. Until next week, enjoy the hoops.

SEC College Basketball 2025-26 Season Preview

RankTeam
1.Florida
2.Kentucky
3.Arkansas
4.Alabama
5.Tennessee
6.Auburn
7.Texas
8.Mississippi St
9.Ole Miss
10.Vandy
11.Georgia
12.Mizzou
13.Texas A&M
14.Oklahoma
15.LSU
16.S. Carolina


1.) Florida (#3)

The defending champs have reloaded around a strong group of returners from last year’s group, led again by Todd Golden who has proven he was the exact right hire, bringing the Gators back to their championship caliber they had under Billy Donovan nearly 20 years ago. This year’s team will feature many familiar faces, especially in the froncourt as the entire 4 man rotation at the 4/5 spots are back. The backcourt is an entirely different situation though, as all 3 starters are gone and Aberdeen, the first guy off the bench, is also gone. That turns our attention to the portal, as Golden brought in 3 dynamite guards to replace what was lost, with Boogie Fland, Xaivian Lee and AJ Brown all poised to play major roles in this backcourt rotation. Freshmen CJ Ingram and Alex Lloyd will also compete for minutes, giving them 5 newcomers all looking to start. Klavzar and Brown coming back will have a chance as well, but we didn’t seem much of Brown and Klavzar was mostly just a catch a shoot option. I would expect the transfers and Ingram to dominate the minutes, and I think it’s a talented enough group to pair with this dominant frontcourt to make the Gators a threat to go back-to-back. It is all going to come down to how the guards defend, as guys like Richard and Martin were menaces on D for a team that went from 94th to 6th on D from 2023 to 2024. That was the difference for this program, and if they can continue that dominant effort on that end they will continue to be a force. My prediction is they take a small step back on D, but that still leaves an elite team offensively that plays solid D, good enough to win the SEC and make a deep run in March.

2.) Kentucky (#7)

The transition from John Calipari to Mark Pope was pretty seamless as the Wildcats were very competitive in a gauntlet of an SEC, and then they got to the 2nd weekend in the tourney for the first time since 2019. It was a complete rebuild with transfers and freshmen alike, so only bringing back 4 guys isn’t a huge concern since much of their roster was made up of seniors. Oweh being back is gigantic and pairing him with Jaland Lowe at PG gives UK a very exciting and proven scoring duo in the backcourt. Inside they are going to be extremely athletic and versatile, with guys like Quaintance, Williams and Dioubate transferring in to join Garrison and FR Moreno. That’s going to be a deep group that not only can help with the scoring load but should be very versatile defensively, and that’s not even including the Croatian Jelavic who could have an impact. Johnson and Aberdeen give them depth in the backcourt as well, so I have no doubt they have the top end talent to justify this ranking, but they also have the depth to withstand a long season. I don’t think they’ll be as good of a shooting team, but I expect them to continue to push the pace and with all of these athletes they should just be attacking downhill relentlessly. Pope proved in year 1 he is going to be able to capitalize on the resources here at Kentucky, which means we should expect them to continue to be at or near the top of the SEC and be a Final 4 threat year in and year out. This year will be no exception.

3.) Arkansas (#11)

Year 1 under Cal brought Arkansas right back to relevance, and while they weren’t at the top of the SEC he did finally get them rolling as the year went on, seeing them finish 8-5 in the league and get to the Sweet 16 after knocking off Rick Pitino and St. John’s. I think that positive momentum continues into this year, with 4 major contributors back, some international talent and most importantly those two 5-star FR guards who should come in and give them instant pop scoring the ball. They developed into a top-20 team defensively last year, which will need to continue for them to finish where I have them this year. My expectation if that does happen is that the FR guards give them a lift on the other end and all of a sudden you have a team that plays with physicality, the way they did last year, and can score at much higher level. They certainly lost guys like Thiero and Aidoo who helped them on D, but they played stretches without them and the young guys played well. I think we see a jump from Karter Knox and Billy Richmond who both emerged down the stretch and that, combined with the incoming talent, should vault the Razorbacks into contention in the SEC. Cal’s best teams at UK were consistently top-20 defensively, and while it fell off the last few years much of that was due to relying solely on FR that just couldn’t get it down quick enough. The mix of returning experience with some FR adding in where they fit to me is a much more solid approach and should drive them to taking a step forward in year 2.

4.) Alabama (#13)

Nate Oats continues to roll with the Tide as he’s navigated them to 5 straight tourneys, 4 of which they made it to the 2nd weekend, including last year’s Elite 8 run. Throw in a regular season title and 3 straight top-3 finishes overall in the SEC and it’s clear this is one of the best programs, not just in the SEC, but in the entire country right now. With all of that said, this might be his least talented team on paper that he’s had in a couple of years. While I still think they’re a top-15 team probably, the incoming FR are not elite and the transfers are more solid than great, and ultimately they don’t have that All-American potential player that we’ve come accustomed to seeing here under Oats. The backcourt of Philon/Holloway/Wrightsell will be fun to watch push the ball and fire away from 3, but they’re undersized and not the best defensively. I think Bethea could be a wildcard as he was a 5-star recruit to Miami last year and could give them more size at the guard spot, so if he can up his shooting numbers he could fit right in. They are also going to need transfer big man Williamson to be impactful as he should share the center load with returning Soph Sherrell who did show promise last year. Don’t get me wrong the talent is still here, but at the end of a close game who are you trusting with the ball in his hands to get it done? In the past it was guys like Mark Sears or Brandon Miller, but honestly Philon and Holloway have been pretty erratic so far in their careers. I’m worried about the defense regressing and same with their overall efficiency offensively. Small step back for Bama, but still a tourney team that is always going to be dangerous in March if they get hot from deep.

5.) Tennessee (#14)

The Final 4 continues to elude the Tennessee program under Rick Barnes, as they’ve now been to back-to-back Elite 8’s and 4 total Sweet 16’s over the last few years but haven’t been able to break through. This year might be a bit tougher, as this is the team with probably the most question marks for me coming into the season because nearly all of the production from last year’s team is gone. They are going to be relying heavily on transfer PG Ja’Kobi Gillespie and FR phenom Nate Ament. The latter is the guy who is likely going to have to shoulder the offensive load, as there really isn’t a ton of proven scoring and playmaking outside of Gillespie, who will need to be the Robin to Ament’s Batman. The next question is will Barnes be able to get all of these newcomers up to snuff on the defensive side of the ball, something we’ve come to expect from the Vols with him as the head man. They have been top-5 defensively each of the past 5 seasons, which is pretty remarkable, and really only Houston can come anywhere close to that kind of consistency on that end over that time span. The culture is there, but can it be preserved without the roster continuity that we’ve seen in the past? Even if it does and they’re back to being a top-5 team defensively, then we turn our attention back to the guard play and that’s the scary thing. Gillespie will run the show, but is LA Tech transfer Amaree Abram ready to step right into SEC play? What about the Israeli guard Burg? Or maybe it’s top-75 recruit Evans? I’ve used enough question marks to get my point across I believe. I trust Barnes enough to consider this Vols team a top-20 team going in, I mean most programs after the top-5 or so have questions, but it might be bumpy out of the gates as he searches for those answers. Either way, you’re going to at least want to tune in to see Ament who should be a top-5 pick and will heavily impact their ceiling this year.

6.) Auburn (#20)

Speaking of question marks, what on earth should we expect from this Auburn program this year now that only Tahaad Pettiford remains? That of course includes former HC Bruce Pearl who just a few days ago as of writing this retired and left the keys to the program to his son Steven. Almost an entirely new roster, a somewhat new coaching staff, at least at the top…what do we do with that? Well, I’m going to try and focus on the talent at hand, and it’s certainly there for this to be a top-25 team despite the turbulence felt in the fall. Pettiford is an All-American caliber guard now that he can run the show and he’ll be joined by Keyshawn Hall who scored at an elite level with UCF last year as a hybrid 3/4 man. Not only that, international big Jovic has promise as well, so there are options here for them offensively. Depth is going to be a concern though there’s no doubt about that, as they’re simply forced to rely on JUCO guys and FR to fill out their rotation. They may not need them to score double figures but the FR Williams-Adams and Magwood along with the DII/JUCO transfers are going to need to provide quality minutes there’s no way around it. So, what I’m saying is they’re top heavy, with at the very least a 1-2 combo in Pettiford and Hall that should ball out every night and get them into the upper half of the conference. In order to push further than that they need Murphy and Jovic to be solid contributors and some other guard to emerge to help Pettiford out. All of that is ignoring the fact their head coach just left the program. Expectations should still be high due to the talent, but asking Steven Pearl to have this much success might be asking too much. We’ll see how it plays out.

7.) Texas

Well the Rodney Terry experiment has come to its inevitable conclusion as he got worse YOY in each of his 3 full seasons after taking over for Chris Beard. In comes a proven vet in Sean Miller who has not only retained some holdovers from last year, a tough thing to do in today’s environment, but also brought in some very nice pieces to fit around them. The trio of Pope/Mark/Weaver give them stability in the backcourt, and you can see based on who was brought in Miller is comfortable with those guys as he focused mostly on the 3-5 positions. We know his play style is a fast paced game with a wide open offense, as we’ve seen it at both Arizona and Xavier. He brought in guys like Cam Heide who is athletic and can really shoot it, but also guys like Wilcher and Swain who prefer to get out and run and attack downhill from the wing spot. Inside the german transfer Duru should come right in and have a role at the 4 spot with mid-major transfers like Traore and Vokietaitis looking to play the 4/5 spot as well. It’s much more of a question mark what you’ll get from that group, and that’s the hesitation as rebounding and protecting the paint could be a major concern. I don’t doubt they’ll be able to score, but much like Miller’s prior stops at Xavier and Arizona, the defensive end will tell the story in terms of how much success they have. They seem like a borderline top-25 team that should make the tourney, but again, if they can’t defend or rebound they could fall short of that. I’m betting on Miller and the guards, but I’m not super confident.

8.) Mississippi St

It is indisputable that Chris Jans is a fantastic HC in college basketball, now getting the Mississippi St Bulldogs to 3 straight tourney’s after they made it just once the 13 seasons prior to his arrival. They happen to be 0-3 in the dance, but eventually they are going to break through in my opinion. They have one of the best scoring guards in the SEC back in Josh Hubbard, and while much of the production outside of him has parted ways, the incoming group is solid and should position them right back in the middle of this conference. Epps alongside Hubbard gives them a solid 1-2 punch in the backcourt, and guys like Achor, Walker and Ballard give them solid pieces up front as well. They also welcome in 3 top-100 recruits who will hopefully stick around and develop under Jans so he can try and sustain some cohesion going forward. I will be interested to see the style of play, as to start his tenure Jans had this program mucking games up, playing a physical brand of ball that produced top-10 defenses, they just struggled to score. It flipped by year 3 where they were a top-25 offense but barely top-50 on D. All 3 years ended about the same, but how they got there was much different, especially the pace as they went from 336th to 127th. Either way, I don’t see this roster competing with the top of the league, but they certainly could get back into the dance as a 8-10 seed and try and take another step forward by winning a tourney game.

9.) Ole Miss

I am a noted Chris Beard stan so I tend to have his team’s a bit higher than most in the preseason because I do believe he’s one of the best coaches in the country. It took him just to year 2 at Ole Miss to start doing things that hadn’t been done in 24 years in Oxford by getting the Rebs to the Sweet 16. Almost all of their production were Seniors though, so really only Malik Dia is back as a major contributor, so it will be tough to maintain that same level of success. The biggest question I had when looking at the roster was AJ Storr…was last year an aberration or is he really just cashing a check? Beard’s #1 priority has to be to get Storr to buy in and play hard, because if he does that he’s a fantastic player and could be their leading scorer and a main reason they get back to the dance this year. Around him guys like Scott, Johnson and Perry all come from P5 schools and are looking for expanded roles. They have promise I’ll say that, but this could easily fall short, especially if Storr is not a reliable double digit scorer and a complete no-show on D again. The frontcourt is full of guys Beard loves as they’re undersized but athletic, which helps with his high pressure defensive style as he’s historically played small ball 5’s so they can switch 1-5. He shifted back to that last year and transformed them from 141st on D to top-25. I expect them to defend well again, and if Storr buys in they could be a top-25 team, but I’m hesitant on that. There’s a chance he plays lazy D and Beard does exactly what Self did and barely plays him. Even if that happens I think they can make the tourney, that’s how much I respect Beard, but they’ll be scratching and clawing down the stretch to get there.

10.) Vandy

Mark Byington deserves a ton of credit for what he did with Vandy last year, bringing in almost an entirely new roster and taking that team to the tourney. He is forced to do that again basically, as he saw 8 guys hit the portal and in turn brought in 8 new faces via the portal. They do get 2 starters back with Nickel and McGlockton back as the starting frontcourt, but they’ll likely hope that Jalen Washington from UNC can be the starting 5 and actually give them some size inside after starting those 2 at just 6’7″ last year down the stretch at the 4/5 spots. The backcourt is entirely overhauled, and while the metric sites seem to like all that they added, it looks to me like a lot of inefficient scorers, relying on a guy like Frankie Collins who is now on his 4th team in 4 years, to run the show. There are some nice pieces here don’t get me wrong, with guys like James and Miles already proving they can produce at the P5 level. My concern with them is on the defensive side of the ball, and my mind is blown at what sites like KP and Miya have them ranked preseason on that end given how bad they were last year and how bad Byington teams have historically played on that end. I for one, do not expect them to transform into a top-25 defense like KP does, as Byington has never even had a top-70 team defensively. He wants to play fast and score, defense seems to be an after thought. They should rebound better, maybe defend the paint better with Washington, but I still don’t see it being the emphasis that it needs to be to get to that level. Because of that I think they’re a bubble team that will be right on the border of in or NIT, and while he proved his ability to build the roster last year and get them to play well offensively, it cannot be overstated how difficult it is to do that and get a team to be elite defensively. I don’t see that happening, unlike some computers.

11.) Georgia

Similar to Beard at Ole Miss this is just a bet on Mike White who I really think is building something at a school where most could care less because it’s so heavily a football school. They made the dance last year for the first time since 2015, and while they didn’t get their first win since 2002, you feel like that was a major step to just get there again. I like that he has kept a few of his recruits with guys like Cain, Cyril and James all coming back, and this group of transfers is actually pretty exciting. Catchings was a top-50 recruit with good size and can really shoot it, and the guards coming in to help Cain all have shown promise and have multiple years of eligibility aside from Bailey. Really what I trust from White is that his teams are going to play hard and play well defensively. I don’t know if the talent will mesh or what the ceiling is, but I do think the guys coming back can develop and take a step forward and I like the promise of the transfer guys. They have gone from 132–>58–>32 defensively over his 3 years, so I would expect that his standard and culture has been established. The question will be can they score enough with these uber-talented SEC teams to compete and find their way back into the dance. I’m not sure of that, but I do think it’s an underrated roster and White is an underrated coach who has done a good job here. Bubble team is my expectation, with the acknowledgement they may not be able to score well enough to be a tourney team.

12.) Mizzou

Have to give Dennis Gates his flowers here because heading into last year this program, and his reputation, were in total flux. Year 1 saw them make a surprise tourney run and win a game, and then the wheels fell of and they went 0-18 in the SEC in 2024. Remarkably, the administration stuck with Gates, as did a good portion of the team, and with some transfer help they quickly rebounded to make another tourney appearance last year. Once again, Gates is welcoming back a good portion of last year’s roster, with returning starters Mark Mitchell, Anthony Robinson and Trent Pierce all back. The bigger thing I’ve been watching is he’s retaining both FR and transfers in, so the guys are buying into what he’s selling here even with that disaster results wise in 2024. All of that said, they did lose some very important pieces in the backcourt, as Grill, Bates, Perkins and Warrick were all big time contributors and integral to their success. So, how are they backfilling? Well, they’re going to turn to transfers Jayden Stone and Sebastian Mack plus top-100 recruit Boateng who they’ll need to make a SO jump. Therein-lies the reason for them being this low in my mind, as they were a top-10 offense both years Gates got them to the tourney, and I’m not feeling that great about Mack and Stone, both guys who have struggled from 3. They have never defended well under Gates overall, but their 2 good seasons they were top-10 in steal %. That’s the goal here, playing fast and high pressure D that generates steals by gambling. Don’t succeed and you’re out of position and give up a bucket. In summary, I see regression on both ends. Maybe Stone and Mack deliver, maybe they defend the paint better and generate steals at the same rate, but that’s too much to overcome in my opinion to see them repeat last year’s success.

13.) Texas A&M

Texas A&M is now the latest victim of Buzz Williams’ desire to abandon programs he has built up, and they now have to turn to Bucky McMillan who has spent the last few years running wild at Samford in the SoCo. He is going to have the Aggies playing his run and gun style but there is no reason for me to believe this hodge podge of transfers under Bucky is going to play even a lick of defense. Yes, I’m willing to admit the talent level coming in here is actually good enough for them to compete in the SEC, with guys like Pop Isaacs, Mgbako and Griffin all proven guys at the P5 level. It just screams of an AAU pick-up style of play where they just push the pace, launch from deep and play zero defense. Bucky never had a top-100 defense at Samford and actually only cracked the top-200 once, which was his lone trip to the tourney in 2024. That team was 15th in the country at forcing TO’s, so if there’s a glimmer of hope here is that they adopt that havoc style of defense and these guys buy into that and can generate TO’s with a high pressure style of play. The issue he had at Samford was they took a lot of chances, gambled and got out of position, so their FG% allowed was abysmal. That’s what I expect from them this year, and while they should be able to score with anyone it’s not going to be enough in a league this tough from top to bottom.

14.) Oklahoma

Porter Moser finally had a breakthrough of sorts last year with the Sooners as he finally got them to the dance in year 4. Unfortunately for him almost that entire team is gone, headlined by Jeremiah Fears heading to the NBA early. It’s going to be tough sledding for him but there is a tiny glimmer of hope considering the top end talent that he got in the portal. All 4 of these transfers should start, with the 5th starter up in the air. That takes you to the guys beyond that top 4, which is a giant question mark with returning guys that haven’t proven production at this level, coming from mid-major schools, JUCO, Denmark and of course high school. At the end of the day, I think the transfers keep the ship afloat but it is impossible to predict what kind of help those guys are going to have around them, much less how they gel and play together. Individually they are very good college basketball players, but how they come together and how they’re supported is a complete unknown and why I am keeping them down here. They are certainly not without hope to get back to the tourney, which is the crazy thing about the SEC as there are now 14 teams who legitimately enter the season with hopes to get to the tourney. I don’t think the Sooners will be one of them, but if they’re fighting on the bubble come February I wouldn’t be surprised by any means.

15.) LSU

I don’t really know what’s going on with Matt McMahon at LSU and I’m not really sure anyone cares in the administration. He has 3 seasons under his belt and has underperformed in each of them, with his best finish 88th in Kenpom. In fact, he has finished >35 spots lower than their preseason ranking each of those 3 seasons, meaning the talent on the roster is greater than the results we are seeing. Doing less with more year after year is usually a cause for firing, but we march on with McMahon in Baton Rouge. We are essentially looking at a team with a compilation of mid-major talent, and while they’re proven at that level we’re talking about what is now the best conference in the sport. You’re not competing with Florida/Kentucky/Alabama with a bunch of mid-major guys. Can some guys rise up and contribute, even at a high level sometimes, yes. But when that’s most of your roster it’s just not going to work. He did get 3 top-100 recruits so I’ll give him credit there, but his ability to hold on to them as Sophomore’s in the past has been essentially 0. Again, every year he has wildly missed expectations and this year is the lowest starting point yet. Not great.

16.) South Carolina

It is starting to look like the 2024 trip to the NCAA tourney was more of a one-off for Lamont Paris than a sign of momentum here at S. Carolina. I do think he’s a good coach but he appears to not be getting the resources needed to compete in the SEC right now. Most of the talent is gone from last year’s team that won just 2 conference games, and maybe that includes some addition by subtraction if you’re trying to be positive, but it’s never a good sign when that many guys are fleeing the program. The bigger issue is what is coming in to replace it as there are 4 low rated recruits and 6 transfers that frankly are not moving the needle besides the return of Meechie Johnson. It’s pretty clear this is the least talented roster on paper and given Paris has 2 seasons under his belt in which he won just 5 combined SEC games, there’s precedent for the Gamecocks to finish last. Yes, 2024 happened, but I’m looking at that as an outlier at this point, especially given the gap in talent.

Big East College Basketball 2025-26 Season Preview

RankTeam
1.UConn
2.St. John’s
3.Creighton
4.Marquette
5.Providence
6.Georgetown
7.Xavier
8.Villanova
9.Butler
10.DePaul
11.Seton Hall


1.) UConn (#4)

Coming off of back-to-back championships, last year was a trip back down to earth for Hurley and his UConn Huskies. It of course wasn’t a complete failure as they still made the dance and won a game as an 8 seed, but it was a reset as they tried to reload after losing nearly everyone from those 2 championship runs. The last remaining stalwart is Alex Karaban, who is back for his final season, and the young talent that Hurley has brought in is sticking around in large part, with guys like Ball, Stewart and Ross all back attempting to grow into larger roles. At the end of the day, we know this will be a well coached team and the transfer backcourt additions should improve what was a relative weak point last year with Mahaney disappointing and the group being the worst shooting team here since 2021. Depth was also an issue for them last year and boy did Hurley fix that as he has brought in a ton of talent, all of which just simply can’t play this year, but to have them able to compete for time and push each other in practice is a fantastic sign. It might be hard to hold on to them all, but to have amassed this much talent has to lead you to believe Hurley is going to find a group of 8-9 guys that can contend with anyone in the country given the proven commodities he has at his disposal. I have no idea how the rotation will sort out, aside from Ball and Karaban, but it’s an embarrassment of riches for a HC that has built enough trust to believe this is going to be one of the best teams in the country, not just the Big East.

2.) St. John’s (#6)

I have immense respect for Rick Pitino and what he’s doing with St. John’s is just cementing his legacy as one of the all-time coaches in college basketball. Last year ended on a bit of a sour note though, losing in the 2nd round amidst a benching of star player RJ Luis. Outside of that, bringing St. John’s back to life and winning the Big East in year 2 is an awesome accomplishment and by the looks of it they’ll be right back in contention this year. Granted, there are a few question marks given all the talent that is leaving the program, but this transfer class is about as good as it gets across the country. You have two guys coming in with Hopkins and Mitchell who can play the 4 spot next to Ejiofor who is back to dominate the paint so the froncourt will be a strength. Their big weakness last year was scoring the ball and it’s inarguable that the guards Jackson, Sellers, Sanon and Darling are a better group of guards scoring the ball than they had last year. They may take a step back defensively from what they were last year but I fully expect a top-50 offense this year which should make up for a small step back on the other end. Expect The Garden to be rocking all year long once again and expect a better finish to the year from St. John’s who should absolutely be a national contender.

3.) Creighton (#18)

Greg McDermott continues to churn out successful season after successful season here at Creighton, and while it hasn’t produced much hardware they are still one of the perennial contenders in the conference and have made the dance 5 straight years, winning at least 1 game in each and reaching the 2nd weekend 3 of those trips. No Final 4’s or national titles, but you can’t talk about college basketball without at least considering what Creighton is doing in the Big East. Now, much of last year’s team is out, but there are several young pieces back looking to step into a larger role and the transfer class is very solid. I love the duo coming over from Iowa as both Dix and Freeman are fantastic fits in McDermott’s fast paced system. The returning bigs playing around Freeman will give them a very solid front court, the big question is going to be at the 2-3 spots. They have several options there, with mid major transfers Graves and Harper being good experienced options but the FR Greer and young transfer Swartz, a top-60 recruit to Miami last year, should both contend for minutes there as well. If a couple of those guys really hit and can contribute then I think Creighton can join UConn and St. John’s in the top tier of this conference, but for now I’ll keep them a step behind just due to the question marks in that backcourt. Nevertheless, I expect it to be 6 straight trips to the dance, with the outside chance that duo of Dix and Freeman have enough around them to be Final 4 threats.

4.) Marquette

There are very few programs across the country that are as tight of a ship as this Marquette program under Shaka Smart. This is now 2 years in a row that he hasn’t taken in a transfer, and with just one player exiting via the portal they win the roster continuity award by a mile. Of course, you have to be concerned about how heavily they leaned on dynamic playmakers like Tyler Kolek and Kam Jones who are now gone with no obvious guys filling those voids. That’s where the lack of using the transfer portal could come back to bite them, but one thing we know for sure is they are going to be a nightmare defensively. They were top-20 in the country each of the last 2 seasons at forcing TO’s, their big issue last year was allowing offensive rebounds. That’s an even bigger concern than the scoring deal because they added nothing to change that on the interior. That’s why I have them outside of my top-25 to start the year, and while I respect what Shaka is doing by bringing in FR, developing them and ultimately rewarding their loyalty by giving them the shot to grow into starting roles, it makes it difficult to fill holes when they arise. They desperately need Royce Parham to make a leap forward and a guy like Josh Clark who redshirted could be important as a 7-footer. At the end of the day I respect Shaka and trust in their defense enough to have them up here, but how they score and control the glass, two major components of the game, will determine just how good they can be. It’s not going to be his best team here, but I expect a 5th straight tourney appearance in year 5 for Shaka who has experienced much more success here than at Texas.

5.) Providence

I’m banking on last year being an aberration as I was uber impressed with Kim English in year 1 with the Friars. Last year just was a disaster ultimately with injury after injury to major contributors. We’ll hope they have much better injury luck and taking a look at the transfer talent that is coming in they should have a lot to work with, especially with Jason Edwards coming in and leading the show. I like Sellers and Floyd next to him and they have some strong frontcourt additions in Powell and Hargrove as well. Overall, I think if all this talent clicks and they get back to defending like they were in year 1 under English they have an outside shot at a tourney berth. They certainly aren’t going to be world beaters, but if they’re hitting their ceiling it won’t be fun traveling to Providence, Rhode Island in that environment. Look for guys like Mela and Erhunmwunse to be important development pieces as well, as they started shining late in expanded roles after all the injuries. This would be my dark horse to be a fun team that gets in as like a 10 seed. Not sure if that’s popular sentiment but there’s a surprising amount of talent here and English can coach. Watch out for the Friars is all I’m saying.

6.) Georgetown

Ed Cooley has had a bit of a tough time building back this Georgetown program, but last year was a major step in the right direction as they went from just 2 conference wins in year 1 all the way up to 8 a year ago. Now, they actually started out the year 12-2 before falling apart, but much of that was due to injuries to most of their top guys including NBA draft pick Thomas Sorber. The signs were good enough for me to believe Cooley has this train moving in the right direction, especially since he was able to hold on to some young talent that he brought in as his first true FR class. On top of that the transfers coming in I also like as a mix of veterans and promising young guys that should make immediate impacts. Mack/Lewis/Love make for a solid backcourt, with young pieces around them like DHS/Abraham/Williams looking for a bigger role than they previously had. The frontcourt could be the issue though, with just Iwuchukwu and the 3 returning guys from last year’s FR class (2 redshirts), I kind of question what that will look like. I do have them finishing better than last year, but I’m not sure if it will be good enough or not to get into the dance. They will need those transfer guards to really step up and also to continue their momentum defensively they showed last season (321st–>58th YOY). If they can get stops and this backcourt scores the way I think they can they should be fighting on the bubble all the way to the end. That’s the ceiling, but certainly with this many question marks it could be worse..

7.) Xavier

Well we have a 2nd Pitino entering the Big East as son Richard joins his dad in this conference that is fighting to remain in the power conference conversation without football. While I am excited about the potential here with Pitino and Xavier, I’m not convinced this rag tag group of mid-major transfers is going to get them humming in year 1. I mean, just look at the stark difference in roster makeup between UConn/St. John’s and this Xavier roster. I’m not trying to belittle the talent of these guys of course, but there are levels to this thing, and frankly I’m not buying stock in Xavier to be nationally relevant beyond the matchups between father and son that will inevitably capture people’s attention. I have no idea the resources that Xavier does or doesn’t have, but in this era that does matter and if they can’t pay to acquire the necessary talent Pitino might just use this as a launching pad to a job where he can. Now, that doesn’t preclude you from being competitive in the Big East and finding a way into the dance, but long term I wonder if he can build them to the point that UConn/St. John’s are so he can contend nationally. Also, let’s not totally conflate Richard’s history with his father’s, as Richard was the HC at Minnesota for 8 years and only made the dance twice. He got it going the last couple years at New Mexico but he has much to prove as a HC still. To say the least, I have reservations, both about this year’s roster and the future of this pairing of Xavier/Pitino. We’ll see how it plays out.

8.) Villanova

No program in the country has been more sad than the post-Jay Wright Villanova Wildcats over the past couple of years. Kyle Neptune was predictably unable to continue the success of Wright, taking a program that had made the tourney 9 straight years, including 2 national titles, through 3 straight seasons of missing the dance altogether. In comes Kevin Willard, who surprisingly left a Big Ten job to come back to the Big East to try and turn this ship around. He is going to have his work cut out for him in year 1 as he tries to completely rebuild this roster, with just 2 guys returning from a year ago. That means 8 transfers and 3 FR, with most of the proven production coming from the mid-major ranks. Devin Askew is probably the most proven commodity, a UK recruit way back in 2020, he should lead the show. Frankly though, beyond him it’s a bunch of question marks in terms of production that you can absolutely count on. That is why they are so low, and while it would be wild to think Villanova is going to remain outside of relevancy for a 4th year in a row, that is the state you can quickly find yourself in when you make the wrong hire. Neptune was that, and Willard is left to clean up the mess, we’ll see how much hay he can make in year 1.

9.) Butler

As an Indiana native seeing this Butler program struggling like this is a sad sight, but they really don’t have much to work with in this current era of college sports, so they’ll continue to hope that the wily vet Thad Matta can get some momentum going for this program that hasn’t been dancing since 2018. From the looks of it they were able to take one big swing in the transfer portal getting Jalen Jackson to run the show, and they’re going to need him to shoulder a big load offensively. They have some nice pieces to play around him with Butler and Ajayi coming in, and Bizjack returning as a catch and shoot option. In terms of playmaking though it’s going to all be on Jackson. This is probably Matta’s best FR class so that’s good news, but his track record of holding on to the FR he’s brought in is not great, as evidenced by the 5 guys transferring out this cycle. Much of that could be due to the money available at other schools, and that’s just the issue non-football schools are going to face. Short of a mega rich donor they’re left with only what the Big East can provide sans-football. Unfortunate, but Matta is going to have to coach his tail off to get this group back to the dance.

10.) DePaul

Alright we’re right where we want to be if you’re Chris Holtmann rebuilding DePaul. Sounds weird to say after just 4 Big East wins, but considering DePaul had won only 3 such games over the prior 2 seasons combined that is a major step forward. Now, after bringing in an entirely new roster last year you have 4 guys back, 3 of them being core rotation pieces. That’s progress, some momentum you might even say. You’ll of course have noticed I still have them way down at 10th in the league, but we’re starting from literal scratch here so this should not be offending anyone. I love that the backcourt is back with Gunn and Blocker, and Benson should slot right back in to contribute inside as well. What we’re looking at here are the additions of Banks and Maclin for scoring help as well as a wild card with Khaman Maker. He’s a 7’1″ C that was a pretty good recruit, if he can come in and anchor your defense as a rim protector and rebounder, all of a sudden we may be cooking with gas partner. I’m not trying to insinuate DePaul is going to be a contender, but who is to say we can’t double that win total and get up to 8 Big East wins? Do that and we slot up a couple of spots and have some real momentum. These are the programs I love to follow because you have a real pro who has coached at a high level trying to raise a dead program. That’s what this is all about, and while I doubt there’s a large contingency of DePaul hoops fans out there reading season previews…if you’re here just know, I’m rooting for you, and I see the light at the end of the tunnel.

11.) Seton Hall

It looked like Shaheen Holloway was going to be able to navigate the Big East waters well after year 2 where he had Seton Hall just on the outside of a tourney berth with positive momentum from year 1. That all came crashing down last year in what was nothing but a disaster of a season that culminated in just 2 Big East wins and finishing below DePaul. It’s one of those seasons you have to flush, and lucky for Holloway in this era you can just cycle everyone out and bring in an entire new team with relative ease. The unfortunate part is most of these guys are either productive mid-major talents or unheralded guys transferring down from power 4 conference teams where they didn’t play much and/or were wildly inefficient. That could be a good thing if they’re fighting to break through, but it could also be they didn’t earn that PT for a reason other than just simply a better guy was in front of them. None of those guys were these promising recruits that just need a role to shine in my opinion, so I genuinely think we’re looking at the worst team in the Big East here yet again with Seton Hall, in what could be Holloway’s final season here if that’s the case. Maybe he gets them to be an elite defensive team, as that’s his calling card, but that’s asking a lot for a team of complete strangers to come together and be connected on D. I don’t see it happening to say the least, so for Seton Hall I expect another tumultuous season that likely ends in a coaching search come spring.

CBB Contenders/Pretenders – FINAL

The tournament is finally here so we of course need to check to see where all of these teams sit as we enter the tourney. As I’ve been saying all year, we have 4 dominant teams and it played out as all 4 of them earned a 1 seed as Florida came on strong to end the season and claim the final 1 seed. Everyone loves to proclaim that it’s never as chalk as people think it’s going to be, but if there’s ever a year we see the 1 seeds dominate this would have to be the year. We have only had 4 teams since 2000 enter the tourney with a net Kenpom rating as high as all of our 4 1 seeds have this year. And wouldn’t you know they all made at least the Final 4 with 3 of them getting to the title game. Obviously, anything can happen as always, but you can already bet I will have at least 3 of these teams in my Final 4, with Houston the one I’m concerned about as of writing this due to the J’Wan Roberts injury. If he’s healthy full steam ahead for our all 1 seed Final 4, but if he’s out I would start to look beyond Houston at Tennessee and a sleeper pick being Clemson as the 5 seed in that region. Also, long time readers, how bout that finish to the season for Auburn? Not so crazy now am I…anywho, let’s get it.

For those new here, a quick refresher – The goal of this entire exercise is simple, try and place the “best” teams in college basketball into Archetypal buckets, and assess their likelihood of going on a deep run in March based on where they fall. This will all be derived from years of Kenpom data (2005-2024) which I have compiled to create 8 unique archetypes that, in my opinion, will help all who take notice avoid backing a horse that falls in the first weekend, and instead, lead you to hitch your wagon to one that finds itself making a deep tourney run. What we’re not attempting to do is pick the team that comes out of nowhere and goes on a deep run, a la NC State last year.

So, we will focus on the top-30 in Kenpom as of each update. For context, entering the tournament just 8 of the 76 (10.5%) total Final 4 teams since 2005 have entered the tourney outside the top-30. Just with that we already can narrow down our focus and begin to analyze what characteristics of those teams we can identify as key indicators. On top of that we can track week over week movements and spot teams who are improving vs fading.

The 8 Archetypes are:

  • Elite
  • Great
  • Solid
  • Strong Enough

Below I will provide some context for each archetype and list the teams that fall in at the time of publishing. There will be a graphic for each category that shows the criteria and the percentage of teams who fell into that category since 2005 that made it to each round. For example, 83.9% of Elite teams have made it out of the first weekend into the Sweet 16. Juxtapose that with just 19.6% of Vanilla teams and you should catch on real quick to what we’re doing here.

This week’s update:

ELITE:

Here is where we find the cream of the crop in college basketball, as these are the teams who are top-10 in both offensive and defensive efficiency. These are exceptionally good teams, with only 1 such team over the last 2 seasons. However, we’ve already had Iowa St, Auburn and Duke land here, with both the Cyclones and Blue Devils still here this week, so it’s not looking like a year without an elite team. 84% of these teams survive the first weekend, with a whopping 42% getting to the Final 4, almost 20 points better than the next closest Archetype.

Our same trio of elite teams that we’ve been tracking all year long. I would at minimum have these teams in the Elite 8, but watch out for Houston as they have a Strong Enough team Gonzaga potentially in round 2 with J’Wan Roberts last seen in a boot. Also, Clemson as Solid is the 5 that they could see in the Sweet 16 so the path won’t be easy.

GREAT:

The next couple are going to be pretty obvious but we’re notching down a peg to teams who weren’t top-10 but do happen to be top-15 on both ends of the floor. It’s pretty consistent in terms of odds of getting out of the first weekend, but does drop off decently as you go to Elite 8 and beyond. Still, with only 31 teams to have entered the tourney as “Elite” since 2005 we may find the 2nd or 3rd options this year fall here. These aren’t always your top seeds either, with 2023 UConn being a perfect example as a 4 seed falling here and winning the whole thing.

Still have Auburn just a step off the pace but as you can see in the numbers teams here are still very successful in March, especially the first weekend. I will have Auburn in my Final 4, but losing to Florida in a SEC clash.

SOLID:

Following the trend here, down a peg to teams who were top-25 on both ends but outside of top-15. I will note the difference between top-20 and top-25 was negligible, with the top-20 teams much more resembling the top-25 numbers vs the top-15, so they’ve been combined.

Tennessee is the team I’m really watching here as they’re borderline Great and looked awesome in the SEC tourney. They are Houston light, with a bit more difficulty scoring, but we could have an opening for them if Houston goes down early, so I’m thinking Tennessee to the Final 4. Iowa St is dealing with injuries so tread lightly there and I already mentioned I’m watching Clemson as a dark horse Elite 8 team.

STRONG ENOUGH:

This is where we start getting a little unique and into the weeds, as we’ve had to find a bucket for those that fail to land in the top-25 on both ends but are elite on one end of the floor. Conversely they aren’t horrible on the other end, so they don’t drop down to our vulnerable categories. They’re just good enough on their weaker end of the floor that their elite abilities are able to carry them with some confidence out of the first weekend. I had to find the line of demarcation, where the weakness became tangible in the results. The teams ranking above 50 over and over again stood out with early exits, so that’s where it stuck after the numbers confirmed that the teams that live in this area perform much better than those in the “Matadors” or “Grinders” categories just by limiting that weakness. Obviously, the weakness is still indicating less reliability, with nearly half as many “Strong Enough” teams reaching the Elite 8 as “Elite” teams (35% vs 67%.).

Alabama has a good draw with 0 other teams in trustworthy categories until the Elite 8 potential matchup with Duke. If they get knocked off before that I’m looking at Wisconsin who is just outside the Solid group. Texas Tech and Michigan St look like strong Elite 8 picks as well, as Tech has Grinder St. John’s and Sparty gets a beat up Iowa St potentially as the biggest test. Maryland has to get through Florida so I’m stopping them at the Sweet 16 but confident in them and same with A&M.

MATADORS

Now we get into the teams we have to start worrying about which are the overly unbalanced teams. This group will be the teams that can put on a show offensively but who really struggle defensively. We’ve seen time and time again this type of team lose in the first round, including top seeded teams like Kentucky (’24), Iowa (’22), and Ohio St (’21) just to name a few recent examples. The data tells us if you’re gonna be bad on one end it’s better to be worse on D than O, but it still is a stark drop off from 62% (Solid) to the Sweet 16, to just shy of 37% here.

Not picking these teams to get past the first weekend, end of story. Don’t play D you don’t win in March.

GRINDERS:

Similar to the Matador group this group of teams is very unbalanced, just on the other end of the floor. We all know teams like this, that are forced to take you to the deep waters and test your resolve. Physicality, toughness and relentless pressure on D, but they just can’t seem to score the basketball on a consistent basis. These teams historically have really struggled in March, with nearly 3/4 of them flaming out the first weekend. Some recent examples include Iowa St (’23), LSU (’22), Kansas and Tennessee (’21) among many others.

St. John’s might be an outlier here because they’re so good on defense but I’m not taking them beyond the Sweet 16 for sure. St. Mary’s night night.

WANNABE’S

I classified these teams as wannabe’s because they are unbalanced, excelling on one end of the floor compared to the other but not at an elite level. They’re solid on one end and competent on the other, keeping them out of the Vanilla category thanks to their better than average ability on one end but still it is not enough to make up for their deficiency on the other.

Not much faith in any of these teams except maybe Arizona/Wisconsin who have some favorable matchups. No Final 4 for sure, probably not past Sweet 16 at best.

VANILLA:

These are your purely average teams, who don’t truly excel on either end of the floor. They find ways to win and remain amongst the top-30 teams but without that true strength to lean on and without the overall elite ability they’re just kind of meh, and you see it in the numbers. With greater than 80% failing to make it out of the first weekend and nearly half checking out after just 1 game these are the last teams you want to trust come March. Some recent examples include Texas Tech (’24), Virginia/Duke/Indiana (’23) and Illinois/UConn (’22) who all failed to get out of the first weekend.

No chance beyond the first weekend for these teams either. Can’t do it won’t do it.